Theme: Incentives

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. YOU ARE OWNED BY THOSE WHO CREATE ACESS TO MA

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    YOU ARE OWNED BY THOSE WHO CREATE ACESS TO MARKETS

    Toyota Motor Company owns: Lexus, Scion, Daihatsu and Hino Motors, with a stake in Fuji Industries (Subaru’s parent company) and Isuzu.

    …. Subaru: Owned by Fuji Heavy Industries with Toyota a minority partner.

    …. Tesla: Toyota is a minority partner. Partnership with Daimler AG.

    Volkswagen owns: Audi, Bentley, Bugatti, Lamborghini, Porsche, and overseas-brands SEAT and Skoda.

    Fiat owns: Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Dodge, Ferrari, Jeep, Lancia, Maserati, Ram and SRT.

    BMW owns: Mini, Rolls Royce, and British Layland.

    Daimler AG owns: Mercedes-Benz and Smart.

    Renault owns: Mitsubishi, Dacia. Nissan. Nissan owns Infiniti.

    Peugeot owns: Citroën, DS, Opel and Vauxhall brands:

    General Motors owns: Cadillac, Buick, Chevrolet, and GMC.
    *GM owns a controlling interest in Opel and Vauxhall in Europe and Holden in Australia.

    Ford owns: Ford, Lincoln and a small stake in Mazda.

    Mitsubishi is independently owned

    Hyundai owns: Kia.

    Tata(india) Owns Jaguar, Land Rover, Chery (china).

    Volvo is owned by Chinese-automaker Zhejiang Geely
    Saab is owned by National Electric Vehicle Sweden (NEVS).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-03 16:15:52 UTC

  • FULL ACCOUNTING Tax by Income Minus Risk Minus Cellular Damage. Watch what happe

    FULL ACCOUNTING

    Tax by Income Minus Risk Minus Cellular Damage. Watch what happens to tax tolerance when the people with easy jobs of low risk and low cellular damage are taxed higher than people with risk, and those with cellular damage and risk the least.

    All pretense of ‘equality’ is simply a method for defrauding those who pay higher costs by indirection than those who do directly.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-03 15:39:00 UTC

  • YOU ARE OWNED BY THOSE WHO CREATE ACESS TO MARKETS Toyota Motor Company owns: Le

    YOU ARE OWNED BY THOSE WHO CREATE ACESS TO MARKETS

    Toyota Motor Company owns: Lexus, Scion, Daihatsu and Hino Motors, with a stake in Fuji Industries (Subaru’s parent company) and Isuzu.

    …. Subaru: Owned by Fuji Heavy Industries with Toyota a minority partner.

    …. Tesla: Toyota is a minority partner. Partnership with Daimler AG.

    Volkswagen owns: Audi, Bentley, Bugatti, Lamborghini, Porsche, and overseas-brands SEAT and Skoda.

    Fiat owns: Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Dodge, Ferrari, Jeep, Lancia, Maserati, Ram and SRT.

    BMW owns: Mini, Rolls Royce, and British Layland.

    Daimler AG owns: Mercedes-Benz and Smart.

    Renault owns: Mitsubishi, Dacia. Nissan. Nissan owns Infiniti.

    Peugeot owns: Citroën, DS, Opel and Vauxhall brands:

    General Motors owns: Cadillac, Buick, Chevrolet, and GMC.

    *GM owns a controlling interest in Opel and Vauxhall in Europe and Holden in Australia.

    Ford owns: Ford, Lincoln and a small stake in Mazda.

    Mitsubishi is independently owned

    Hyundai owns: Kia.

    Tata(india) Owns Jaguar, Land Rover, Chery (china).

    Volvo is owned by Chinese-automaker Zhejiang Geely

    Saab is owned by National Electric Vehicle Sweden (NEVS).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-03 12:15:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link. When I gave a talk on the future of advertising an

    Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    When I gave a talk on the future of advertising and marketing in 09 people told me I was nuts.

    Yet here we are: “MARKET TO CULTS”. Lots of small campaigns that reach each cult.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 23:02:10 UTC

  • I gave a talk on the future of advertising and marketing in 09 people told me I

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/forget-photo-shoots-why-gq-and-gucci-are-betting-on-cutly-podcasts-1532966510https://www.wsj.com/articles/forget-photo-shoots-why-gq-and-gucci-are-betting-on-cutly-podcasts-1532966510When I gave a talk on the future of advertising and marketing in 09 people told me I was nuts.

    Yet here we are: “MARKET TO CULTS”. Lots of small campaigns that reach each cult.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 19:02:00 UTC

  • I gave a talk on the future of advertising and marketing in 09 people told me I

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/forget-photo-shoots-why-gq-and-gucci-are-betting-on-cutly-podcasts-1532966510When I gave a talk on the future of advertising and marketing in 09 people told me I was nuts.

    Yet here we are: “MARKET TO CULTS”. Lots of small campaigns that reach each cult.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 19:02:00 UTC

  • “Love is just alimony waiting to happen.”– anon Ouch. Love is insufficient for

    –“Love is just alimony waiting to happen.”– anon

    Ouch. Love is insufficient for the prevention of child support and alimony. A compatible and preferable division of labor is necessary.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 11:01:00 UTC

  • 5) the alt right is possible because the internet allows people who are naturall

    5) the alt right is possible because the internet allows people who are naturally apolitical to mirror the propaganda strategy of the marxists who are highly political. So the economics of collaboration have been reversed from favoring the left to the right.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 21:24:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1024043098895249408

    Reply addressees: @Aremazu19

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1024025534467121153


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1024025534467121153

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THOUGHTS ON THE GERMAN POSTWAR THEORY: ORDOLI

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THOUGHTS ON THE GERMAN POSTWAR THEORY: ORDOLIBERALISM

    —“Is ordoliberalism an effective economic theory in your opinion? Why/why not?”—
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordoliberalism

    THE CORRECT ANSWER

    Ordoliberalism refers to the state-private alliance used by Germans after world war two. The premise is for the state to extend the market such that it provides desired goods and services rather than to take over the market for the production of goods and services.

    Ordoliberalism (geramn) differs from classical liberalism (anglo) just as continental law (german/french) differs from common law (anglo), in that the anglo seeks to suppress the state’s interference in the market (optimistic), and the german seeks to guard and manage the market (pragmatic to pessimistic).

    The anglo model is Imperial and expansionist (seizing all growth opportunities), and the german is domestic (maximizing known wants).

    The principle issue here is (a) demographic and (b) cultural. You can only conduct the german model with a martial (professional) bureaucracy and very honest people (farming). You can only conduct the anglo model when innovation is accessible (sail, piracy, conquest).

    So again, there is no ‘best’ model of government, there are only organizations that satisfy wants, needs, and exploit opportunities.

    The german postwar model was somewhat like the Chinese postwar model, and that is when you are ‘behind’ and want to ‘catch up’ it is a problem of organization. When you are ‘ahead’ and want to ‘stay ahead’ it’s a problem of innovation. The german model would be ‘bad’ for imperial purposes, and ‘good’ for postwar purposes.

    Germans are unique because of superior and homogeneous genetics, superior political culture due to lack of a central state, superior culture due to mastering craftsmanship for production of quality products, and the professionalization of the bureaucracy in imitation of Frederick the Great – and the subsequent investment in technical education that allowed Germany to produce the scientific (rather than British empirical) revolution – from which the postwar era has so soundly benefitted. In other words, the Germans and the Japanese both pursued superior export goods as a postwar strategy – and they COULD because of genetic(demographic) and cultural superiority. This is not a strategy all peoples can pursue – they lack the genetics, culture, and institutions to do so.

    As I’ve said repeatedly, and will continue to, the primary economic advantage any culture can seek is demographic. This will exacerbate over the next century such that smaller states with superior demographics will constantly outperform larger states with worse demographics. The people you live with have greater influence on your potential than do your abilities.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 15:10:58 UTC

  • (worth repeating) —As I’ve said repeatedly, and will continue to, the primary

    (worth repeating)

    —As I’ve said repeatedly, and will continue to, the primary economic advantage any culture can seek is demographic. This will exacerbate over the next century such that smaller states with superior demographics will constantly outperform larger states with worse demographics. The people you live with have greater influence on your potential than do your abilities.—


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 12:09:00 UTC