The problem with gold is (a) there is too little of it, (b) and as such it is too volitile for long term pricing. (c) and it is too open to manipulation. The problem with the fiat money system is only (a) we don’t have enough types of money, (b) we pay interest on borrowing from ourselves to create long term capital (housing, cars, appliances), which makes no damned sense at all, (c) we distribute liquidity through the financial sector and credit rather than just directly to consumers (citizens), and therefore cause the entire economy to reorganize and suffer the shocks, rather than simply having consumers correct the shock by shifting of consumption and debt. Libertarians are pretty much always wrong, because they’re always only half right, and they’re half right not because they’re moral, but because they want to enable private sector rents rather than public sector rents, instead of eliminating rents altogether. No man has any right to appreciation of a currency at the expense of others’ reduction of consumption or production. There is just no way to claim that. But it’s exactly the purpose of (((libertarian))) dogma: restoration of “the rents of the pale.”
Theme: Incentives
-
THE PROBLEM WITH THE GOLD STANDARD (LUDDISM) The problem with gold is (a) there
THE PROBLEM WITH THE GOLD STANDARD (LUDDISM)
The problem with gold is (a) there is too little of it, (b) and as such it is too volitile for long term pricing. (c) and it is too open to manipulation.
The problem with the fiat money system is only (a) we don’t have enough types of money, (b) we pay interest on borrowing from ourselves to create long term capital (housing, cars, appliances), which makes no damned sense at all, (c) we distribute liquidity through the financial sector and credit rather than just directly to consumers (citizens), and therefore cause the entire economy to reorganize and suffer the shocks, rather than simply having consumers correct the shock by shifting of consumption and debt.
Libertarians are pretty much always wrong, because they’re always only half right, and they’re half right not because they’re moral, but because they want to enable private sector rents rather than public sector rents, instead of eliminating rents altogether.
No man has any right to appreciation of a currency at the expense of others’ reduction of consumption or production. There is just no way to claim that. But it’s exactly the purpose of (((libertarian))) dogma: restoration of “the rents of the pale.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 10:25:00 UTC
-
RESTORING THE MARKET FOR PARENTAL ROLES Parenting (Training, Risk Taking) and Ca
RESTORING THE MARKET FOR PARENTAL ROLES
Parenting (Training, Risk Taking) and Care-taking (Maintenance, Risk Reduction) are very different things. As in all things the competition (market) between via-positiva and via-negativa produces optimums. Why? Anything else would require evolution not err, and frequently fail to adapt. We are not ants. We are special because of how rapidly we adapt. As such it is this market competition that creates a healthy human.
Ergo, we education to produce an optimum (failure point, fragility point) because of female influence in education, whereas producing competitions (stresses, adaptions, anti-fragility) produces humans because of male competition.
Women have destroyed civilization because they have undue influence in children, education (religion), and government. Pandora was a catastrophe.
We have to restore competition (differences) between the genders, not seek equality.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 10:12:00 UTC
-
THE LIES OF THE ENLIGHTENMENTS –“[we suffer from] ideological weakness”— Actu
THE LIES OF THE ENLIGHTENMENTS
–“[we suffer from] ideological weakness”—
Actually It’s classical liberal dishonesty combined with malincentives of global empire. There is no possibility of an aristocracy of everyone, nor are we in any way equal. That was just a ruse to sieze power from the landed aristocracy the same way the marxists/socialist/postmodernists have used similar arguments to undermine America – via women’s inclusion in the voting booth. The lie of the bourgeoise society – the theft of aristocratic civilization by classical liberal (middle class) ruse, the way it’s been stolen by the radical (underclass/academic) ruse by claiming oppression.
That lie is what begins it all. There is no such thing as bourgeoise civlization other than the tents of diasporic trade route travelers and pirates, hawking goods in bazaars without liability of warranty.
Aristocracy = Sovereignty. Aristocratic Egalitarians: those who will carry the burden of reciprocal insurance (sovereignty and reciprocity) may join the aristocracy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:21:00 UTC
-
DIMENSIONS OF JURIDICAL DECISION 1 – Reciprocity (relatively easy) 2 – Incentive
DIMENSIONS OF JURIDICAL DECISION
1 – Reciprocity (relatively easy)
2 – Incentive -means, motive, opportunity (relatively easy)
3 – Competency (this is the problem)
4 – Externality (relatively easy)
The problem with competency is that the superior is liable for the ignorance of the inferior, while the superior has every incentives to profit from the ignorance and incompetence of the inferior. Hence the question of ghetto vs aristocratic ethics: whether you do not (ghetto) or do (aristocratic) demand paternal due diligence. And the western answer is “yes”.
(draft)
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 15:15:00 UTC
-
ADAPTABILITY VS LOYALTY: ECONOMICS OF RELATIONS MALE……………………….
ADAPTABILITY VS LOYALTY: ECONOMICS OF RELATIONS
MALE…………………………..FEMALE
Greater Loyalty and ………Greater Adaptability and
Lower Adaptability ………..Lower Loyalty
Evolution varied the same theme.
We are compatible but we are neither identical nor equal.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 13:53:00 UTC
-
More Method To The Madness
—“When you intersperse, or do intermissions from the hard core Propertarian stuff and add tips/topics on life, love, money, programming/tech and business especially, it psychologically shows others (not our guys, but the general public), “Shit, this guy is not a failed austrian immigrant painter living in a flophouse”, but very well studied and successful. It also teaches Propertarian utility in real life and it makes it fun. Lastly it makes it harder for enemies to attack because if they say, he doesn’t know about business, they open up and pull that out and get crushed and that association makes what you say stronger on Propertarianism.”— A Friend
[T]here is method to the madness…. I also play king of the hill and bait constantly to make it a game. I also post things that I disagree with, or that can be interpreted other ways, to start debate. Congratulate even the smallest success. Edit and quote others to inspire them to keep trying. Audit the feed and comments.Ask others to contribute or handle those i can’t. Run experiments so others can help me and themselves. Keep a loose inventory and estimate of people who are talented and drip ideas to them as needed while letting them own the discoveries they make. And i also try to include thinking women without demanding they think or play the game as males. And Include people from as many cultures as I can so that we all transcend the century of pseudoscience and sophism. 😉 Thanks for appreciating it. 😉
-
More Method To The Madness
—“When you intersperse, or do intermissions from the hard core Propertarian stuff and add tips/topics on life, love, money, programming/tech and business especially, it psychologically shows others (not our guys, but the general public), “Shit, this guy is not a failed austrian immigrant painter living in a flophouse”, but very well studied and successful. It also teaches Propertarian utility in real life and it makes it fun. Lastly it makes it harder for enemies to attack because if they say, he doesn’t know about business, they open up and pull that out and get crushed and that association makes what you say stronger on Propertarianism.”— A Friend
[T]here is method to the madness…. I also play king of the hill and bait constantly to make it a game. I also post things that I disagree with, or that can be interpreted other ways, to start debate. Congratulate even the smallest success. Edit and quote others to inspire them to keep trying. Audit the feed and comments.Ask others to contribute or handle those i can’t. Run experiments so others can help me and themselves. Keep a loose inventory and estimate of people who are talented and drip ideas to them as needed while letting them own the discoveries they make. And i also try to include thinking women without demanding they think or play the game as males. And Include people from as many cultures as I can so that we all transcend the century of pseudoscience and sophism. 😉 Thanks for appreciating it. 😉
-
Markets Serve the Demands of Complexity
by Jim Leis So as a very simple example, complexity structurally demands trial. And also innately breaks up large populations in preference for smaller ones; large ant hills and wolf packs split at certain sizes. Actually, complexity demands it. So, on a very base level, globalism is too hierarchical and statist for complexity. Globalism, socialism, communism, will never work because it drives complexity out of a society. Which will kill it. Put another way, a king’s power is in upholding the rule of law. If he amasses too much power, regulating business, property, etc., he relegates his fellow citizens to robots and kills complexity, and then kills society.
-
Markets Serve the Demands of Complexity
by Jim Leis So as a very simple example, complexity structurally demands trial. And also innately breaks up large populations in preference for smaller ones; large ant hills and wolf packs split at certain sizes. Actually, complexity demands it. So, on a very base level, globalism is too hierarchical and statist for complexity. Globalism, socialism, communism, will never work because it drives complexity out of a society. Which will kill it. Put another way, a king’s power is in upholding the rule of law. If he amasses too much power, regulating business, property, etc., he relegates his fellow citizens to robots and kills complexity, and then kills society.