Theme: Institution

  • (twitter change is working) THOUGHTS: GROWTH IN OUR REACH ON TWITTER CONTEXT Wha

    (twitter change is working)
    THOUGHTS: GROWTH IN OUR REACH ON TWITTER

    CONTEXT
    What I do: I use social media as a research, education, and talent recruiting vehicle.

    So for the first time in history, it’s possible to run ‘tests of demonstrated interest’ in unlimited contexts for zero cost. In other words, instead of running a survey, and collecting ‘reported’ behavior (mostly lying) one can create a question, proposition, or argument in almost any social or political context, and collect ‘demonstrated’ behavior (mostly truthful).

    Then I use the results of this research to explain sex, class, group, culture, domain, and civilizational differences, in cognition, value, method of persuasion, and method of deceit (with emphasis on deceit).

    And then I explain western civilization’s discovery, application, and adaptation to the laws of nature, and Western institutions that result, to explain the uniqueness of western civilization, and why ‘it evolves faster than all the rest combined in the bronze, iron, and steel ages.”

    And then I explain our constitution and our laws (and how to complete them) as the science of cooperation – not philosophy ideology or religion. And the minimum variation between our western institutions and the science explains the importance of those institutions and traditions and values.

    But more importantly, and most importantly, I unified the sciences, and science our civilization and its laws, and restated our constitution and our laws as a complete coherent science. Thereby ending the ability to use deception and ideology to undermine our civilization – perhaps forever.

    NOW, BACK TO TWITTER (AND FACEBOOK)
    I’d maxed out the friends etc on FB, and we had many many more silent followers. I only used Twitter to read news, not to post (much). The reason was, that **Twitter’s character limit prevented education, understanding, and argument, and instead fosters virtue signaling and moral outrage. Whereas Facebook’s Long form assisted in education, understanding, and discourse, which facilitated agreement – or at least agreement to disagree.**

    But a group of Nazis ran a deliberate cancel-campaign resulting in banning the institute members and me from FB.

    Now, for those who understand my research and teaching method using social media for King of the Hill Games, it’s easy to understand that when I was researching a taboo subject (most subjects of political importance), the content I would post could easily provoke offense – but that was the point of it: I wanted to ‘science’ the cognitive origin of biases, and the means of deception we use to advocate and defend them. (I’m mostly an epistemologist after all.) So, despite very cautious and deliberate construction, it was possible to mass-report posts to have us canceled.

    When I switched from FB to Twitter as my primary channel follower count went to about 4K in a month – then I was shadowbanned and removed from search results. And the number stayed relatively static.

    Since musk took over I’m gaining 1K followers per month. (That might not seem like a lot, but this is pretty cerebral content, with domain-specific vocabulary – the audience is only so large).

    And since Long Form Tweets are possible, I can return to educating, and discussing – though given we’re unable to curate responses to our tweets (delete comments from bad actors), keeping the discussion mature, intellectually honest, and constructive is still difficult. ( I’d spent an absurd amount of time curating my facebook feed.)

    And what I mean, is that bad actors poison discourses that would otherwise accumulate better eyeballs and followers.

    So with long-form, hopefully, I can continue to build an audience.

    I’m hoping to get to 10K in the next few months. I suspect we might over time reach 25k or more. But the pool of people who we can reach … I doubt it’s large.

    We had 2M on YT but that requires we return to populism and … that doesn’t work well for us. πŸ˜‰

    -FIN-


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 17:25:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628083493593919489

  • Why am I going to answer this given that I know it’s a waste of time? (a) northe

    Why am I going to answer this given that I know it’s a waste of time?

    (a) northern european institutions, especially within the Hajnal Line, Under Manorialism, and most so under the British invention of the modern state, maximized the responsibility of individuals through training, culture, religion, education, and law, and directed dominance expression to the production of commons. We sometimes call this the protestant ethic, but it is simply the northern european ethic, and protestantism was a natural reform of religion to suit the protestant ethic as we entered the age of literacy.
    (b) The “Liberal: Marxist, Neo-Marxist, Postmodern, Feminist, PC-Woke, anti-male, anti-western, anti-behavioral science” promise of freedom from scarcity, the nature of man, and evolutionary pressures of mutation and genetic load accumulating in the lower classes consist of a rebellion against the responsibility demanded by these western institutions. This has resulted in infantilization of the population: devolution. And infantilization increases the demand for authority (parenting).
    (c) We can (I have), fairly easily, enumerate natural rights and obligations that maximize individual self determination(freedom), by sovereignty (liberty) and reciprocity (morality), and in doing so reverse the infantilization of the population, and end the demand for authority.
    (d) however there are people who are incapable of ‘whiteness’: responsibility for mind, self, others, and commons – whether by genetic defect, developmental defect, or choice. Some of these people will ‘check out’ as artists etc. Some of these people will demand parenting. Some of them will demand that their irresponsibility grant them equality of standing with those who are responsible.
    So the last two groups are rather obvious. And they require ‘blue’ authority and parenting.

    Why? because agency decreases with population density, so responsibility decreases with population density, and so we give up agency and responsibility in return for the reduced opportunity costs of population density (hyperconsumption), and cost of residency, and near prohibition on reproduction because of the high cost of children in population density.

    So individuals will choose density, and families seek absence of density. Families breed in the absence of density. Individuals don’t breed in cities because it’s too expensive, so they have to attract immigrants instead, who also increase demand for authority.

    Good people will keep fleeing the decaying cities until there are alternative cities that attract good people. (Nashville, Austin). Then once enough good people create enough good things the parasitic bad people will come and destroy the good things again, and the process continues.

    We want to stop the bad people.

    It’s all behavioral economics. It’s very simple.
    And it’s just physics in the end and you can’t get around it.

    Cities are genetic sinks.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 19:09:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627747328286199829

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627743317357170690

  • You’d be wrong, because it’s how the country was founded, it’s how Europe is org

    You’d be wrong, because it’s how the country was founded, it’s how Europe is organized, and it’s how european civilization has always been organized, and that organization is the reason for the rapid evolution of western civilization over all of the rest – the competition for…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 17:51:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627727551232675842

    Reply addressees: @VladRomanyuk6 @mtgreenee

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627721371873574913

  • Minor adjustment: family and caste (IN), vs family and clan(ME), vs hierarchy of

    Minor adjustment: family and caste (IN), vs family and clan(ME), vs hierarchy of families (CN), vs family and commons (EU). There are only so many organizing possibilities and what’s interesting is that the surviving civilizations all chose a slightly different combination of strategy and organization. The open question I question so to speak, is whether competition between them had anything to do with it. Doesn’t appear so. Appears as different relations between the dominant warrior class and agrarian peasantry.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 06:41:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627558990300209153

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627556393325842434

  • AN INSIGHT INTO INDIAN CULTURAL ORGANIZATION The class-caste system is overlooke

    AN INSIGHT INTO INDIAN CULTURAL ORGANIZATION
    The class-caste system is overlooked as *the least fragile social, economic, political order* because organization is distributed and pushed down to the functional level and so the hierarchy can’t be captured as it can in the east and the west.

    The ME is equally difficult to capture but organization is at the family level ending the utility of class division of labor.

    To some degree it is useful to think of India’s organizing principle as military duty applied from ranks to castes, enabling continuous adaptation without the possible fragility of hierarchical orders.

    From this perspective, indian civ is in a ‘sweet spot’ above the middle east in cooperation and production, and below the east and west in fragility.

    (The west is most fragile but most adaptive, China is less fragile than the west, but more fragile than india, but like india pays high cost of stagnation, though because of the rigidity of the bureaucratic hierarchy (despite meritocracy) vs rigidity of the caste system (and problem of blocking meritocracy).)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 03:36:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627512492640423936

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627395423777263618

  • I”m pretty sure that most civic institutions were predominantly male, but the fe

    I”m pretty sure that most civic institutions were predominantly male, but the feminists, with intent, purpose, vigor, and design, destroyed all male fraternal organizations by demanding that women be allowed into them, thus eliminating their utility for men.

    I have a better idea. Why don’t we put men’s taxes in one pool for men, and women’s in one bucket for women, and have men and women vote on the use of their sex’s taxes.

    You know what you would discover? White males over 35 are the only net contributors to taxation.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 17:52:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627365581430177798

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626284551029792770

  • And just because this is still getting views: There is a difference between law,

    And just because this is still getting views:
    There is a difference between law, and lawyering.
    They teach legal activism, yes. Mostly.
    I don’t dispute they teach lawyering – the job.
    I question whether they teach jurisprudence.
    And they certainly don’t teach the science of law.…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 02:35:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627134671149490176

    Reply addressees: @Dopdoo4 @elonmusk @ScottAdamsSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626811808018477057

  • FEMA is as useless after hurricanes as the CDC and the WHO are for epidemics. Or

    FEMA is as useless after hurricanes as the CDC and the WHO are for epidemics. Organizing the private sector under the military or guard in times of crisis is the faster, easiest, and most powerful method of reacting to emergencies – not depending on an agency that does nothing useful at all.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-17 22:26:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626709685796478976

  • “The evening law school might disappear in ten years.”– Josh Blackman, South Te

    –“The evening law school might disappear in ten years.”– Josh Blackman, South Texas, Cato.

    Online only is draining enough revenue that night sessions might be impossible to fund.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-17 02:34:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626409802506067971

  • It’s called loyalty. It’s called education, knowledge, and experience. The monar

    It’s called loyalty.
    It’s called education, knowledge, and experience.
    The monarchy is central to the survival of rule of law.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-16 03:54:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626067565297512449

    Reply addressees: @DukurehLee @ValerieSentene1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626067010944659456