THE NATURAL LAW ON MEDIA CONTENT REGARDING: “News Outlets Are Liable for Others’ Facebook Comments, Australian Court Rules: Australian court says newspapers, TV stations that post their own articles should be considered publishers of defamatory comments” 1 – All copyright law is reduced to creative commons, and narrow interpretation. (Profound) 2 – All public speech: speech in public, to the public, in matters public must be testimonial form: Truthful, Reciprocal, Free of false promise, baiting into hazard, and proposing a competing solution that is truthful and reciprocal. 3 – Defamation by both libel (publication), and slander (speech) is restored. 4 – News (Twitter), Communication (Facebook), and Indexing (Google), as well as consumer banking, and consumer credit (visa/mc) are strategic infrastructure, and nationalized (the state takes a majority interest at the expense of investors as punishment for crimes against the people). 5 – Only content by Identity-Verified Individuals (credit card, phone number, drivers’ license, passport) may be shared outside of voluntary personal networks (friends, followers) by the publisher (platform). Identity of each individual determines jurisdiction of the individual. 6 – All individuals will be profiled for personality, moral, political, and religious biases (this is already extant). Individuals can opt into our out of jurisdictional, linguistic, moral, political, and religious biases (expose filters to users). 7 – Services will be provided for jurisdictions to (a) filter jurisdictions, (b) filter topics, (c) filter users, and (d) filter content. And jurisdictions may filter as they choose. 8 – Otherwise services may NOT filter content except pornography, gore, suicide, and crime. 10 – Services may NOT filter political content or any other content. Individuals that violate content selections will be limited to friends and followers networks. Or friends networks. Or destination (unshared). But they cannot be prohibited from direct voluntary communication within their voluntary network. 11 – All information about individuals, or produced by individuals is forever their property. 12 – All individuals have the right to be forgotten in entirety, but not selectively. AS SUCH All governments have the right and ability to self regulate platform content in their jurisdictions at their own cost, but may not externalize that cost nor involve the hosting service provider ( Platform ) in their internal matters. The united states will consider any attempt to externalize costs onto the service providers as a trade violation, and respond accordingly. AS SUCH The international network governance will be repatriated to the USG, and managed by a volunteer organization sworn to the USG law independent of all other law.
Theme: Institution
-
DEFINITION: What’s the Difference Between a Community and A Polity?
WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A COMMUNITY AND A POLITY? Kin: People of common genetic interest. Community: Market between Kin of Common Interests. Polity: Market Between Communities of Common Interests Society: Norms shared by kin, and communities within a polity. People nearly always lie when they use community or society in order to conduct the fraud of claiming common interest where there is competitive interest. There is no involuntary ‘we’.
-
DEFINITION: What’s the Difference Between a Community and A Polity?
WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A COMMUNITY AND A POLITY? Kin: People of common genetic interest. Community: Market between Kin of Common Interests. Polity: Market Between Communities of Common Interests Society: Norms shared by kin, and communities within a polity. People nearly always lie when they use community or society in order to conduct the fraud of claiming common interest where there is competitive interest. There is no involuntary ‘we’.
-
The Reason for Laws Against Child Abuse
THE REASON FOR LAWS AGAINST CHILD ABUSE
—“Raising a family is an act of patriotism and sacrifice. After all… Children are commons. They affect the entire polity. And they are the most feasible, concrete way for we mortals to transcend. So let’s give them a reason to be proud of us once we get to infinity.”—José Francisco Mayora —“Which is the reason why we we have any laws against child abuse. It’s not just family insuring the children and the polity from the children, but polity also insures children, even from their own families.”—Martin Štěpán
-
The Reason for Laws Against Child Abuse
THE REASON FOR LAWS AGAINST CHILD ABUSE
—“Raising a family is an act of patriotism and sacrifice. After all… Children are commons. They affect the entire polity. And they are the most feasible, concrete way for we mortals to transcend. So let’s give them a reason to be proud of us once we get to infinity.”—José Francisco Mayora —“Which is the reason why we we have any laws against child abuse. It’s not just family insuring the children and the polity from the children, but polity also insures children, even from their own families.”—Martin Štěpán
-
Responsibility vs Insurer, Warranty, and Liability
Subtle point Martin just hinted at, is that under P-law you don’t have to ‘take’ responsibility. You either insure or you don’t, and you insure because there is no alternative, or you insure because it is a choice. But “responsibility” under P, such that it’s a choice, is very limited. In almost all cases you are insure, warranty, and are liable whether you choose to be or not. And this is what will offend the free riding left most of all.
-
The Origin of Institutional Law
The Origin of Institutional Law https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/the-origin-of-institutional-law/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 16:36:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267495226404483073
-
The Origin of Institutional Law
The Origin of Institutional Law https://t.co/UvEJY7mSQb
-
The Origin of Institutional Law
THE ORIGIN OF INSTITUTIONAL LAW
—“Dear mr Doolittle, How to avoid bloodfeuds and endless vengeance in a society based on rule of natural law(reciprocity)?”—Sietze Bosman @fryskefilosoof
I don’t understand… wait… ok. Here… Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, insured by, and settled by, the court and sheriffs, by forcible restitution, punishment, prevention, and prohibition on further retaliation by parties. It’s uncommon knowledge that the origin of all customary and political law is the resolution of disputes between families or clans, because of the excessive cost and consequence of retaliation cycles (feuds). As such, the polity insures peaceful settlement w/ law, court, jury.
-
The Origin of Institutional Law
THE ORIGIN OF INSTITUTIONAL LAW
—“Dear mr Doolittle, How to avoid bloodfeuds and endless vengeance in a society based on rule of natural law(reciprocity)?”—Sietze Bosman @fryskefilosoof
I don’t understand… wait… ok. Here… Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, insured by, and settled by, the court and sheriffs, by forcible restitution, punishment, prevention, and prohibition on further retaliation by parties. It’s uncommon knowledge that the origin of all customary and political law is the resolution of disputes between families or clans, because of the excessive cost and consequence of retaliation cycles (feuds). As such, the polity insures peaceful settlement w/ law, court, jury.