Curt Doolittle

Theme: Institution

  • DEFEATING THE LEFT IS EASY -“Seems to me the entire objective of communism (Marx

    DEFEATING THE LEFT IS EASY

    -“Seems to me the entire objective of communism (Marxist) is for Abrahamists to be in control of every institution of global influence, the masses to be impoverished (lowest common denominator), ignorant, and dependent on those institutions, and to replace the White race.”-

    The reason for Marx’s hatred: European Capitalism’s organized investment in production, vs Jewish Financialism: organized investment in parasitism. Marx was fine with organized parasitism, poverty but socialized, but not with organized production and prosperous but re-socialized.

    The objective of marxism was underclass (labor) rule by revolutionary overthrow of meritocracy. Lenin understood this must be done by gaining political power. Then by violence against meritocratic peoples. When the underclass failed, Gramsci demanded the destruction of culture.

    As I have said since the beginning, (a) absence of our own ‘bible’ of western civ(Law) (b) tolerance for thought-competition under self-determination and trifunctionalism (c) roman failure to exterminate supernatural Christianity (d) remnants superstition, (e) make us vulnerable.

    The way we easily defeat cultural marxism, postmodernism, and the White-Hate’s march through the institutions of cultural production is by stating the foundations of the culture scientifically in law as a public asset that may not be harmed. The Legal market will do the rest.

    And as I have said since the beginning, my project is to produce that ‘bible’, and embed it in a constitution and use the natural incentives of markets to exterminate competition. This is possible b/c European civ (alone) fully reflects the formal, physical, natural, & evo laws.

    I just didn’t expect to discover (a) that European civ was in fact just the laws of the universe applied, and (b) Jesus’ teaching as the means by which the half-humans, slaves, and serfs unfit for civilization can not only tolerate but enjoy life through saturation in reciprocal love.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-27 15:41:18 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105628439506211315

  • The way we easily defeat cultural marxism, postmodernism, and the White-Hate’s m

    The way we easily defeat cultural marxism, postmodernism, and the White-Hate’s march through the institutions of cultural production is by stating the foundations of the culture scientifically in law as a public asset that may not be harmed. The Legal market will do the rest.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-27 03:41:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105625609272574929

  • The way we easily defeat cultural marxism, postmodernism, and the White-Hate’s m

    The way we easily defeat cultural marxism, postmodernism, and the White-Hate’s march through the institutions of cultural production is by stating the foundations of the culture scientifically in law as a public asset that may not be harmed. The Legal market will do the rest.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-27 03:40:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1354273142785667073

  • So this conflict of visions isn’t a question of risk of the technology itself to

    So this conflict of visions isn’t a question of risk of the technology itself to increasing evolutionary adaptation but to our failure of economic, legal, political, and institutional organization. My concern is not theoretical. It’s that we are negatively hybridizing once again.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-26 01:19:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353875052282966016

    Reply addressees: @SilverHareMedia @JFGariepy @Seanrothmans @WorMartiN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353873082906259462

  • ( Catching up ) So you are not objecting to the possibility or risk of the chang

    ( Catching up ) So you are not objecting to the possibility or risk of the changes but the behavioral or institutional consequences of abandoning sortition and selection? Or the convergence of a uniformity that would insert fragility? Or RP theory of creating our replacement?

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-25 17:31:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353757350935592966

    Reply addressees: @JFGariepy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353754235788210179

  • The abuse of the judicial system is one of the methods of undermining western ci

    The abuse of the judicial system is one of the methods of undermining western civilization. Dominion are funded by the enemy. An enemy that has openly declared its mission to destroy the united states of america.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-25 14:20:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353709353321320450

    Reply addressees: @axios

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353681787982139392

  • (The anglosphere has a kinship, cultural, institutional, military, and strategic

    (The anglosphere has a kinship, cultural, institutional, military, and strategic relationship – “a special relationship” – and Blair was demonstrating loyalty to that relationship at cost. At the time intel was sh-t but fit the narrative. It caused revolutionary reform in intel.)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-25 14:16:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353708445367754752

    Reply addressees: @jollyheretic

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353321213909737474

  • So what are the chances that Gab will become the Christian equivalent of FB/Twit

    So what are the chances that Gab will become the Christian equivalent of FB/Twitter?

    I’m a Jeffersonian Christian (Jesus was a philosopher, Churchianity was as evil a capture of his ideas as marxism-postmodernism-feminist-pc/woke-anti-whiteness is a capture of European science today. And the Jefferson bible the only living representation of Jesus’s solution to the hard problem of tolerating continuous adaptation to the laws of nature: love). And 90% of the hate I get is from Christians with a room temperature IQ.

    We were booted from FB by a conspiracy of the Nazis – not the left.
    Our movement was undermined by mouth breathing Christians – not the left.
    I’m constantly attacked by Christians – not the left.

    This is why the right fails
    Anti-intellectualism, Non cooperation, false merit, pride and virtue.
    Nazis, Ethnonationalists, Traditionalists, Civic Nationalists, Libertarians, Christians, Anarchists
    “I gotta have it my way even if we all lose because of it”
    The political philosophy of spoiled privileged children.
    .
    .
    .
    .
    (bait)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-24 17:09:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105611797741377974

  • Because christian ethics ARE a prominent feature of the culture, the traditions,

    Because christian ethics ARE a prominent feature of the culture, the traditions, the myths, the literature, the laws. Metaphysics aren’t explicit. They’re habituated. I can write the rules of christian ethics into secular law, as an extension of natural law. Archetype just HELPS.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-23 14:33:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352987723905294336

    Reply addressees: @library_van

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352985367683727360

  • “In Europe as well, up until about 1800, the wealthy had considerably more child

    “In Europe as well, up until about 1800, the wealthy had considerably more children than the poor. There was no public assistance for single mothers, so there were strict sanctions against illegitimacy. Women generally did not marry men who could not support them, and many people in the serving classes, therefore, did not marry or have children. And when the lower classes had illegitimate or unwanted children they often exposed them; dead babies were a common sight in gutters or on rubbish heaps.” The serial ‘killers’ with by far the largest numbers were women who disposed of unwanted babies. Unfortunately for archaeologists, Roman sewers were filled with them.My point is this: throughout history, women have killed far more babies than men have in wars. Women have killed three times as many babies by abortion(+60m) since 1973 as soldiers and civilians were killed in world war one(20m).  Men > War -vs- Women > Infanticide. Now tell me, what’s the difference? We both defend what we must. So, you know, I have less of a problem with the abortion argument than I do with infanticide. And I have more of a problem with common property, no fault divorce, alimony, child support, and welfare. Negative Feedback loops matter. Ergo: Dysgenia is rampant today.