Theme: Incentives

  • He isn’t of higher material value, he’s higher entertainment and stimulation val

    He isn’t of higher material value, he’s higher entertainment and stimulation value. So now that marriage is not an independence or economic, but merely friendship alliance there is no motivation for a woman to forgo monkey branching.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-19 05:18:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1692768072757649841

    Reply addressees: @0xVossler @Areez22

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1692756773797785914

  • The absence of the monarchy would have no impact on that whatsoever. You’d have

    The absence of the monarchy would have no impact on that whatsoever. You’d have to be absolutely ignorant of basic economies to think so. There is always a pretense that if X isn’t done then Y can be instead, and this is the silly game silly people play in their heads, without imagining that the government has to find an agreement between the many different x’s and y’s.

    Now, in reality,why does she have children if that’s her condition other than her own irresponsibility, and exporting of her bad behavior, bad decisions onto the public? Why is it that the productivity outside of London has cratered? Why is it as someone who acquired companies around the world had so much trouble finding a company in the UK where people worked a full day, and took responsibility for producing what the job required? WHy are you letting the capital of the country be sold off to foreigners and immigrants at the expense of the wages and the living standard of the people, so that the government bureaucracy and financial sector can profit at the people’s expense?

    Blaming the monarchy just means you’re a sucker for propaganda by the enemy of your people.

    Reply addressees: @dnstewart67 @BladeoftheS


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-17 22:01:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1692295509585633280

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1692294163541164530

  • I don’t think you understand money very well, but 100B in the military is a posi

    I don’t think you understand money very well, but 100B in the military is a positive multiplier. Whereas the 3T on trying to prolong the correction, and the catastrophic response to the covid event were negative multipliers.

    In other words, without the US military Americans…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-17 15:47:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1692201601736307102

    Reply addressees: @STLdecaco @erikbrus25 @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1692190913970528394

  • I can’t help you son. What happens to Americans without the american military su

    I can’t help you son.
    What happens to Americans without the american military suppression of empires, the free trade that results, the american dollar for clearance of that free trade? What constitutions are better than those we have now? (I know the answer, do you?). And yes it’s obvious to Japanese given their history with China that they are better off constraining the CCP until China like every other country converts to rule of law, leaving on ly north Korea, Russia, and Iran the remaining threats to civilized peoples.
    I know because this is what I do for a living.
    The average Brit is as poor as the average Missisipian..
    What will happen to you with a 40%-60% decrease in purchasing power, 25% unemployment, and total collapse of the social security, medicaide, medicare, and credit system?

    Reply addressees: @PepeFisher @TheAutistocrat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-16 00:17:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691604952475475968

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691603374272041320

  • “I’ve literally heard it from multiple girls that they flirt with every man they

    –“I’ve literally heard it from multiple girls that they flirt with every man they meet as a business strategy. Then they get resentful with men when men don’t take them seriously.”–

    This isn’t really new. It’s that women used to be conscious of it; then feminism denied it to evade responsibility for it and instead criticized men for their lack of emotional intelligence; and now women can’t deny it – and don’t feel the need to.

    I’m usually either surprised (some employee trires to seduce me), offended (insulted that they think it would work), or immune (when they aren’t conscious of just ‘being female’.). But women are always offended because they take it personally when their femininity has no influential or coercive power – at which point they try to undermine you personally or socially (in the workplace) instead.

    Other than the relatively frequent false accusations that executives are biased against women, instead of it used to be rare that women could engage men on an equally empirical basis with the same degree of loyalty to men as men deliver to men, this ‘female’ behavior is the most irritating for executives in the workplace.

    I can easily crush and have the attempt of women in an organization to pull off their manipulation games, especially to organize them – simply by making their behavior public and transparent, and openly licensing the organization to suppress it.

    But the individual behavior of women and their inescapable desire to constantly manipulate, undermine, and socially construct, even when they don’t organize is a constant struggle to prevent dysfunction in an organization.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 18:10:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691150333328670720

  • RT @WerrellBradley: SUPPLY, DEMAND and DISOVERY Working with Mr. Doolittle today

    RT @WerrellBradley: SUPPLY, DEMAND and DISOVERY

    Working with Mr. Doolittle today, and we discovered that at all levels of complexity (in t…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-13 18:43:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690796222888435712

  • Women are conformists and will adapt to what other women do – only after it’s ob

    Women are conformists and will adapt to what other women do – only after it’s obvious that it’s to their advantage. The only question is when will it become obvoius. Some theorists think sooner, some of us later. I think it will require the loss of a generation (happening now) which will cause unrecoverable consequences and a dramatic need for change. But people often ‘wise up’ before that. And minor changes in the law will restore ratioal incentives, and the continued world contraction of standard of living (continuing class stagnation) will provide that incentive.

    Reply addressees: @Georgia__Swann @lovelywhite110


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-12 23:55:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690512386719932416

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690508012463476736

  • So it’s our job to make the willing discover the advantage to it, and adopt it f

    So it’s our job to make the willing discover the advantage to it, and adopt it for practical reasons rather than ideological moral or spiritual. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-12 23:19:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690503388666957825

    Reply addressees: @WalterIII

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690501271823036416

  • RT @JFGariepy: I made a live wish that @elonmusk would reduce the minimal impres

    RT @JFGariepy: I made a live wish that @elonmusk would reduce the minimal impression threshold for ad revenue sharing to 5 million instead…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-11 15:59:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690030173524049920

  • Q: “Curt: Can we put the divorce industry out of business?”– Well, that’s the i

    –Q: “Curt: Can we put the divorce industry out of business?”–

    Well, that’s the issue, isn’t it?

    We’re proposing a set of policies that should correct the incentives. They include, first, providing a middle option of temporary partnership by exchange of power of attorney, and agreement on the ownership of assets (his or hers to be kept, and ours to be sold) without insurance by the polity of the relationship, ending child support and alimony. And second, restoring marriage under the same criteria above, with insurance by the polity by restoration of liability for interference in the marriage and family by external and internal parties.

    But there is a hard question here:

    1) Do we want to do what is good for the polity at the cost of responsibility that imposes on our freedom of self-reward?

    Or
    2) Do we want to do what provides people with the most freedom and least responsibility at the cost of the continuity and quality of the people in the polity?

    And
    3) If we choose #1, then how can we bring that about when so many wish to escape that responsibility (especially women) now that we know the sexual revolution and the enfranchisement of women was a catastrophe? Is it possible democratically? Or must it be done coercively – as essentially paying ‘tax’ by the burden of responsibility for the production of generations of humans?

    So yes we can put the divorce industry nearly out of business, and ewe can and must put the family court out of business, and in doing so remove the state from marriage once again.

    Reply addressees: @dissidentwrath


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-08 17:59:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688973138736910346

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688970120503169050