Theme: Institution

  • Church vs State Accountability in Education

    The difference between the Church’s education and state education is that the Church’s future was dependent upon the production of capable peasants – and so the priests, brothers, and sisters were economically ACCOUNTABLE for at least the social and economic results of their efforts. As the product of what remained of catholic education myself, the near military discipline, was almost as good as the military discipline of the military schools (Which I begged for and couldn’t get).

    The problem with contemporary education isn’t just that the schools aren’t run by the nobility, they aren’t staffed by talent, but the bottom end of the education system, and the staff and the administration are not dependent upon, and accountable for, their efforts.

    The problem is worse in the academy, where, like the sale of medieval indulgences, the new academic religion is incentivized to maximize the throughput of students, in exchange for a diploma that grants them access to the workforce.

    This is the most evil system in history

  • 7) Educational reform by conversation to software gaming, esp at the expense of

    7) Educational reform by conversation to software gaming, esp at the expense of the teacher’s union. 8) university ed too is unnecessary dead weight on reproduction and economy, forcing immigration. 9) commercial real estate worthless, and 10) car travel to those locations waste.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-28 01:22:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321260975203491841

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321260974146523137


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    4) At present, trait-(dis)agreeablness determines tolerances (genetics). 5) But all tolerance for these conditions has a half-life. 6) If the duration continues more than another 12-18 months,then entertainment will never recover. Neither will education or commercial real estate.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1321260974146523137

  • They don’t have a Revolutionary Spirit, they have an UNDERMINING Spirit. They in

    They don’t have a Revolutionary Spirit, they have an UNDERMINING Spirit. They institutionalized the strategy of mean girls: bullying the good girls by rallying the bad girls against them. Once you understand it, it’s painful. Making an organized crime family out it was a novelty.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-27 03:07:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1320925116528791556

    Reply addressees: @Steve_Sailer @ArthurSchopenh7

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1320675455737868289

  • The Source Of The Civic Republican Tradition

    Max Weber’s General Economic History. Chapter 28 – Citizenship

    Outside the occident there have not been cities in the sense of a unitary community. Occidental cities originally arose through the establishment of a fraternity; it was in its beginnings first above all a defense group, an organization of those economically competent to bear arms, to equip and train themselves. These folks owned their own arms: this is key. In places like Egypt, Asia, India and China, irrigation was a big issue, and so kings’ bureaucracies developed. The king and his staff required the compulsory service of the dependent classes; they in turn were dependent on that bureaucracy. The king also held a military monopoly. In the west, self-equipment and religious brotherhoods (eg, crusaders) meant kings did not have a military monopoly, and so cities could be formed in a western sense, based on mutual defense. Also, ideas and institutions in the orient connected with magic, which supported such systems as caste systems, did not exist in such strength in the occident.

    From Politics As A Vocation

    The decisive means of politics is violence. … A state is defined by the specific means peculiar to it: the use of physical force. The state is a human community that successfully claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory. Politics, then, means striving to share power or striving to influence the distribution of power, either among states or among groups within a state. The state is a relation of men dominating men by means of legitimate violence.

    Basis of Legitimacy Legitimacy may be ascribed to an order by those subject to it in the following ways: 1) tradition, belief in legitimacy of what has always existed. 2) affected attitudes, legitimizing the validity of what is newly revealed or is a model to imitate. 3) rational belief in its absolute value. 4) legality. Readiness to conform with rules which are formally correct and have been imposed by accepted procedure. Submission to an order is almost always determined by a variety of motives.

  • The Source Of The Civic Republican Tradition

    Max Weber’s General Economic History. Chapter 28 – Citizenship

    Outside the occident there have not been cities in the sense of a unitary community. Occidental cities originally arose through the establishment of a fraternity; it was in its beginnings first above all a defense group, an organization of those economically competent to bear arms, to equip and train themselves. These folks owned their own arms: this is key. In places like Egypt, Asia, India and China, irrigation was a big issue, and so kings’ bureaucracies developed. The king and his staff required the compulsory service of the dependent classes; they in turn were dependent on that bureaucracy. The king also held a military monopoly. In the west, self-equipment and religious brotherhoods (eg, crusaders) meant kings did not have a military monopoly, and so cities could be formed in a western sense, based on mutual defense. Also, ideas and institutions in the orient connected with magic, which supported such systems as caste systems, did not exist in such strength in the occident.

    From Politics As A Vocation

    The decisive means of politics is violence. … A state is defined by the specific means peculiar to it: the use of physical force. The state is a human community that successfully claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory. Politics, then, means striving to share power or striving to influence the distribution of power, either among states or among groups within a state. The state is a relation of men dominating men by means of legitimate violence.

    Basis of Legitimacy Legitimacy may be ascribed to an order by those subject to it in the following ways: 1) tradition, belief in legitimacy of what has always existed. 2) affected attitudes, legitimizing the validity of what is newly revealed or is a model to imitate. 3) rational belief in its absolute value. 4) legality. Readiness to conform with rules which are formally correct and have been imposed by accepted procedure. Submission to an order is almost always determined by a variety of motives.

  • 1) What the enemy has proven, repeatedly, is that they are masters of organized

    1) What the enemy has proven, repeatedly, is that they are masters of organized crime against the commons: genetic, institutional, traditional, normative, and informational. And that the ‘technique’ is ethnocentrism false promise, baiting into hazard under plausible deniability.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-24 23:50:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1320150653247934465

  • False equivalencies: yes, we can govern with the humans we have, if we don’t exp

    False equivalencies: yes, we can govern with the humans we have, if we don’t expect behavior from them without institutions to enforce it. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/10/24/false-equivalencies-yes-we-can-govern-with-the-humans-we-have-if-we-dont-expect-behavior-from-them-without-institutions-to-enforce-it/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-24 20:17:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1320097056451665926

  • False equivalencies: yes, we can govern with the humans we have, if we don’t expect behavior from them without institutions to enforce it.

    —” That is exactly the problem I see in every political, ethical or moral claims. They never blame the system they create. It always guy XYZ fault. My program for human works perfectly but when I put the value “human” in it. It crashed. Dawm you… humans!!!”—

    Are you sure that makes sense? (No it doesn’t’)

    Does that mean that we should satisfy the demand for criminality? That’s what you’re saying. (Yes you are).

    There is a difference between trying to get humans to do something unequally good and prohibiting them from doing things that are equally bad (crime). 

    So yes, we can govern with the humans we have as long as we limit the reproduction of the undesirables, where undesirable is a demonstrated behavior (failure). Yes, we can govern with the humans we have, if we don’t expect behavior from them without institutions to enforce it. And if those institutions are possible. Via negativa defense of ourselves from predation is a universal demand.

    Humans are just like any other semi-domesticated animal. They require training. And some of them are beneficial and some are hazardous to others, the order that makes their quality of life possible, and the gene pool itself.

    I have no problem with the truth. Why do you? 😉

  • False equivalencies: yes, we can govern with the humans we have, if we don’t expect behavior from them without institutions to enforce it.

    —” That is exactly the problem I see in every political, ethical or moral claims. They never blame the system they create. It always guy XYZ fault. My program for human works perfectly but when I put the value “human” in it. It crashed. Dawm you… humans!!!”—

    Are you sure that makes sense? (No it doesn’t’)

    Does that mean that we should satisfy the demand for criminality? That’s what you’re saying. (Yes you are).

    There is a difference between trying to get humans to do something unequally good and prohibiting them from doing things that are equally bad (crime). 

    So yes, we can govern with the humans we have as long as we limit the reproduction of the undesirables, where undesirable is a demonstrated behavior (failure). Yes, we can govern with the humans we have, if we don’t expect behavior from them without institutions to enforce it. And if those institutions are possible. Via negativa defense of ourselves from predation is a universal demand.

    Humans are just like any other semi-domesticated animal. They require training. And some of them are beneficial and some are hazardous to others, the order that makes their quality of life possible, and the gene pool itself.

    I have no problem with the truth. Why do you? 😉

  • RT @Cernovich: A small minority of users create the vast majority of tweets from

    RT @Cernovich: A small minority of users create the vast majority of tweets from U.S. adults, and 69% of these highly prolific tweeters are…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-24 02:06:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1319822555713241096