Theme: Institution

  • Thing(Thang, Ding): Jury > Assembly > Senate > Legislature

    Nov 6, 2019, 6:57 AM Thing (assembly) – Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

    THING(THANG,DING): JURY > ASSEMBLY > SENATE > LEGISLATURE

    A thing was a governing assembly in early Germanic society, made up of the free people of the community presided over by law-speakers. The word appears in Old Norse, Old English, and modern Icelandic as þing, in Middle English (as in modern English), Old Saxon, Old Dutch, and Old Frisian as thing, in German as Ding, and in modern Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Faroese, Gutnish, and Norn as ting, all from a reconstructed Proto-Germanic neuter *þingą; the word is the same as the more common English word thing, both having at their heart the basic meaning of “an assemblage, a coming together of parts”—in the one case, an “assembly” or “meeting”, in the other, an “entity”, “object”, or “thing”. The meeting-place of a thing was called a “thingstead” (Old English þingstede) or “thingstow” (Old English þingstōw). The Anglo-Saxon folkmoot (Old English folcgemōt, “folk meeting”; Middle English folkesmōt; modern Norwegian folkemøte) was analogous, the forerunner to the witenagemōt and a precursor of the modern Parliament of the United Kingdom. Today the term lives on in the English term hustings, in the official names of national legislatures and political and judicial institutions of Nordic countries and, in the Manx form tyn, as a term for the three legislative bodies on the Isle of Man.

  • Thing(Thang, Ding): Jury > Assembly > Senate > Legislature

    Nov 6, 2019, 6:57 AM Thing (assembly) – Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

    THING(THANG,DING): JURY > ASSEMBLY > SENATE > LEGISLATURE

    A thing was a governing assembly in early Germanic society, made up of the free people of the community presided over by law-speakers. The word appears in Old Norse, Old English, and modern Icelandic as þing, in Middle English (as in modern English), Old Saxon, Old Dutch, and Old Frisian as thing, in German as Ding, and in modern Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Faroese, Gutnish, and Norn as ting, all from a reconstructed Proto-Germanic neuter *þingą; the word is the same as the more common English word thing, both having at their heart the basic meaning of “an assemblage, a coming together of parts”—in the one case, an “assembly” or “meeting”, in the other, an “entity”, “object”, or “thing”. The meeting-place of a thing was called a “thingstead” (Old English þingstede) or “thingstow” (Old English þingstōw). The Anglo-Saxon folkmoot (Old English folcgemōt, “folk meeting”; Middle English folkesmōt; modern Norwegian folkemøte) was analogous, the forerunner to the witenagemōt and a precursor of the modern Parliament of the United Kingdom. Today the term lives on in the English term hustings, in the official names of national legislatures and political and judicial institutions of Nordic countries and, in the Manx form tyn, as a term for the three legislative bodies on the Isle of Man.

  • Sorry but I Am Not Wrong on Monarchy.

    Sorry but I am not wrong on Monarchy. I don’t make errors. Read Hoppe Monarchy is the last line of defense against the failure of institutions to protect the people from usurpation by incremental or direct means. Monarchy has the optimum incentive for the production of arts and aesthetic commons that persist traditions. Monarchy has the optimum incentives to persist the nation, the people, people their genes as a family. Monarchy prevents the displacement of human heads of the national family with supernatural, or ideological heads of the national family. Washington’s only mistake was not taking the position of king and thereby preventing the civil war and the undermining of our people in the postwar period by eastern european jewish intellectuals intent on creating the same ‘license’ that they had in the Pale. If elizabeth was not fearful OF speaking out she would. She is merely waiting out the ‘democratic experiment’ which is rapidly coming to an end. We restore europe by restoring monarchies, and thereby restoring nation states, with ‘free cities’ for those who are less conforming, but want the benefits of our superior social political legal economic, and intellectual order. Cheers

  • Sorry but I Am Not Wrong on Monarchy.

    Sorry but I am not wrong on Monarchy. I don’t make errors. Read Hoppe Monarchy is the last line of defense against the failure of institutions to protect the people from usurpation by incremental or direct means. Monarchy has the optimum incentive for the production of arts and aesthetic commons that persist traditions. Monarchy has the optimum incentives to persist the nation, the people, people their genes as a family. Monarchy prevents the displacement of human heads of the national family with supernatural, or ideological heads of the national family. Washington’s only mistake was not taking the position of king and thereby preventing the civil war and the undermining of our people in the postwar period by eastern european jewish intellectuals intent on creating the same ‘license’ that they had in the Pale. If elizabeth was not fearful OF speaking out she would. She is merely waiting out the ‘democratic experiment’ which is rapidly coming to an end. We restore europe by restoring monarchies, and thereby restoring nation states, with ‘free cities’ for those who are less conforming, but want the benefits of our superior social political legal economic, and intellectual order. Cheers

  • Elective Monarchy vs Heriditary Monarchy

    Nov 18, 2019, 10:13 AM by Daniel Gurpide A hereditary monarchy lends a certain sense of stability to a democratic people, the sense of a family. That is not so under the rule of an elective monarchy such as the American one. Besides, at moments of grave national crises a hereditary monarch, whatever his other weaknesses or shortcomings, may save an entire country from destruction (Italy, Japan). (CD: There is no force to prevent usurpation like kinship)

  • Elective Monarchy vs Heriditary Monarchy

    Nov 18, 2019, 10:13 AM by Daniel Gurpide A hereditary monarchy lends a certain sense of stability to a democratic people, the sense of a family. That is not so under the rule of an elective monarchy such as the American one. Besides, at moments of grave national crises a hereditary monarch, whatever his other weaknesses or shortcomings, may save an entire country from destruction (Italy, Japan). (CD: There is no force to prevent usurpation like kinship)

  • Catholic Schools, Military Schools, Uniforms

    A very very big fan of catholic schools in childhood, and military schools after twelve. I think mostly because it made me feel that someone else was as concerned about the semi-domesticated animals as I was. St Marys Church and School (Nuns are demon hellspawn) Canandaigua Academy (back when Germans taught classes) St Francis Xavier High School (Monks are awesome teachers)

  • Nov 26, 2019, 1:51 PM —“The state exists as an institution for the production

    Nov 26, 2019, 1:51 PM

    —“The state exists as an institution for the production and protection of commons owned by its citizens. Benefiting from the commons does not make one a citizen. Refraining from the destruction of them does.”– Micah Pezdirtz

  • Nov 26, 2019, 1:51 PM —“The state exists as an institution for the production

    Nov 26, 2019, 1:51 PM

    —“The state exists as an institution for the production and protection of commons owned by its citizens. Benefiting from the commons does not make one a citizen. Refraining from the destruction of them does.”– Micah Pezdirtz

  • The Institutionalization of Lying

    The Institutionalization of Lying https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/the-institutionalization-of-lying/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 20:52:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266834987342495746