RT @NoahRevoy: Brining in immigrants from third world countries will not fix the supposed labor shortage, it will actually make it worse.…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 08:07:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707306116151931196
RT @NoahRevoy: Brining in immigrants from third world countries will not fix the supposed labor shortage, it will actually make it worse.…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 08:07:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707306116151931196
Non-college-educated whites are not insulated from either the physical world, diverse populations, individual responsibility or market forces. They are also oddly better informed. And they are unable to get away with false virtue signaling and so less able to preserve illusions. They are also the only population that is reproducing at above replacement level.
Issue: college education for the majority of women does not convey any competency but grants access to clerical work that does not require physical labor. It also means that these women, by and large, have meaningless degrees, and more than a few of these degrees pay less than no education at all. Teachers, for example, are from the bottom 15 percent of their classes, are one of the two professions most likely to engage in infidelity (nurses being the other), and in keeping with female averages, about 30% are burdened with some sort of mental illness.
I’ve done the work on these issues, and here is the truth:
Republicans are smarter than Democrats.
Democrats are waaaaay more criminal than Republicans
Liberals are smarter than conservatives (ask why? #’s)
libertarians are the smartest of all.
Why these are true is rather obvious given the size of the different populations that identify by these terms.
The problem with most of the data is that authors are using degrees as a proxy for IQ, instead of IQ tests and SAT scores by degree. This is a good way to fool the (ignorant) population but … not people who know better.
Reply addressees: @RyanGirdusky @AnnCoulter
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 05:48:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707271133739761665
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707226421171474435
Meta is still pursuing gimmicks instead of user value. This company needs to disappear or be taken over and given the Twitter treatment,
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 19:13:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707111266462953529
When the first ads within games came out, I think it was within Counter-Strike, I thought ‘this is the end of the industry’. It will kill the game industry.
And I’m still convinced that any in game monetization is the equivalent of porn, social media, and media-propaganda.
And no I haven’t played a computer game for a year, and even then for two weeks as a birthday present to myself. And before that I don’t think since 2012.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 19:11:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707110641557786624
—“Q: Curt: Why are corporations allowed to own houses anyway? Do they use them for their employees?”—
If you are referring to the tendency of capital-rich investment companies buying up properties and by doing so raising the price of properties, at the same time interest rates are rising, thereby causing ordinary people to suffer the loss of opportunity for a home – then yes, this SHOULD be a violation of the prohibition on market manipulation by causing price appreciation without contributing to production.
Our organization aims to correct this problem permanently, though explaining it here in detail would produce a wall of text that the normies generally complain about. Let’s just say instead, that solving this problem is relatively simple, and fixing the entire financial and consumer credit system is also relatively simple.
The question is, will you vote into power the people who will do it, or will you show up in the millions to demand it if not.
We have worked very hard to solve every substantive problem that emerged due to our economic and political experiments in the twentieth century. We have the greatest set of policies ready to implement since the Roman Reforms.
But no one is going to listen to us, or to you, until we show up at the polls, or show up in protest, and demand, as did our founders, a common law suit against the state for the redress of grievances.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @Dontcar25448459 @StephenThomasHC
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 17:18:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707082294060584960
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707079331489398980
“Essential Education” is simply a demonstrated falsehood. Education is the worst return on our money in the entirety of the budget. The evidence is consistent that direction of education has been debilitating for economy and polity and society since the 1960s.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-26 16:17:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706704463509987806
Reply addressees: @CityLab
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706690155736707288
NO SOCIAL SECURITY AND WELFARE CANT INCREASE – OR SURVIVE
—“Social security and welfare could easily do what a “traditional” family (assuming the lone breadwinner is paid enough to thrive in an inflated economy) does if federal and state governments actually invested in those…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 15:55:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706336674341433850
Reply addressees: @jstabastrdchild @schizarella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706309128950304816
NO SOCIAL SECURITY AND WELFARE CANT INCREASE – OR SURVIVE
—“Social security and welfare could easily do what a “traditional” family (assuming the lone breadwinner is paid enough to thrive in an inflated economy) does if federal and state governments actually invested in those programs.”—
That’s simply not true. It’s horrifically NOT true.
Social Security: Roughly 23% of the federal budget.
Medicare: Approximately 15% of the federal budget.
Medicaid: Around 9% of the federal budget.
Welfare: Around 2% of the federal budget.
Adding these together, mandatory programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid consume approximately 49% of the federal budget. (Half of all taxes already go to these programs.)
Add 9% for federal employees and contractors and you’re at 58%.
Now, add that the deficit each year – meaning taxes not collected, and therefore money borrowed by the government – has recently varied from 22% before covid to 47% under covid.
So at the low end, where:
Mandatory Spending: 47% of the total federal budget
Actual Revenue: 78% of the total federal budget
So of the ‘real’ taxes collected, that means at least 60% of federal revenue goes to those categories of mandatory spending
In other words, there is zero chance that these programs will survive into the future given demographic rates of reproduction and the quality “capabilities” of the populations we are immigrating. In other words, dropping our country’s IQ from 100 to 97 is already visible in effects, and we will shortly hit 95, which puts us in a second world instead of first world economy.
We are entering a crisis today as world geoeconomics, geopolitics, and geostrategy equilibrate, ending our western institutional, cultural, scientific, technological, genetic, and demographic advantage.
We will enter yet another crisis quite soon as the delay in reforming the benefits system to RESTORE dependence on the family for our poverty, health, and elder care, directly by the family, or indirectly through taxes on the productivity of the children when they mature.
Because while y’all seem to think the government is rich, it’s not. It’s just another college kid running up credit cards without the job or income to pay them down, and while we can go bankrupt against consumer debt, when it comes to Benefits programs, the debt is to ourselves – so we lose either way.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 15:55:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706336674043576320
Not really sure why you are taking this position nor why you don’t understand the obvious data on divorce rates. But while it is fractionally better it’s still foolish to wed and have children today. And I don’t comprehend why you’d counter signal that fact. Men are acting rationally in response to the incentives.
End community property, alimony, and child support – and restore liability for fault in, or interfering in a marriage, and behavior will adapt.
Single motherhood data is convincing as well: it’s been a disaster.
Reply addressees: @MatthewParrott
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 15:05:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706324149268815872
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706076041406472283
I operate from the premise that competent people can live among us if their malincenties are curbed by law and counter-incenties to prosecute their tendencies to sedition whether feminine, class, or cultural.
This is my job, conflict prevention.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 15:50:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705972934764838979