Curt Doolittle

Theme: Incentives

  • ^and what is it that allows you to fund such things in norway (oil) and canada (

    ^and what is it that allows you to fund such things in norway (oil) and canada (selling off land to immigrants)?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 21:39:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954830662330126337

    Reply addressees: @ReneeStephen @kjhealy @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954784124761337856

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954784124761337856

  • The evidence of the 20th century experiment is in. it’s a failure. For the very

    The evidence of the 20th century experiment is in. it’s a failure. For the very reason that democracy and socialism have always been failures: the inability to prevent consumption to the point of maximum rents that produces inability to adapt to shocks.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 18:38:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954785329097166853

    Reply addressees: @ReneeStephen @kjhealy @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954784124761337856

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954784124761337856

  • The Incentives For Secession In Rational Terms

    The unification of north and south in the declaration and constitution was always contentious. We had our first attempt at secession just after the war of 1812. Our next in the civil war. vast immigration and the depression that followed, disunity. The world wars created unity. The marxist/postmodern insurgency restored the original demands for secession. The reason for the original failure was fear of re-conquest by europe. The reason for the civil war failure was the profitability of the westward expansion and the threat that the industrialized north would be reduced to a marginalized minority and the west and the south the majority – and slavery is merely the primary driver by which that economic and political reality was perpetuated. The 1960s repeated the process. ANd today we are going thru it again. The difference today is we are no longer fighting over the profitability of westward expansion, but the profitability of homogeneous territorial peoples and heterogeneous. Or stated differently “the profits from immigration as a vehicle for selling off a conquered conteintent, and the profits of selling them consumer goods, is now neutralized by the world having caught up to western technology and institutions. What the world cannot catch up to is western demographics and culture. Becuase as far as I know no other people are capable of it. The means of future competition are (a) eugneics (b) artificial intelligence (c) demographic distribution and population Now, technology ALWAYS EVENTUALLY AND QUCKLY EQUILIBRATES. GENES DO NOT. DO YOU UNDERSTAND? You cannot clean ‘polluted genes’. You can only separate good genes from bad Genes.

  • THE INCENTIVES FOR SECESSION IN RATIONAL TERMS The unification of north and sout

    THE INCENTIVES FOR SECESSION IN RATIONAL TERMS

    The unification of north and south in the declaration and constitution was always contentious. We had our first attempt at secession just after the war of 1812. Our next in the civil war. vast immigration and the depression that followed, disunity. The world wars created unity. The marxist/postmodern insurgency restored the original demands for secession. The reason for the original failure was fear of re-conquest by europe. The reason for the civil war failure was the profitability of the westward expansion and the threat that the industrialized north would be reduced to a marginalized minority and the west and the south the majority – and slavery is merely the primary driver by which that economic and political reality was perpetuated. The 1960s repeated the process. ANd today we are going thru it again.

    The difference today is we are no longer fighting over the profitability of westward expansion, but the profitability of homogeneous territorial peoples and heterogeneous. Or stated differently “the profits from immigration as a vehicle for selling off a conquered conteintent, and the profits of selling them consumer goods, is now neutralized by the world having caught up to western technology and institutions. What the world cannot catch up to is western demographics and culture. Becuase as far as I know no other people are capable of it.

    The means of future competition are

    (a) eugneics

    (b) artificial intelligence

    (c) demographic distribution and population

    Now, technology ALWAYS EVENTUALLY AND QUCKLY EQUILIBRATES.

    GENES DO NOT.

    DO YOU UNDERSTAND?

    You cannot clean ‘polluted genes’. You can only separate good genes from bad Genes.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 11:15:00 UTC

  • The Incentives For Secession In Rational Terms

    The unification of north and south in the declaration and constitution was always contentious. We had our first attempt at secession just after the war of 1812. Our next in the civil war. vast immigration and the depression that followed, disunity. The world wars created unity. The marxist/postmodern insurgency restored the original demands for secession. The reason for the original failure was fear of re-conquest by europe. The reason for the civil war failure was the profitability of the westward expansion and the threat that the industrialized north would be reduced to a marginalized minority and the west and the south the majority – and slavery is merely the primary driver by which that economic and political reality was perpetuated. The 1960s repeated the process. ANd today we are going thru it again. The difference today is we are no longer fighting over the profitability of westward expansion, but the profitability of homogeneous territorial peoples and heterogeneous. Or stated differently “the profits from immigration as a vehicle for selling off a conquered conteintent, and the profits of selling them consumer goods, is now neutralized by the world having caught up to western technology and institutions. What the world cannot catch up to is western demographics and culture. Becuase as far as I know no other people are capable of it. The means of future competition are (a) eugneics (b) artificial intelligence (c) demographic distribution and population Now, technology ALWAYS EVENTUALLY AND QUCKLY EQUILIBRATES. GENES DO NOT. DO YOU UNDERSTAND? You cannot clean ‘polluted genes’. You can only separate good genes from bad Genes.

  • I mean, that’s the virtue of stoicism and aristotelianism over marxism/postmoder

    I mean, that’s the virtue of stoicism and aristotelianism over marxism/postmodernism/feminism. Stoics have no need or incentive to disapprove, shame, ridicule, gossip, rally and lie to protect a fallacious self image.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 00:49:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954516178696798208

    Reply addressees: @Aintezbncheez @hysellaz @TheView

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954513886656409600

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954513886656409600

  • And we can’t confuse the pseudoscience of psychology with the study of incentive

    And we can’t confuse the pseudoscience of psychology with the study of incentives, all of which are expressible as attempts at acquisition of some good, whether material, intellectual, or emotional. Right? I mean, because psychology evolved to encourage theft by guilt, right?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 00:34:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954512360420577280

    Reply addressees: @Aintezbncheez @hysellaz @TheView

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954504461858127874

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954504461858127874

  • Can Marx’s Labor Theory Of Value And Marginalist Economics Be Coherently Combined Without Any Essential Loss To Both Sides?

    No. Marxism is pseudoscience and contrary to incentives and demonstrated behavior – even contrary to evolutionary necessity – and marginalist economics is both logical and empirical and corresponds to incentives and demonstrated behavior – and it’s an expression of evolutionary necessity

    https://www.quora.com/Can-Marxs-labor-theory-of-value-and-marginalist-economics-be-coherently-combined-without-any-essential-loss-to-both-sides

  • If A White Person Prefers Hiring People From The Middle East Since He Has Better Experience With People From There, Is He Racist? What If His Preference Is For People From Sub-saharan Africa? Or People From Europe?

    If anyone makes any decision by any criteria other than their work history, that person is a racist, classist, cultureist, ageist, genderist.

    yet work historise are marginally indifferent, and prediction of past behavior is almost always false, and the single most important factor determiing success is cultural fit among the employees, and employees must generally be from the same class as the customers that they serve – or just below them.

    Ergo. It’s all just just anti-white pseudoscience – nonsense invented by the postmodernists to destroy western civilization and turn it into another underclass ghetto like the middle east, brazil, and india.

    https://www.quora.com/If-a-white-person-prefers-hiring-people-from-the-middle-east-since-he-has-better-experience-with-people-from-there-is-he-racist-What-if-his-preference-is-for-people-from-sub-saharan-Africa-Or-people-from-Europe

  • Can Marx’s Labor Theory Of Value And Marginalist Economics Be Coherently Combined Without Any Essential Loss To Both Sides?

    No. Marxism is pseudoscience and contrary to incentives and demonstrated behavior – even contrary to evolutionary necessity – and marginalist economics is both logical and empirical and corresponds to incentives and demonstrated behavior – and it’s an expression of evolutionary necessity

    https://www.quora.com/Can-Marxs-labor-theory-of-value-and-marginalist-economics-be-coherently-combined-without-any-essential-loss-to-both-sides