RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Politics turning moral may be a signal of institutional capture.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 18:46:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592227550151200768
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Politics turning moral may be a signal of institutional capture.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 18:46:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592227550151200768
There is no collapse.
Participation is the greatest ever.
This acquisition deal is progressing like all others.
The difference is that the acquisition team must defend against more sabotage from within and conspiracy without.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 17:49:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592213261281538050
Reply addressees: @katevinitafitch
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592210330054426627
(Surprisingly, that’s not quite true. It’s just that the other CEO’s (myself included) simply aren’t as good at it. )
I’ve bought a lot of tech companies.
The ones that want to get bought are hard.
The ones that don’t are impossible.
But turnarounds are appreciated by EVERYONE.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 16:55:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592199564119117825
Reply addressees: @seinfeldguru @EvaFoxU @elonmusk @EricFrohnhoefer @MEAInd
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592162471678472192
It’s less likely developers are a problem than all the rest of the staff we KNOW is a problem.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 16:53:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592199039164026881
Reply addressees: @FSDbetaa @elonmusk @EricFrohnhoefer @MEAInd
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592159455378313217
Been there, and done that, Elon.
It’s the only way to do it.
Acquisition, especially unwanted, is not for the faint of heart.
Thanks for all you do.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 16:51:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592198575995629568
Reply addressees: @elonmusk @EricFrohnhoefer @MEAInd
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592159017270677504
So, we have completed the cycle of maximizing childhood, destroying marriage, destroying family, only to devolve to the previous natural state of man as serial marriages, and maximization of poverty by the doubling of household costs despite the end of our economic advantage.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 00:58:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1591958624091635713
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1591947067513262081
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
The reason you can’t reliably develop a relationship with, or marry single mothers, is that you can never enter the exchange of putting one another – and your relationship – first. Although if both you have children, that possibility increases. Single mom authoritarianism blocks.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1591947067513262081
And the consequence is that men & women will continue to have starter marriages w/w children, and adult marriages for family life, for the simple reason that feminism and feminization have led to infantilization that cannot be overcome without the hardship of adapting to reality.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 00:31:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1591951992909430787
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1591947067513262081
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
The reason you can’t reliably develop a relationship with, or marry single mothers, is that you can never enter the exchange of putting one another – and your relationship – first. Although if both you have children, that possibility increases. Single mom authoritarianism blocks.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1591947067513262081
If you don’t see where I’m heading, it’s that it’s entirely possible to marry a single mother with kids, if you write down (meaning set boundaries) a contract for behavior so that the man isn’t expecting more than is possible nor is the woman. Serial monogamy is the human norm.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 00:30:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1591951562729197568
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1591947067513262081
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
The reason you can’t reliably develop a relationship with, or marry single mothers, is that you can never enter the exchange of putting one another – and your relationship – first. Although if both you have children, that possibility increases. Single mom authoritarianism blocks.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1591947067513262081
And if that is sounding like a pre-industrial middle or upper-class marriage – then that’s right. And that’s my point. If you are looking for a 70’s marriage of reciprocal friendship, or 00’s marriage of reciprocal responsibiilty for happiness and entertainment, you’ll fail.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 00:26:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1591950765362380800
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1591947067513262081
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
The reason you can’t reliably develop a relationship with, or marry single mothers, is that you can never enter the exchange of putting one another – and your relationship – first. Although if both you have children, that possibility increases. Single mom authoritarianism blocks.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1591947067513262081
You didn’t really say this did you? How about this:we require journalists – meaning those with commercial interest in public speech – to meet standards of court testimony (reporting), and are liable for testifiability, reciprocity, proportionality like all other commercial goods.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-13 16:45:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1591834627882229760
Reply addressees: @chessninja @MaxBoot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1591233409560772609