Jan 17, 2020, 2:23 PM
—“Curt: I’m reading the book Sex at Dawn of your library. So which is our natural form of mating: monogamy or polygamy? What type of mating we ( europeans) should aspire?”—
AFAIK, pairing off via serial monogamy with discreet cheating that doesn’t insult the other party is the sort of median – but we adapt to monogamy-polygamy or serial marriage, or serial marriage with ‘cheating’ pretty easily. Religion imposed monogamy because men kill over women.
Jan 17, 2020, 2:23 PM
—“Curt: I’m reading the book Sex at Dawn of your library. So which is our natural form of mating: monogamy or polygamy? What type of mating we ( europeans) should aspire?”—
AFAIK, pairing off via serial monogamy with discreet cheating that doesn’t insult the other party is the sort of median – but we adapt to monogamy-polygamy or serial marriage, or serial marriage with ‘cheating’ pretty easily. Religion imposed monogamy because men kill over women.
A limited number of social orders are possible:
i) Genetically imperial (Han Chinese, Russian Empire),
ii) Large hierarchy of casts (india),
iii) Small homogenous and dynamic (europe, japan).
iv) Tyrannical hetero-tribal,
v) Failed peoples that cannot hold territory (diasporic unlanded people). Every experience with heterogeneity has failed. (Middle East, Brazil, and most obviously, India.) The most successful states are homogenous kin groups (China, Korea, Japan, the nordics, and until recently western europe.) The Chinese/Japanese/Korean civilization will very soon dominate the world economic and political sphere, and their racial exclusion will be copied by the rest of the world. The problem isn’t racism. The problem is that most unsuccessful races, subraces, tribes, and clans, consist of excessively large underclasses whose standards of living cannot be satisfied now that the advantages of western technology have been redistributed. Look at brazil. Look at the USA. The ‘whites’ are trying to separate. The jews remain separated. The diasporic chinese separate. It’s underclass peoples that commingle. The optimum social order is homogenous, for the simple reason that we redistribute to kin and resist redistribution to competitors. The optimum possible social and political order is kinship. (Do the research) Kin selection is an evolutionary advantage. (Do the research) The experiment with Democracy has largely failed. (Do the research)
A limited number of social orders are possible:
i) Genetically imperial (Han Chinese, Russian Empire),
ii) Large hierarchy of casts (india),
iii) Small homogenous and dynamic (europe, japan).
iv) Tyrannical hetero-tribal,
v) Failed peoples that cannot hold territory (diasporic unlanded people). Every experience with heterogeneity has failed. (Middle East, Brazil, and most obviously, India.) The most successful states are homogenous kin groups (China, Korea, Japan, the nordics, and until recently western europe.) The Chinese/Japanese/Korean civilization will very soon dominate the world economic and political sphere, and their racial exclusion will be copied by the rest of the world. The problem isn’t racism. The problem is that most unsuccessful races, subraces, tribes, and clans, consist of excessively large underclasses whose standards of living cannot be satisfied now that the advantages of western technology have been redistributed. Look at brazil. Look at the USA. The ‘whites’ are trying to separate. The jews remain separated. The diasporic chinese separate. It’s underclass peoples that commingle. The optimum social order is homogenous, for the simple reason that we redistribute to kin and resist redistribution to competitors. The optimum possible social and political order is kinship. (Do the research) Kin selection is an evolutionary advantage. (Do the research) The experiment with Democracy has largely failed. (Do the research)
Jan 22, 2020, 11:51 AM 1. Lack of Vital Components: This is the correct criticism. My plan has been consistent: A moral license, a set of demands, a plan of transition and a means of insurrection. So far you can only see through the set of demands (constitution). It does not pay to release more information. The window has to move further.
3. I’ll give you a warning: your conservatism (“show me, i need to understand”) is effective in resisting change only if you are in control. And it’s been a failure in resisting when you are not in control. And we lost control when women and underclasses entered the franchise. And you (we) let them into the franchise out of christian optimism during a period of windfall profits at civilizational scale – one that will never repeat again given the seizure of low hanging scientific fruits. So, I”m going to be blunt and say ‘if you need to understand to act, then you are the reason you fail.” The left just seizes a series of opportunities for incremental advancement. Your need for ‘understanding’ and ‘certainty’ is why you (conservatives) have failed. And the hand-wringing (cowards) on the right are the majority. I have studied many things not the least of which is the history of revolutions and evolutions in governance both inside the anglo european and outside it. The last time we had a political solution available to us was 1992. We have not had that solution available to us yet. it is only under extreme duress, and the inability to deny being ‘conservative and politically lazy’ that the overton window moves to the blatantly obvious. So the problem is the man in your mirror that even asks these questions rather than running to every rally, every demonstration,m every opportunity, and yes, every fight, to defend what you depend upon but really want others to solve for you so you can continue being lazy ‘conservatives’. There is no condition under which we can gain control after this next election and that is simply it. The only solution is to eliminate the optimism of the ‘white middle’ civic nationalists by evidence that they cannot contradict: the exposure of differences in groups under duress.
Jan 22, 2020, 11:51 AM 1. Lack of Vital Components: This is the correct criticism. My plan has been consistent: A moral license, a set of demands, a plan of transition and a means of insurrection. So far you can only see through the set of demands (constitution). It does not pay to release more information. The window has to move further.
3. I’ll give you a warning: your conservatism (“show me, i need to understand”) is effective in resisting change only if you are in control. And it’s been a failure in resisting when you are not in control. And we lost control when women and underclasses entered the franchise. And you (we) let them into the franchise out of christian optimism during a period of windfall profits at civilizational scale – one that will never repeat again given the seizure of low hanging scientific fruits. So, I”m going to be blunt and say ‘if you need to understand to act, then you are the reason you fail.” The left just seizes a series of opportunities for incremental advancement. Your need for ‘understanding’ and ‘certainty’ is why you (conservatives) have failed. And the hand-wringing (cowards) on the right are the majority. I have studied many things not the least of which is the history of revolutions and evolutions in governance both inside the anglo european and outside it. The last time we had a political solution available to us was 1992. We have not had that solution available to us yet. it is only under extreme duress, and the inability to deny being ‘conservative and politically lazy’ that the overton window moves to the blatantly obvious. So the problem is the man in your mirror that even asks these questions rather than running to every rally, every demonstration,m every opportunity, and yes, every fight, to defend what you depend upon but really want others to solve for you so you can continue being lazy ‘conservatives’. There is no condition under which we can gain control after this next election and that is simply it. The only solution is to eliminate the optimism of the ‘white middle’ civic nationalists by evidence that they cannot contradict: the exposure of differences in groups under duress.
How the Propertarian Organization Functions https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/how-the-propertarian-organization-functions/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 19:41:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265005182322163712
Jan 22, 2020, 11:58 AM Listen. John opens the sales funnel – with promise of revolution and renaissance. I produce content that creates the legitimacy of the solution. The team picks up on the people with potential. The SN group then educates them in how to convert political natural law to applied personal philosophy. The Institute takes the best and teaches them the law. This is our “organization”. We will need to move to promotion this year and we will be able to do that because enough parties are involved now, and we have enough momentum. We need to roughly double the number of top people this year. And do it again the next. Then we will start owning the discourse. (And when I start making the videos on lying it’s going to go viral.)
Jan 22, 2020, 11:58 AM Listen. John opens the sales funnel – with promise of revolution and renaissance. I produce content that creates the legitimacy of the solution. The team picks up on the people with potential. The SN group then educates them in how to convert political natural law to applied personal philosophy. The Institute takes the best and teaches them the law. This is our “organization”. We will need to move to promotion this year and we will be able to do that because enough parties are involved now, and we have enough momentum. We need to roughly double the number of top people this year. And do it again the next. Then we will start owning the discourse. (And when I start making the videos on lying it’s going to go viral.)
Jan 23, 2020, 8:36 AM Gods are just characters we use for kings, or pack leaders that circumvent the need for pack-leaders across families, clans, tribes, and nations, that allow us to express loyalty independent of family clan, tribe and nation. Religions are just a means of embodying rules of temporal and intergenerational behavior between families, clans, tribes, nations in ignorant, pre-literate, verbally transmitted form. False promise is a means of addicting us to following those rules despite our increase in powerlessness as the scale of our social and political orders increases – thereby alienating us. Judaism was and remains a means of constructing a mobile networked, organized crime family under the pretense of a religion. Islam is a means of constructing a universal army that conducts warfare against civilization by undermining from within and continuous raiding and attrition. Christianity was just a means of constructing a universal rebellion against civilization – but one that never managed to be able to govern because the military aristocracy and the enfranchisement of men in the military, and continuous warfare prevented it. Although were it not for the restoration of paganism via the vikings it’s not clear that we would have been able to resist islam or conduct the crusades. Christianity is just another untestifiable, unwarrantable, abrahamic false promise, to keep you ignorant and submissive and open to conquest by jews at the top and muslims at the bottom, and now, marxism, postmodernism, feminism use the same technique of false promise in the REAL world (future) instead of in the UNREAL world (after death).