Curt Doolittle

Theme: Incentives

  • FEMINISTS: BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR The first problem for any society is to

    FEMINISTS: BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR

    The first problem for any society is to find positive incentives for men.

    Feminism seeks to position men as oppressors – instead of our traditional roles as a compromise. But it is a compromise for both genders.

    For most of us, Islamic paternal domination, and daily tribal warfare, or African enslavement of women is a more desirable way to live than the tedium of labor, office, tax, law and family.

    In the family, women compromise and men compromise. But, If not, then men will no longer compromise either. They will first abandon society. Then family. Then pursue self interest.

    5%,unhappy women just complain. 5% unhappy men without access to sex and marriage cause revolutions every time.

    And or tribes are not equal in aggression. The relative docility of Asian males should not obscure the relative aggressiveness of steppe and desert males.

    So we compromise or be subjugated. None of us gets our ideal.

    Any soldier will in confidence confess that robbing, raping and pillaging is far preferable to sedentary life.

    The Romans made a business of it. The Muslims are currently making entertainment out of it.

    Men build the world for the benefit of and approval of women.

    We can just as easily destroy it if that incentive ends.

    Women are along for the ride.

    Be careful what you wish for.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-23 04:25:00 UTC

  • Feminists: Be Careful What You Wish For

    [T]he first problem for any society is to find positive incentives for men.

    Feminism seeks to position men as oppressors – instead of our traditional roles as a compromise. But it is a compromise for both genders.

    For most of us, Islamic paternal domination, and daily tribal warfare, or African enslavement of women is a more desirable way to live than the tedium of labor, office, tax, law and family.

    In the family, women compromise and men compromise. But, If not, then men will no longer compromise either. They will first abandon society. Then family. Then pursue self interest.
    5%,unhappy women just complain. 5% unhappy men without access to sex and marriage cause revolutions every time.

    And or tribes are not equal in aggression. The relative docility of Asian males should not obscure the relative aggressiveness of steppe and desert males.

    So we compromise or be subjugated. None of us gets our ideal.

    Any soldier will in confidence confess that robbing, raping and pillaging is far preferable to sedentary life.

    The Romans made a business of it. The Muslims are currently making entertainment out of it.

    Men build the world for the benefit of and approval of women.

    We can just as easily destroy it if that incentive ends.

    Women are along for the ride.

    Be careful what you wish for.

  • Feminists: Be Careful What You Wish For

    [T]he first problem for any society is to find positive incentives for men.

    Feminism seeks to position men as oppressors – instead of our traditional roles as a compromise. But it is a compromise for both genders.

    For most of us, Islamic paternal domination, and daily tribal warfare, or African enslavement of women is a more desirable way to live than the tedium of labor, office, tax, law and family.

    In the family, women compromise and men compromise. But, If not, then men will no longer compromise either. They will first abandon society. Then family. Then pursue self interest.
    5%,unhappy women just complain. 5% unhappy men without access to sex and marriage cause revolutions every time.

    And or tribes are not equal in aggression. The relative docility of Asian males should not obscure the relative aggressiveness of steppe and desert males.

    So we compromise or be subjugated. None of us gets our ideal.

    Any soldier will in confidence confess that robbing, raping and pillaging is far preferable to sedentary life.

    The Romans made a business of it. The Muslims are currently making entertainment out of it.

    Men build the world for the benefit of and approval of women.

    We can just as easily destroy it if that incentive ends.

    Women are along for the ride.

    Be careful what you wish for.

  • YA’. Crows move to the city to increase choice of mates and choice of career, th

    http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/think-millennials-prefer-the-city-think-again/TOLD YA’.

    Crows move to the city to increase choice of mates and choice of career, then move to the suburbs to build family and career. It’s basic economics. It’s too expensive in the city for the middle class, and too expensive in the suburbs for the lower class. That means cities are sink holes for the top and bottom.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-22 02:14:00 UTC

  • It is EXTREMELY difficult to write without appealing to intuition. I work at it

    It is EXTREMELY difficult to write without appealing to intuition. I work at it constantly – to require all statements to be reducible to propertarian incentives. And it’s still hard to do.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-21 03:43:00 UTC

  • We are all normatively different, circumstantially different, but biologically e

    We are all normatively different, circumstantially different, but biologically equal, and due equal returns regardless of our contributions?

    uh huh… And you call religious people nuts?

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-14 08:05:00 UTC

  • markets, innovations, not rational constructivism, paternalistic managerialism,

    https://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=ASL4cwU_3tc”Property, markets, innovations, not rational constructivism, paternalistic managerialism, and humanitarian welfare statism.”– Skye Stewart.

    So. Um. “NO”.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-09 01:15:00 UTC

  • Is it just me, or is progressivism reducible to a search for reasons to feel goo

    Is it just me, or is progressivism reducible to a search for reasons to feel good about yourself without having to actually do anything productive, or bear any cost?

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-01 16:17:00 UTC

  • “Yatsenyuk boasted that Ukraine has decreased its dependence from Russian gas an

    “Yatsenyuk boasted that Ukraine has decreased its dependence from Russian gas and increased gas imports from the European Union – from five percent in 2013 to 67 percent or more than five billion of cubic meters, according to estimates in 2014.

    The state aparatus was cut by 25,000 workers in 2014 and will be cut by 50,000 in 2015, Yatsenyuk said. Some 26 regulatory bodies were liquidated out of 52 that existed before, he said and the number of taxes cut from 22 to 11.

    “These reforms are not effective for the government I lead for one reason – the (results) require time. Next government and next prime minister will win from these reforms,” he said. “After my tenure the chances to keep my political ranking (high) are very, very low. But this is my choice and I realize the consequences.”

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-01 15:09:00 UTC

  • When we attempt to promote Austrian Economics, we could, if we were intelligent,

    When we attempt to promote Austrian Economics, we could, if we were intelligent, state that our interests are merely in developing institutions that facilitate voluntary exchanges, rather than mainstream economics, which attempts to maximize involuntary transfers.

    In other words, we practice moral economics, and mainstream practices immoral economics.

    It does no good whatsoever for advocates of Austrian Econ to make the false claims, or that mainstream does not practice our definition of ‘economics’, nor that their work is unscientific, nor that ours is somehow scientific even though it does not adhere to the warranties of scientific claims. All of these statements are mere verbalisms — they’re deceitful at worst, and merely ignorant at best.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-27 06:15:00 UTC