Curt Doolittle

Theme: Incentives

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“A friendly reminder it’s no longer in you

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“A friendly reminder it’s no longer in young men’s interest to preserve the social order”—Brendan Hegarty

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-24 03:10:52 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE MALE DISINCENTIVE FOR SOCIAL PRESERVATION

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE MALE DISINCENTIVE FOR SOCIAL PRESERVATION
    by Lance Bean

    “It’s ALL Different Now.”

    Relationship dynamics have completely changed. But without a MARKETING CAMPAIGN, repeatedly smashing it into people’s men’s faces, NOBODY is “getting it”. And as a consequence we see a anxious, spooked, flocking of everyone’s frames creating a chaos of confusion as we seek a restoration, when the problem is that we can’t.

    “IT’S ALL DIFFERENT NOW”: Men and women NEED each other less with every passing moment. That fact changes the family dynamic. Technology has freed us from interdependence.

    Marriage WAS the alternative to prostitution. Now prostitution is criminal and marriage is passé. It used to be both genders marry young and have several kids to work the farm. Families were an asset that provided lifetime discounts and insurance, allowed for the accumulation of capital, prevented parasitism on the property and efforts of others, and prevented male on male violence.

    Now, it’s extremely smart for the youngest women to have a single child by several different men of high income with established careers – preferably in marriages.

    Her incentives are to increase her income by being a baby maker but siphoning off of men – who lose marketability to other women, lose the ability to accumulate resources, and are doomed to poverty in old age.

    Under those conditions, men have become indentured slaves until the child is a mid 20’s adult – and wards of the state in old age. Children in the past were considered adults at 14 or 15 and they had to work and some married. Today they infantilized by a female dominated educational system, the aggressive suppression of masculinity and male dominance play that is necessary for men to invest in family, society, and polity.

    To pretend that the natural order is a traditional conservative nuclear family is ridiculous: the natural order is prostitution.

    Prostitution was accepted as legitimate for thousands of years. ALL women were prostitutes.

    Men only “married” or sometimes took care of the women that had a kid by him through rape most likely.

    The men could organize, hunt, kill and rape.

    Now they are tax slaves.

    What does this mean? It is no longer in men’s incentive to preserve a government and social order that reduces them to serfdom, isolation, old age loneliness, and poverty.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 23:19:03 UTC

  • “A friendly reminder it’s no longer in young men’s interest to preserve the soci

    —“A friendly reminder it’s no longer in young men’s interest to preserve the social order”—Brendan Hegarty

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 23:10:00 UTC

  • Centralization

    Centralization is achieved by suppression of local parasitism and rents, and levying taxation instead, that is used for that suppression. This drastically reduces transaction costs and associated risks, which in turn produces volume and velocity. The problem of taxation arises when it is not used for the purpose of suppressing local parasitism and rents and instead simply centralizes parasitism and rents.

  • The Male Disincentive for Social Preservation

    by Lance Bean “It’s ALL Different Now.” Relationship dynamics have completely changed. But without a MARKETING CAMPAIGN, repeatedly smashing it into people’s men’s faces, NOBODY is “getting it”. And as a consequence we see a anxious, spooked, flocking of everyone’s frames creating a chaos of confusion as we seek a restoration, when the problem is that we can’t. “IT’S ALL DIFFERENT NOW”: Men and women NEED each other less with every passing moment. That fact changes the family dynamic. Technology has freed us from interdependence. Marriage WAS the alternative to prostitution. Now prostitution is criminal and marriage is passé. It used to be both genders marry young and have several kids to work the farm. Families were an asset that provided lifetime discounts and insurance, allowed for the accumulation of capital, prevented parasitism on the property and efforts of others, and prevented male on male violence. Now, it’s extremely smart for the youngest women to have a single child by several different men of high income with established careers – preferably in marriages. Her incentives are to increase her income by being a baby maker but siphoning off of men – who lose marketability to other women, lose the ability to accumulate resources, and are doomed to poverty in old age. Under those conditions, men have become indentured slaves until the child is a mid 20’s adult – and wards of the state in old age. Children in the past were considered adults at 14 or 15 and they had to work and some married. Today they infantilized by a female dominated educational system, the aggressive suppression of masculinity and male dominance play that is necessary for men to invest in family, society, and polity. To pretend that the natural order is a traditional conservative nuclear family is ridiculous: the natural order is prostitution. Prostitution was accepted as legitimate for thousands of years. ALL women were prostitutes. Men only “married” or sometimes took care of the women that had a kid by him through rape most likely. The men could organize, hunt, kill and rape. Now they are tax slaves. What does this mean? It is no longer in men’s incentive to preserve a government and social order that reduces them to serfdom, isolation, old age loneliness, and poverty.

  • The Male Disincentive for Social Preservation

    by Lance Bean “It’s ALL Different Now.” Relationship dynamics have completely changed. But without a MARKETING CAMPAIGN, repeatedly smashing it into people’s men’s faces, NOBODY is “getting it”. And as a consequence we see a anxious, spooked, flocking of everyone’s frames creating a chaos of confusion as we seek a restoration, when the problem is that we can’t. “IT’S ALL DIFFERENT NOW”: Men and women NEED each other less with every passing moment. That fact changes the family dynamic. Technology has freed us from interdependence. Marriage WAS the alternative to prostitution. Now prostitution is criminal and marriage is passé. It used to be both genders marry young and have several kids to work the farm. Families were an asset that provided lifetime discounts and insurance, allowed for the accumulation of capital, prevented parasitism on the property and efforts of others, and prevented male on male violence. Now, it’s extremely smart for the youngest women to have a single child by several different men of high income with established careers – preferably in marriages. Her incentives are to increase her income by being a baby maker but siphoning off of men – who lose marketability to other women, lose the ability to accumulate resources, and are doomed to poverty in old age. Under those conditions, men have become indentured slaves until the child is a mid 20’s adult – and wards of the state in old age. Children in the past were considered adults at 14 or 15 and they had to work and some married. Today they infantilized by a female dominated educational system, the aggressive suppression of masculinity and male dominance play that is necessary for men to invest in family, society, and polity. To pretend that the natural order is a traditional conservative nuclear family is ridiculous: the natural order is prostitution. Prostitution was accepted as legitimate for thousands of years. ALL women were prostitutes. Men only “married” or sometimes took care of the women that had a kid by him through rape most likely. The men could organize, hunt, kill and rape. Now they are tax slaves. What does this mean? It is no longer in men’s incentive to preserve a government and social order that reduces them to serfdom, isolation, old age loneliness, and poverty.

  • THE MALE DISINCENTIVE FOR SOCIAL PRESERVATION by Lance Bean “It’s ALL Different

    THE MALE DISINCENTIVE FOR SOCIAL PRESERVATION

    by Lance Bean

    “It’s ALL Different Now.”

    Relationship dynamics have completely changed. But without a MARKETING CAMPAIGN, repeatedly smashing it into people’s men’s faces, NOBODY is “getting it”. And as a consequence we see a anxious, spooked, flocking of everyone’s frames creating a chaos of confusion as we seek a restoration, when the problem is that we can’t.

    “IT’S ALL DIFFERENT NOW”: Men and women NEED each other less with every passing moment. That fact changes the family dynamic. Technology has freed us from interdependence.

    Marriage WAS the alternative to prostitution. Now prostitution is criminal and marriage is passé. It used to be both genders marry young and have several kids to work the farm. Families were an asset that provided lifetime discounts and insurance, allowed for the accumulation of capital, prevented parasitism on the property and efforts of others, and prevented male on male violence.

    Now, it’s extremely smart for the youngest women to have a single child by several different men of high income with established careers – preferably in marriages.

    Her incentives are to increase her income by being a baby maker but siphoning off of men – who lose marketability to other women, lose the ability to accumulate resources, and are doomed to poverty in old age.

    Under those conditions, men have become indentured slaves until the child is a mid 20’s adult – and wards of the state in old age. Children in the past were considered adults at 14 or 15 and they had to work and some married. Today they infantilized by a female dominated educational system, the aggressive suppression of masculinity and male dominance play that is necessary for men to invest in family, society, and polity.

    To pretend that the natural order is a traditional conservative nuclear family is ridiculous: the natural order is prostitution.

    Prostitution was accepted as legitimate for thousands of years. ALL women were prostitutes.

    Men only “married” or sometimes took care of the women that had a kid by him through rape most likely.

    The men could organize, hunt, kill and rape.

    Now they are tax slaves.

    What does this mean? It is no longer in men’s incentive to preserve a government and social order that reduces them to serfdom, isolation, old age loneliness, and poverty.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 19:19:00 UTC

  • The Incentive for Marriage Restored.

    |COURTS:| Criminal > Civil > Familial > Comercial > Civic > National. The family is the smallest corporation with the least assets, and the problem with family court is not a separate court for adjudication of differences in those corporations we call the family, but the notion of common property and the proposition that and interdependency can survive ending of that corporation. Ergo, no alimony, child support, and children to the mother and young adults from 12 to the father – pending the discretion of the child. Lets remember that men with children remarry, while women with children tend to circumvent marriage because they can use children for spousal substitution, and cannot bear compromise or competition in a new household where she must adapt her intuitions. When the corporation ends, it ends. And each party negotiates a new inter-gender organization. Or not. Hence the incentive for marriage is restored.

  • The Incentive for Marriage Restored.

    |COURTS:| Criminal > Civil > Familial > Comercial > Civic > National. The family is the smallest corporation with the least assets, and the problem with family court is not a separate court for adjudication of differences in those corporations we call the family, but the notion of common property and the proposition that and interdependency can survive ending of that corporation. Ergo, no alimony, child support, and children to the mother and young adults from 12 to the father – pending the discretion of the child. Lets remember that men with children remarry, while women with children tend to circumvent marriage because they can use children for spousal substitution, and cannot bear compromise or competition in a new household where she must adapt her intuitions. When the corporation ends, it ends. And each party negotiates a new inter-gender organization. Or not. Hence the incentive for marriage is restored.

  • women fear to alter the status quo when it creates risk, men do not since it cre

    women fear to alter the status quo when it creates risk, men do not since it creates opportunity. This is why women perpetuate virtue signals like they do fashion signals or hen-pecking in female groups. It never ends. There is no optimum condition.

    Women voted to alter the status quo as a virtue, fashion, pecking cycle. It’s endless (Suicidal, obsessive, precognitive).

    Children and men are costly, so if they can marry the state and invite underclass opponents, and end marriage demands, they will do so (and have demonstrated it everywhere).

    SO they have and do alter the status quo, they wll not vote and do not act or vote to produce scarcity even when scarcity of opportunity is the optimum intertemporal investment.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 15:03:00 UTC