Theme: Institution

  • IS GAB A GOOD PLATFORM AND A GOOD COMMUNITY? MAYBE. To be honest, I had almost g

    IS GAB A GOOD PLATFORM AND A GOOD COMMUNITY? MAYBE.

    To be honest, I had almost given up on the utility of Gab as a plaform worth my time until Doug Morrison @RadioFreeNorthwest hooked me in. I mean, I’m a long term supporter of Brett Stevens @alternative_right. I’ll always respect Greg Johnson (@counter_currents) and even Richard for their efforts. And sure I want Andrew @a to succeed. But I had maxed out FB friends and followers, and even on twitter, where i’m suppressed, I have 5K that slowly grows over time, but on Gab I have just over 1k. And that’s just … an algorithm problem.

    Because, well, I’d never heard of @Communism_Kills, @StephenClayMcGehee, @BillyRoper or @JohnYoungE. So as Brett says, there are IQ points here. And those IQ points aren’t playing click-games. But for some reason ‘the algorithm’ on gab isn’t encouraging us to find one another.

    So thanks to those of you who put in the effort of connecting communities together.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-08 19:20:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107243061528449832

  • You have to think of it from the Bureaucracy’s perspective. They need ‘permissio

    You have to think of it from the Bureaucracy’s perspective. They need ‘permission, direction, and operating rules’ in order to change from financial, political, and globalist system masters to serving the people once again – and mostly by protecting them from bad people again. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1457765714463444998

  • If, as I recommend, we regionalize manufacture of apartments, particularly desig

    If, as I recommend, we regionalize manufacture of apartments, particularly designs for three generations, down to what are effectively ‘dorms’ for single men, we can state fund, and mass-produce housing superior to the soviet model, while imposing severe behavioral restrictions.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-08 17:35:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457763774534983686

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457762945220362242


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    If as I recommend, we restore centralized design and production of homes, for rail distribution and local assembly, we can negotiate resource prices, standardize and reduce prices, reduce the cost of homes, end mc-houses, increase quality, (see 1920’s home catalogs).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1457762945220362242

  • If as I recommend, we restore centralized design and production of homes, for ra

    If as I recommend, we restore centralized design and production of homes, for rail distribution and local assembly, we can negotiate resource prices, standardize and reduce prices, reduce the cost of homes, end mc-houses, increase quality, (see 1920’s home catalogs).


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-08 17:32:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457762945220362242

  • If as I recommend, we provide ‘British ability to draw down against future liqui

    If as I recommend, we provide ‘British ability to draw down against future liquidity distributions (increases in money supply), we eliminate a lot of familial stresses. If we nationalize pensions, and insurance, and adopt Singapore retirement and medical we solve even more.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-08 17:29:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457762273850712071

  • If, as I recommend, we repatriate strategic industries, end income tax for manua

    If, as I recommend, we repatriate strategic industries, end income tax for manual labor (including drivers, craftsmen, construction, and one-man businesses) and eliminate interest on durable goods and homes, and distribute liquidity directly to families, we ‘fix’ most problems.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-08 17:28:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457761863358468101

  • Mises institute will terminate with the generation that began it, without reform

    Mises institute will terminate with the generation that began it, without reforming such that it abandons the ‘unethical and immoral’ ethics of Rothbard, and ‘corrects’ Mises, Rothbard and Hoppe such that it’s commensurable with Popper, Kuhn, Hayek, Turing and Doolittle. Sorry.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-08 16:56:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457753939512864776

    Reply addressees: @Bohm_Baller @BobMurphyEcon @billyj41

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457752925451784197


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Bohm_Baller @BobMurphyEcon @billyj41 All, Continuing the argument as to why Mises, Rothbard, Hoppe, and the MI group practice sophistry (pseudologic), pseudoscience, and pseudomathematics.
    https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1457739296664920066
    The libertarian community other than perhaps Hoppe isn’t even vaguely capable of holding this debate.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1457752925451784197

  • JAE: The reason Mises failed – and worse than all the others – is that he didn’t

    JAE: The reason Mises failed – and worse than all the others – is that he didn’t come to the conclusion as to why he was wrong: In Jewish civ, law, philosophy, and religion are combined into a conflated monologic. What he had discovered was LEGAL falsification of economic claims.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-08 16:26:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457746383457423367

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457746382471716865


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    JAE: Ergo: Mises combined Weber, Simmel, and someone (?)from the analytic movement, and failed in Economics as did Russel et all in logic, Brouwer in Math, Bridgman in Physics, and less so Popper in Philosophy of Science, by claiming a constructivist logic could produce closure.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1457746382471716865

  • GOOD THOUGHTS. My response: @sakovkt No idea why a church matters. It’s irreleve

    GOOD THOUGHTS. My response:

    @sakovkt No idea why a church matters. It’s irrelevent other than as an educational institution – and it’s been captured by a leftist educational institution that is hostile to the west.

    What matters is that our Law (logic), Constitution (contract), Institutions (organizations), policies (goals) under that constitution in those institutions, and our legislation, regulation, and insurance of those policies (actions) bias in favor the the production of the hierarchy of intergenerational family > craft > business > industry > and economy, such that the polity persists in a condition of prosperity and safety from competitors.

    We study everything EXCEPT law, when it is law, not religion or philosopy that is the foundation of the unique hyper adaptability of the west, and the reason for the stagnation and decline of the rest. Science is just the application of legal inquiry and decidability to all of man and nature.

    It is our law that gave us reason, empiricism, science, tecnology, medicing, and the mst rapidly evolving civilization in history, and the only one that escaped agrarian stagnation.

    Church morality and mindfulness for children, history and reason for youth, science and calculation for young adults, competition via economics for adults, and politics law and war for the best and wisest adults (Generalization), and pure mathematics and scientific research for the outliers (Specialization). This is the natural progression of one’s knowledge and agency in relation to one’s cognitive capacity.

    We need to restore monarchy (head of the people), nobility (head of a region of people), lesser nobility (head of localities), heads of families (the smallest political order) – but we must understand that the weakness of aristocratic inheritance is the need for ‘hiring specialist’, and limigint the nobility to ‘veto’ – which takes advantage of their intergenerational self interests and intersets for the people – while limiting their input to veto, and letting the people, the market, and the cabinets (management) determine wants and demands and means, within the limits of intergenerational persistence.

    In other words, the british had it right, adams had it right, and jefferson was enamoroed of the french, made a mistake. Had washington accepted the monarchy instead of refusing it, we would have improved on the english model in institutions. As such we only improved on it by writing down the constitution and the law.

    My work continues that process of ‘finishing’ the aryan rule of law, and christian civic love as a formal logic that is closed to ‘intepretation and abuse’ as is every other physical science.

    We can restore the west, but to do so we must separate fact from fiction, and evidence from intuition, and understand we must reform our constitution, our govenrment, our institutions, our policies, and yes, our religion, so that it is as ‘true’ as the physical sciences. Because that is what rule of law is.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-08 15:46:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107242220054512637

  • And as such colonization only succeeds via extraordinary use of population diffe

    And as such colonization only succeeds via extraordinary use of population differences, institutional differences, military differences, and usually technological and conceptual differences. Han China is the world master at colonization and integration without peer.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-08 15:02:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457725098337738754

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457724529661431809


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Eradication and replacement clearly works (Europe, N. America.) Colonization only works over very long periods (Han Chinese, Aryans in India) or with massive reproductive introgression (S. America), producing a hybrid people with hybrid and therefore competing identity.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1457724529661431809