Curt Doolittle

Theme: Incentives

  • What Are The Key Differences Between Nordic Socialism And Other Flavors Of Socialism, And Is There An Example Of Nation That Has Prospered Under It?

    Nordics do not practice socialism but very high levels of taxation and redistribution. They are highly capitalist economies.  The reasons that they can achieve this state are that

    1. Northern europeans have been selectively eliminating the troublesome lower part of the gene pool for thousands of years (impulsivity and IQ under 80.)  Cold weather, short summers, darkness, manorialism, lots of hanging, no immigration from north Africa, Levant,  central Asia, steppe, or Asia to damage the gene pool.)
    2. These are very small countries.
    3. They have no diversity to create political conflict over redistributed wealth.
    4. They have no competitors on their borders to meaningfully defend against.
    5. They are bordered by near kin who have similar values and are not competitors.
    6. They are educated protestants exposed to Hanseatic and pre-Hansa cultures for many centuries.
    7. Northern european women have been able to use property and breed late for centuries.

    (BTW: I get very tired of these fake questions dreamed up by paid workers in india in order to generate clicks.)

    https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-key-differences-between-Nordic-socialism-and-other-flavors-of-socialism-and-is-there-an-example-of-nation-that-has-prospered-under-it

  • If I ask you to try to make one fully Propertarian argument that reduces your ex

    If I ask you to try to make one fully Propertarian argument that reduces your explanation of behavior to acquisitions costs and discounts you might think it is hard. But if you do one a day for three months then you will be able to do it forever.

    What are they trying to acquire ?

    How are they trying to get a discount?

    Why are they avoiding an exchange instead of engaging in Fraud?

    What would our team trade them in exchange for what they want?

    Answer these four questions.

    That is all there is to it.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-17 13:48:00 UTC

  • are three basic movements in economics. We unfortunately name them by their orig

    https://www.quora.com/Whats-the-difference-between-Keynesian-economics-and-Austrian-economics/answer/Curt-DoolittleThere are three basic movements in economics. We unfortunately name them by their origins rather than their goals

    Austrian economics seeks to eliminate symmetries of information so that people can cooperate more effectively. In this sense Austrian economics is an attempt to create a social science of cooperative institutions – political economy. More importantly the objective is to improve information. T is also the most eugenic system.

    Chicago/freshwater/monetarist economics seeks to create formula for the non discretionary interference in the economy to correct against shocks, and thereby adding the economy to our existing tradition of rule of law. The information distortion then is not open to discretion and manipulation, and people are not made victims of Human error and bias. This system retains eugenic reproduction and savings and intervene rational lending but allows the public to insure itself agains shocks. It also prevents the creation and export of risk by one generation into another.

    Keynesian /left/freshwater economics seeks to increase consumption and therefore employment by the constant adjustment of the economy using policy and discretion as is done under the Continental system of law. This system seeks the maximum distortions possible and the maximum redistribution possible. It is also the most dysgenic system. It has destroyed the system of intergenerational rational lending, and has led to the export of risk.

    I am happy to debate this issue with any economist or philosopher living. But I seriously don’t think that anyone with the knowledge to conduct that debate would do so.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-17 06:48:00 UTC

  • keeper. Weaponry for your kit. We have always had mixed economies and always wil

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-after-socialism-and-capitalism/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv&share=6348c1e4A keeper. Weaponry for your kit.

    We have always had mixed economies and always will. Neither extreme is possible since under pure capitalism commons cannot be produced because incentives to produce them don’t exist, and under pure socialism productiin is impossible in no small part because incentives to produce don’t exist.

    These two terms are also questionably dishonest. Capitalism refers to the voluntary organisation of production of consumption and commons. Socialism to the involuntary organisation of production of consumption and commons.

    There no post capitalism. It is possible that there is a pure contractualism variant available to us and I am working on that solution.

    But it as long as women can bear children at will without certain to if the ability to support them or their eventual self support, then there will always be intolerable want.

    The he egalitarianism of Northern Europe was achieved through centuries of systemic eugenics. And westerners do not like to admit this truth rather than attribute their current luxury is the product of their character.

    Hanjal line character is the product of dispassionate eugenics in all walks of life.

    The early northern people delayed reproduction and out red. the anglo Saxons starting in the Netherlands practiced manorialism. the rest of europe hung half to one percent of the population every year as entertainment.

    It is far more important for a people to eliminate the evil 80s from the population than it is to create genius.

    This knowledge is the crisis of our age. mixed economies have won. There is no end to capitalism in the consumer economy and socialism in the commons economy.

    Not as long as we are discussing humans.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-17 06:31:00 UTC

  • No interest on consumer purchases (consumption) for the duration of the warranty

    No interest on consumer purchases (consumption) for the duration of the warranty.

    Esp. no interest on home and land loans for principle residence.

    Linear interest / Principle payments.

    All liquidity distributed directly to consumers by debit card.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-17 02:05:00 UTC

  • What Causes Racism?

    People think and speak aware of race because people act aware of race.

    1. People vote as racial blocks. And therefore firm political competition for status and rent seeking.
    2. People associate in racial blocks.
    3. People work in racial blocks.
    4. People reside in racial blocks.
    5. Vast differences in reproductive desirability between races.  And people mate in racial blocks except at the margins.
    6. Vast differences in the eugenic elimination of the evil 80s underclasses between racial blocks.
    7. Vast differences in criminality between the racial blocks.
    8. Significant differences in the abilities of racial groups because of the failure to suppress reproduction in the lower classes.

    We are different. People are rational. They act rationally. Humans practice kin selection.  They must.  Or those that do practice kin selection will replace them.

    Cooperation between families and tribes is only beneficial if each perceives a benefit. Otherwise instead of arguing against racism one is merely practicing war by a substitute of religion, rather than war by religion or war by violence.

    https://www.quora.com/What-causes-racism

  • What Is After Socialism And Capitalism?

    We have always had mixed economies and always will. Neither extreme is possible since under pure capitalism commons cannot be produced because incentives to produce them don’t exist, and under pure socialism production is impossible in no small part because incentives to produce don’t exist. 

    These two terms are also questionably dishonest. Capitalism refers to the voluntary organization of production of consumption and commons. Socialism to the involuntary organization of production of consumption and commons. 

    There is no state of post capitalism. It is possible that there is a form of pure contractualism available to us – and I am working on that solution.

    But as long as women can bear children at will without certain to if the ability to support them or their eventual self support, then there will always be intolerable want.

    The egalitarianism of Northern Europe was achieved through centuries of systemic eugenics under manorialism and its predecessors. And westerners do not like to admit this truth. They’d rather attribute their current luxury to the product of their character.

    Hanjal line character is the product of dispassionate eugenics in all walks of life.

    The early northern people delayed reproduction and outbred. The anglo Saxons starting in the Netherlands practiced manorialism. The rest of Europe hung half to one percent of the population every year as entertainment and constant suppression of the criminal underclasses.  The peasantry was not oppressed – it was domesticated.

    It is far more important for a people to eliminate the ‘Evil 80s’ from the population than it is to create genius.

    This knowledge is the crisis of our age. mixed economies have won. There is no end to capitalism in the consumer economy and socialism in the commons economy.

    Not as long as we are discussing humans. 

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-after-socialism-and-capitalism

  • What Is After Socialism And Capitalism?

    We have always had mixed economies and always will. Neither extreme is possible since under pure capitalism commons cannot be produced because incentives to produce them don’t exist, and under pure socialism production is impossible in no small part because incentives to produce don’t exist. 

    These two terms are also questionably dishonest. Capitalism refers to the voluntary organization of production of consumption and commons. Socialism to the involuntary organization of production of consumption and commons. 

    There is no state of post capitalism. It is possible that there is a form of pure contractualism available to us – and I am working on that solution.

    But as long as women can bear children at will without certain to if the ability to support them or their eventual self support, then there will always be intolerable want.

    The egalitarianism of Northern Europe was achieved through centuries of systemic eugenics under manorialism and its predecessors. And westerners do not like to admit this truth. They’d rather attribute their current luxury to the product of their character.

    Hanjal line character is the product of dispassionate eugenics in all walks of life.

    The early northern people delayed reproduction and outbred. The anglo Saxons starting in the Netherlands practiced manorialism. The rest of Europe hung half to one percent of the population every year as entertainment and constant suppression of the criminal underclasses.  The peasantry was not oppressed – it was domesticated.

    It is far more important for a people to eliminate the ‘Evil 80s’ from the population than it is to create genius.

    This knowledge is the crisis of our age. mixed economies have won. There is no end to capitalism in the consumer economy and socialism in the commons economy.

    Not as long as we are discussing humans. 

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-after-socialism-and-capitalism

  • Incentives ar enough. The problem is not art but theatre and movie

    Incentives ar enough. The problem is not art but theatre and movie.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 08:38:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710022492715360256

  • Modern art (Design), which is a form of decoration that is cheaply produced, is

    Modern art (Design), which is a form of decoration that is cheaply produced, is not a ‘bad’ so much as just cheap.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 08:38:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710022296690413568

    Reply addressees: @CanadaNRx @ne0colonial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710014846289485824

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710014846289485824