Curt Doolittle

Theme: Institution

  • YOU ARE NOT IN CONTROL OF TERMS OF THE SOCIAL ORDER Libertarianism SUGGESTS to y

    YOU ARE NOT IN CONTROL OF TERMS OF THE SOCIAL ORDER

    Libertarianism SUGGESTS to you (falsely, by abrahamic false promise) that you are in control of the terms by which people will tolerate your existence (proximity, participation, survival) – you are not in control of it. They control it. Because the network of promises (habits norms etc) that they cooperate by are what they depend upon for survival, risk mitigation, consumption, comfort, and joy. You are only in control of which polity you choose to participate in on their terms.

    Now, this is a male attempt to adopt a female means of persuasion. But a female is intrinsically valuable and a man is not. So your participation isn’t desirable. In fact, the maximum female, minimum male participation is desirable.

    So no libertarianism is (a) an attempt to claim you have intrinsic value by threat of withdrawal from cooperation (b) except that if you don’t want to cooperate on the groups terms then we don’t want you, and frankly you’re not only dead weight but better off gone or d–d. Ans so if you don’t want to cooperate on those terms the question is why do we let you live?

    Worse, since aryan reciprocity and christian forgiveness are the optimum social economic political and strategic orders – and the only reason you can disagree with them is to parasitically live off the aryan-christian commons, then you are stuck with not only explaining why you should be tolerated, but why anyone living anywhere on earth should tolerate you.

    You don’t have to do anything except NOT impose costs upon others.

    (Again, (((They’re all cognitively Female))) so it makes perfect sense that they would develop libertarianism as if they were intrinsically valuable when they’re intrinsically parasitic.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 13:38:00 UTC

  • HOW THE PROPERTARIAN ORGANIZATION FUNCTIONS Listen. John opens the sales funnel

    HOW THE PROPERTARIAN ORGANIZATION FUNCTIONS

    Listen. John opens the sales funnel – with promise of revolution and renaissance. I produce content that creates the legitimacy of the solution. The team picks up on the people with potential. The SN group then educates them in how to convert political natural law to applied personal philosophy. The Institute takes the best and teaches them the law. This is our “organization”. We will need to move to promotion this year and we will be able to do that because enough parties are involved now, and we have enough momentum. We need to roughly double the number of top people this year. And do it again the next. Then we will start owning the discourse. (And when I start making the videos on lying it’s going to go viral.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 12:06:00 UTC

  • HOW THE PROPERTARIAN ORGANIZATION FUNCTIONS Listen. John opens the sales funnel

    HOW THE PROPERTARIAN ORGANIZATION FUNCTIONS

    Listen. John opens the sales funnel – with promise of revolution and renaissance. I produce content that creates the legitimacy of the solution. The team picks up on the people with potential. The SN group then educates them in how to convert political natural law to applied personal philosophy. The Institute takes the best and teaches them the law. This is our “organization”. We will need to move to promotion this year and we will be able to do that because enough parties are involved now, and we have enough momentum. We need to roughly double the number of top people this year. And do it again the next. Then we will start owning the discourse. (And when I start making the videos on lying it’s going to go viral.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 11:58:00 UTC

  • Judges have the finest record of any body of people in america other than perhap

    Judges have the finest record of any body of people in america other than perhaps – until the immigrant hordes – medicine (doctors). The problem is that the constitution was too weak in defining the theory of jurisprudence (something I’ve repaired). And so the left abused it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 00:33:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218692929704931333

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford @probiotical

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218643816795852800

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218643816795852800

  • THE PROBLEM OF THE ABSOLUTE NUCLEAR FAMILY (ANF) …(James Brittingham Says:) Un

    THE PROBLEM OF THE ABSOLUTE NUCLEAR FAMILY (ANF)

    …(James Brittingham Says:)
    Under the nuclear family individuals are asked to forgo the comfort, protection of large familiar networks, and… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=557469838183244&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-18 15:20:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218553654443225089

  • THE PROBLEM OF THE ABSOLUTE NUCLEAR FAMILY (ANF) …(James Brittingham Says:) Un

    THE PROBLEM OF THE ABSOLUTE NUCLEAR FAMILY (ANF)

    …(James Brittingham Says:)

    Under the nuclear family individuals are asked to forgo the comfort, protection of large familiar networks, and women face the crucible of spending all day at home alone with infants, in order to pay our surplus production into a national, civilizational or global commons.

    Sorry but this is oppression.

    Mestizoes, Hassids, bourgeois Muslims, and the Amish all live much better than “legacy Americans”, and our interlopers can hardly be blamed for noticing this.

    …(Curt Doolittle Says:)

    Nuclear families in northern europe just meant that you needed to afford a home before having children.

    So houses were nearby and communities swapped children to help each other all the time. So the entire community was an extended family.

    But your criticism is correct. Extended families, particularly

    three generation families are optimum .

    To do that we must move capital to people not people to capital.

    …(Bill Joslin Says:)

    The break in the continuity of absolute nuclear families to their extended families results from urban planners and bankers in the 1920’s which closed the door on multifamily mortgages.

    The “anglo failure” of absolute nuclear families isn’t intrinsic to the the ANF familial strategy but rather due to an extension of the strategy that inadvertently created it in the first place: i.e. usurping intergenerational transfer of wealth for those below the upper middle class.

    The Anglo reaction to the influx in Irish and Italian migrants, both of which were accustomed to multigenerational homes, urban planners and banks removed the possibility of a multigenerational home.

    Urban planners via design and zoning permits (i.e. zoning rental buildings as “single family dwellings” and banks refusing mortgages issued that had more than a single nuclear family on the application. This prevented these migrants from pooling resources and labour to make a stake and establish themselves quickly to American life. It insured the municipalities and landlords capitalized on the new population growth. every generation would pay their rent and live separately as a result.

    Similarly, the church outlawing cousin marriages, a few centuries before, pertained to land and estate grabs by the church. inheritance that would be handed to the next generation now went to the church.

    In both cases the multigenerational home was dismantled in an effort to break them apart as single economic units in order to extract more wealth from them.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-18 10:19:00 UTC

  • I’m sure you do or at least think so. Although it’s pretty hard to argue with tr

    I’m sure you do or at least think so. Although it’s pretty hard to argue with trumps policies. Including using the media against itself. Ian’s including assuming the bureaucracies will resist his withdrawal of the empire into domestic self interest.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-17 17:51:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218229388468158466

    Reply addressees: @KralcTrebor @ARossP @tedcruz @RandPaul @MittRomney @SenatorCollins @lisamurkowski @SenMcSallyAZ @SenMikeLee @johnthune @SenatorWicker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218220304889208834

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218220304889208834

  • RESTORING MARITAL INCENTIVES The reason men don’t want to get married is common

    RESTORING MARITAL INCENTIVES
    The reason men don’t want to get married is common property, alimony, child support – all of which are ‘rent-seeking’ (forms of corruption) – and lack of standing to suit for interference in the marriage: But All’s fixable.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-17 13:38:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218165659730923521

  • Control or Liquidity. Choose. You don’t get both. That’s why shares are sold by

    Control or Liquidity. Choose. You don’t get both. That’s why shares are sold by false promise.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-17 11:38:00 UTC

  • 23) We did develop those traditions (Market Hierarchy), Hindustanis did(Caste hi

    23) We did develop those traditions (Market Hierarchy), Hindustanis did(Caste hierarchy) less so, and the Chinese(Monopoly hierarchy) did. The persians were ruined by three waves of muslim raiders. The arabs, jews, gypsies never did. And the pacific and africans were behind.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-16 15:01:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217824104948150273

    Reply addressees: @HliosX @MurraySuggests

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217823192586301442

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HliosX @MurraySuggests 22) Peoples who never developed agrarian norms, traditions, institutions and genetics,and remained migratory thieves(gypsies) or shepherds(arabs) on one end, or traders(jews) on the other,never developed the bias for commons and the returns on commons, and hence despotic empires.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217823192586301442

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @HliosX @MurraySuggests 22) Peoples who never developed agrarian norms, traditions, institutions and genetics,and remained migratory thieves(gypsies) or shepherds(arabs) on one end, or traders(jews) on the other,never developed the bias for commons and the returns on commons, and hence despotic empires.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217823192586301442