RT @DegenRolf: Delayed reward discounting, the preference for smaller, more immediate rewards as opposed to larger, yet delayed rewards. sh…
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-21 00:56:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108532884212723712
There is no possible better solution. If we had done this when I first recommended it in 2009, all those TRILLIONS would be in the hands of americans not BANKERS. yang is making the problem WORSE. It will ALL go to financial, landlord, credit cards. all of it will inflate away.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-20 20:33:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108466570685308928
Reply addressees: @SupremeGentNRx
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108464438502400000
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108464438502400000
This would gut the government,gut the financial sector; gut immigration, redistribute TRILLIONS a year, and mean the average homeowner would require one working parent, pay off mortgages in 15 years, crash the price of houses and rents.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-20 20:31:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108466111039893504
Reply addressees: @SupremeGentNRx
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108464438502400000
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108464438502400000
yes I have. “nationalize mc; issue one to every citizen over 18; distribute liquidity (regulate interest rates) directly to the people rather than thru the financial sector; distribute 20% of tax revenues to the same means; eliminate consumer interest, by direct loan from treas.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-20 20:27:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108465117539303425
Reply addressees: @SupremeGentNRx
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108464438502400000
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108464438502400000
Correct. Although they are more independent than any others because of their heavy investment in nuclear energy. 56 percent of France’s installed generating capacity– 63 GW out of 112 GW — is nuclear-based. 78 percent of the electricity generated in France is by nuclear power.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-20 15:44:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108393791734628352
Reply addressees: @MaMo_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108381868175564800
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108381868175564800
HOW IT’S DONE WITH ELEGANCE
by Ferdinand Pizarro
The satisfaction of preferences tend toward equilibrium in that the utility produced by the marginal satisfaction of preferences is never exceeded by the marginal cost of satisfying the preference.
Markets for goods & services function to ensure equilibrium in private-consumption of consumer-goods & by extension allocative efficiency in capital markets through the production of price signals–via positva satisfaction of preference; whereas the market for rule & commons ensures equilibrium by incrementally suppressing the satisfaction of preference at the expense of peers & commons–via negativa elimination of externality.
Ergo, the law performs as a signaling function for the cost of preference to society (commons), allowing for the optimal satisfaction of preference under the constraint of strict-reciprocity.
— CURTD —
Curt Doolittle just going to walk thru this carefully because you usually have something very smart to say….
—“The satisfaction of preferences tend toward equilibrium in that the utility produced by the marginal satisfaction of preferences is never exceeded by the marginal cost of satisfying the preference.”—
Perfect.
—Markets for goods & services function to ensure equilibrium in private-consumption of consumer-goods & by extension allocative efficiency in capital markets through the production of price signals–via positva satisfaction of preference; whereas the market for rule & commons ensures equilibrium by incrementally suppressing the satisfaction of preference at the expense of peers & commons–via negativa elimination of externality. “—
That’s perfect. I use “goods, services, and information” now rather than just “goods and services”.
—“Ergo, the law performs as a signaling function for the cost of preference to society (commons), allowing for the optimal satisfaction of preference under the constraint of strict-reciprocity.”—
Perfect.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 17:25:00 UTC
ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF NEW EUROPEAN ZONE
—“Curt, Can you please write a post on the economic feasibility of banning imports outside of a New European zone? I want to see what the king of the hill process does to the proposal on page 67 of NZM”— Oliver
New European Zone? I assume that means Australia, NZ, USA, Canada, Europe, Eastern Europe, Russia, (But South America?, India?).
(Short version: easy for everyone except aussie/nz who pay the distance cost. But its easy to do, yes.)
I’m not going to go into world balances of trade between the parties. It would take me all day to write this post. And I’m going to state the obvious that other countries would retaliate. But if you look at the list at the end of this post you will rapidly see that the USA and canada can easily survive it. The outliers are NZ and Aussies who are for all intents and purposes, client states of asia.
Cutting out africa (minerals), the middle east(oil), and asia(manufacturing capacity) is entirely possible. and the result would largely be transfer of japanese and chinese manufacturing capacity to Germany and the USA, and the strategic transfer of the Japanese relationship to Asia, and an axis of japan and south korea that might perhaps ally with india.
It is hard to choose whether to exclude or include india and south america, both of which are european admixtures. Russia is also integrated with (northern) Kazakhstan and imports 1/10th of its oil. Russia India and China have large trade relationships. The west would have to subsidize russian military production by buying their equipment as a replacement for the asian and middle eastern markets. China wold be able to build her military technology by finding ready markets middle eastern, african, and asian realms.
Russia would roughly exchange its role as an asian trade power for the role of the middle east and asia in supplying oil and resources. And so it is russia that is the ‘power position’ in any such negotiation, and putting her in this position of power would tempt russian nature, but restore her to world power status which she desires.
However russia cannot compete as a world power with her population and economy; asia as an interest in reclaiming russian territory and resources. Her interest given her nature might be swiss neutrality. We would have to buy russian involvement which would require american military exit from europe and a general comfort on the part of eastern europeans that is hard to imagine.
THE ALTERNATIVE 1
Limit trade to raw materials and food, and autarky on goods produced by transformation of them. This is the optimum balance of providing world trade in territorial differences but ameliorating differences in degrees of development of human capital by eliminating wage arbitrage (differences in cost of living and purchasing power).
THE ALTERNATIVE 2
The Anglosphere Alternative (restoration of the british empire). is somewhat easier to pull off since we are already autarkic with only Australian and NZ the outliers.
Australia:
***China 32.2%,
***Japan 15.9%,
***South Korea 7.1%,
US 5.4%,
***India 4.2% (2015)
New Zealand:
***China: US$9.6 billion (24.9% of New Zealand’s total exports)
Australia: $5.7 billion (14.8%)
United States: $3.7 billion (9.6%)
***Japan: $2.4 billion (6.3%)
***South Korea: $1.2 billion (3.1%)
United Kingdom: $1 billion (2.7%)
***Singapore: $832.5 million (2.2%)
***Taiwan: $831.8 million (2.2%)
***Hong Kong: $761.5 million (2%)
***Malaysia: $702.5 million (1.8%)
***Indonesia: $675.8 million (1.8%)
***Thailand: $638.2 million (1.7%)
Netherlands: $586 million (1.5%)
Germany: $579 million (1.5%)
***United Arab Emirates: $533.8 million (1.4%)
Canada:
United States: US$337.8 billion (75.1% of total Canadian exports)
***China: $21.3 billion (4.7%)
United Kingdom: $12.6 billion (2.8%)
***Japan: $10 billion (2.2%)
Mexico: $6.3 billion (1.4%)
South Korea: $4.5 billion (1%)
Germany: $3.7 billion (0.8%)
Netherlands: $3.7 billion (0.8%)
***India: $3.2 billion (0.7%)
***Hong Kong: $3 billion (0.7%)
Belgium: $2.8 billion (0.6%)
France: $2.6 billion (0.6%)
Italy: $2.3 billion (0.5%)
Norway: $1.9 billion (0.4%)
***Brazil: $1.7 billion (0.4%)
America:
Canada: US$298.7 billion (18% of total US exports)
***Mexico: $265 billion (15.9%)
***China: $120.3 billion (7.2%)
***Japan: $75 billion (4.5%)
United Kingdom: $66.2 billion (4%)
Germany: $57.7 billion (3.5%)
***South Korea: $56.3 billion (3.4%)
Netherlands: $49.4 billion (3%)
***Brazil: $39.5 billion (2.4%)
Hong Kong: $37.5 billion (2.3%)
France: $37.4 billion (2.2%)
***Singapore: $33.1 billion (2%)
***India: $33.1 billion (2%)
Belgium: $31.4 billion (1.9%)
***Taiwan: $30.2 billion (1.8%)
UK:
United States: US$64.4 billion (13.3% of total UK exports)
Germany: $47 billion (9.7%)
Netherlands: $33.3 billion (6.9%)
France: $31.8 billion (6.6%)
Ireland: $28.3 billion (5.9%)
***China: $27.5 billion (5.7%)
Switzerland: $25.4 billion (5.2%)
Belgium: $19.1 billion (4%)
Italy: $14.1 billion (2.9%)
Spain: $13.9 billion (2.9%)
***Hong Kong: $10.3 billion (2.1%)
***United Arab Emirates: $10 billion (2.1%)
***Turkey: $9.5 billion (2%)
***Japan: $8.3 billion (1.7%)
***South Korea: $7.8 billion (1.6%)
Ireland:
United States: US$46 billion (27.9% of total Irish exports)
Belgium: $21.7 billion (13.2%)
United Kingdom: $18.7 billion (11.4%)
Germany: $12.2 billion (7.4%)
Netherlands: $9 billion (5.4%)
Switzerland: $7.7 billion (4.6%)
France: $6.2 billion (3.8%)
China: $5.4 billion (3.3%)
Japan: $4.6 billion (2.8%)
Italy: $4.3 billion (2.6%)
Spain: $3 billion (1.8%)
***Mexico: $1.7 billion (1%)
Canada: $1.6 billion (1%)
Poland: $1.4 billion (0.8%)
Sweden: $1.1 billion (0.7%)
LATIN BLOCK
France: (FRANCE IS, LIKE THE USA, AUTARKIC)
Germany: US$83.3 billion (14.7% of total French exports)
United States: $45.3 billion (8%)
Spain: $44.3 billion (7.8%)
Italy: $42.8 billion (7.5%)
Belgium: $40.4 billion (7.1%)
United Kingdom: $38.6 billion (6.8%)
***China: $24.5 billion (4.3%)
Netherlands: $20.9 billion (3.7%)
Switzerland: $18.9 billion (3.3%)
Poland: $11.7 billion (2.1%)
***Singapore: $9.7 billion (1.7%)
***Japan: $7.8 billion (1.4%)
***Hong Kong: $7.3 billion (1.3%)
***Turkey: $7.1 billion (1.2%)
***India: $6.5 billion (1.1%)
Spain
France: US$48.5 billion (15.1% of total Spanish exports)
Germany: $36.1 billion (11.3%)
Italy: $25.1 billion (7.8%)
Portugal: $22.6 billion (7.1%)
United Kingdom: $22 billion (6.9%)
United States: $14.1 billion (4.4%)
Netherlands: $10.8 billion (3.4%)
Belgium: $9.6 billion (3%)
Morocco: $9 billion (2.8%)
***China: $7.1 billion (2.2%)
Poland: $6.5 billion (2%)
Turkey: $6.5 billion (2%)
Mexico: $5.2 billion (1.6%)
Switzerland: $4.7 billion (1.5%)
Romania: $3.2 billion (1%)
Portugal
Spain: US$17.4 billion (25.3% of total Portuguese exports)
France: $8.7 billion (12.7%)
Germany: $7.9 billion (11.5%)
United Kingdom: $4.3 billion (6.3%)
United States: $3.4 billion (5%)
Italy: $2.9 billion (4.3%)
Netherlands: $2.6 billion (3.8%)
Angola: $1.8 billion (2.6%)
Belgium: $1.6 billion (2.3%)
Brazil: $957.5 million (1.4%)
Poland: $897.2 million (1.3%)
***Morocco: $819.4 million (1.2%)
China: $777.6 million (1.1%)
Sweden: $686.8 million (1%)
Switzerland: $681.6 million (1%)
ITALY:
Germany: US$62.9 billion (12.4% of total Italian exports)
France: $51.9 billion (10.3%)
United States: $45.8 billion (9%)
Spain: $26.1 billion (5.2%)
United Kingdom: $26 billion (5.1%)
Switzerland: $23.4 billion (4.6%)
***China: $15.3 billion (3%)
Belgium: $15.2 billion (3%)
Poland: $14.2 billion (2.8%)
Netherlands: $11.8 billion (2.3%)
***Turkey: $11.4 billion (2.3%)
Austria: $10.7 billion (2.1%)
Russia: $9 billion (1.8%)
Romania: $8.2 billion (1.6%)
***Japan: $7.4 billion (1.5%)
GERMAN BLOCK
Netherlands
Germany: US$146.8 billion (22.5% of total Dutch exports)
Belgium: $68.3 billion (10.5%)
United Kingdom: $56.6 billion (8.7%)
France: $55.3 billion (8.5%)
Italy: $25.7 billion (3.9%)
United States: $22.7 billion (3.5%)
Spain: $19.9 billion (3.1%)
Poland: $15.6 billion (2.4%)
Sweden: $14.7 billion (2.2%)
***China: $13.5 billion (2.1%)
Czech Republic: $11.2 billion (1.7%)
Austria: $8.6 billion (1.3%)
Switzerland: $7.9 billion (1.2%)
Denmark: $7.8 billion (1.2%)
***Turkey: $7.2 billion (1.1%)
Belglum
Germany: US$70.7 billion (16.5% of total Belgian exports)
France: $63.8 billion (14.9%)
Netherlands: $51.4 billion (12%)
United Kingdom: $36 billion (8.4%)
Italy: $20.9 billion (4.9%)
United States: $20.6 billion (4.8%)
Spain: $11.8 billion (2.8%)
Poland: $9.2 billion (2.1%)
***India: $8.9 billion (2.1%)
***China: $8.9 billion (2.1%)
Sweden: $7.5 billion (1.7%)
Switzerland: $7 billion (1.6%)
Luxembourg: $6.4 billion (1.5%)
***Turkey: $5.8 billion (1.4%)
Russia: $4.4 billion (1%)
Over three-quarters (77.1%) of Belgian exports in 2017 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.
Germany:
United States: US$134 billion (8.6% of total German exports)
France: $124.4 billion (8%)
***China: $109.9 billion (7.1%)
Netherlands: $99.8 billion (6.4%)
United Kingdom: $96.8 billion (6.2%)
Italy: $82.6 billion (5.3%)
Austria: $75.2 billion (4.8%)
Poland: $74.7 billion (4.8%)
Switzerland: $64.3 billion (4.1%)
Spain: $52.4 billion (3.4%)
Belgium: $52.3 billion (3.4%)
Czech Republic: $51.8 billion (3.3%)
Sweden: $31.1 billion (2%)
Hungary: $31 billion (2%)
Russia: $30.6 billion (2%)
Austria
Germany: US$48.7 billion (29.0% of total Austrian exports)
United States: $10.3 billion (6.1%)
Italy: $10.2 billion (6.1%)
Switzerland: $8.5 billion (5.1%)
Slovakia: $8.1 billion (4.8%)
France: $7.9 billion (4.7%)
Czech Republic: $5.9 billion (3.5%)
Hungary: $5.5 billion (3.3%)
Poland: $5.2 billion (3.1%)
***China: $4.4 billion (2.6%)
United Kingdom: $4.4 billion (2.6%)
Slovenia: $3.2 billion (1.9%)
Netherlands: $2.9 billion (1.7%)
Romania: $2.7 billion (1.6%)
Spain: $2.7 billion (1.6%)
Over three-quarters (77.6%) of Austrian exports in 2017 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.
Denmark:
Germany: US$15.6 billion (14.5% of total Danish exports)
Sweden: $11.3 billion (10.5%)
United Kingdom: $6.7 billion (6.2%)
Norway: $6.3 billion (5.9%)
United States: $4.7 billion (4.4%)
Netherlands: $4.6 billion (4.3%)
France: $3.3 billion (3.1%)
***China: $3.2 billion (2.9%)
Poland: $3 billion (2.8%)
Italy: $2.4 billion (2.2%)
Finland: $2 billion (1.9%)
Spain: $1.9 billion (1.8%)
Belgium: $1.7 billion (1.6%)
***Japan: $1.5 billion (1.4%)
Australia: $959.3 million (0.9%)
Sweden
Germany: US$16.4 billion (10.7% of total Swedish exports)
Norway: $15.5 billion (10.1%)
Finland: $10.5 billion (6.9%)
Denmark: $10.4 billion (6.8%)
United States: $10.1 billion (6.6%)
United Kingdom: $9.3 billion (6.1%)
Netherlands: $8.3 billion (5.4%)
***China: $6.8 billion (4.4%)
Belgium: $6.5 billion (4.3%)
France: $6.3 billion (4.1%)
Poland: $4.6 billion (3%)
Italy: $4 billion (2.6%)
Spain: $2.9 billion (1.9%)
***Japan: $2.2 billion (1.5%)
Russia: $2.1 billion (1.4%)
Norway:
United Kingdom: US$26.5 billion (21.6% of Norway’s total exports)
Germany: $19.7 billion (16%)
Netherlands: $13.1 billion (10.7%)
Sweden: $8.2 billion (6.7%)
France: $8.2 billion (6.7%)
Belgium: $6.4 billion (5.2%)
Denmark: $5.8 billion (4.7%)
United States: $5.7 billion (4.7%)
Poland: $2.8 billion (2.3%)
***China: $2.6 billion (2.1%)
Spain: $2.2 billion (1.8%)
Finland: $2 billion (1.6%)
Italy: $1.6 billion (1.3%)
***Japan: $1.4 billion (1.2%)
***South Korea: $1.4 billion (1.1%)
Finland:
Germany: US$9.3 billion (13.7% of total Finnish exports)
Sweden: $6.3 billion (9.3%)
Netherlands: $4.4 billion (6.5%)
United States: $4.4 billion (6.4%)
Russia: $3.7 billion (5.5%)
***China: $3.7 billion (5.4%)
United Kingdom: $2.8 billion (4.2%)
Belgium: $2.1 billion (3.1%)
France: $2 billion (3%)
Estonia: $1.9 billion (2.8%)
Norway: $1.6 billion (2.4%)
Poland: $1.6 billion (2.4%)
Italy: $1.5 billion (2.2%)
***Japan: $1.1 billion (1.7%)
Spain: $1.1 billion (1.6%)
Lithuania
Russia: US$4.7 billion (14% of total Lithuanian exports)
Latvia: $3.2 billion (9.7%)
Poland: $2.7 billion (8.2%)
Germany: $2.5 billion (7.4%)
United States: $1.7 billion (5.2%)
Estonia: $1.7 billion (5%)
Sweden: $1.6 billion (4.9%)
Belarus: $1.3 billion (3.8%)
United Kingdom: $1.3 billion (3.8%)
Netherlands: $1.1 billion (3.3%)
Ukraine: $1 billion (3.1%)
Norway: $933.8 million (2.8%)
France: $837 million (2.5%)
Denmark: $833.9 million (2.5%)
Italy: $727.3 million (2.2%)
INTERMARIUM BLOCK
Poland:
Germany: US$63.3 billion (27.4% of total Polish exports)
Czech Republic: $14.8 billion (6.4%)
United Kingdom: $14.7 billion (6.4%)
France: $12.9 billion (5.6%)
Italy: $11.3 billion (4.9%)
Netherlands: $10.1 billion (4.4%)
Russia: $7 billion (3%)
Sweden: $6.4 billion (2.8%)
Spain: $6.2 billion (2.7%)
United States: $6.2 billion (2.7%)
Hungary: $6.1 billion (2.6%)
Slovakia: $5.8 billion (2.5%)
Belgium: $5.1 billion (2.2%)
Ukraine: $4.8 billion (2.1%)
Austria: $4.4 billion (1.9%)
Ukraine
Russia: US$3.9 billion (9.1% of total Ukrainian exports)
Poland: $2.7 billion (6.3%)
***Turkey: $2.5 billion (5.8%)
Italy: $2.5 billion (5.7%)
***India: $2.2 billion (5.1%)
***China: $2.1 billion (4.9%)
***Egypt: $1.8 billion (4.2%)
Germany: $1.8 billion (4%)
Netherlands: $1.7 billion (3.9%)
Hungary: $1.3 billion (3.1%)
Spain: $1.3 billion (2.9%)
Belarus: $1.1 billion (2.6%)
Romania: $844.2 million (1.94%)
United States: $834 million (1.92%)
Czech Republic: $715.4 million (1.6%)
Almost two-thirds (63.1%) of Ukrainian exports in 2017 were delivered to the above 15 trading partners.
Slovakia
Germany: US$17.5 billion (20.7% of total Slovak exports)
Czech Republic: $9.8 billion (11.6%)
Poland: $6.5 billion (7.7%)
France: $5.3 billion (6.3%)
Italy: $5.1 billion (6.1%)
United Kingdom: $5.1 billion (6%)
Hungary: $5.1 billion (6%)
Austria: $5.1 billion (6%)
Spain: $2.5 billion (2.9%)
United States: $2.3 billion (2.7%)
Netherlands: $2.2 billion (2.6%)
Romania: $2.1 billion (2.5%)
Russia: $1.8 billion (2.1%)
China: $1.4 billion (1.6%)
Switzerland: $1.3 billion (1.6%)
Romania
Germany: US$16.2 billion (22.9% of total Romanian exports)
Italy: $7.9 billion (11.1%)
France: $4.8 billion (6.7%)
Hungary: $3.3 billion (4.7%)
United Kingdom: $2.9 billion (4.1%)
Bulgaria: $2.34 billion (3.3%)
Turkey: $2.33 billion (3.3%)
Poland: $2.2 billion (3.1%)
Spain: $2.1 billion (3%)
Czech Republic: $2 billion (2.9%)
Netherlands: $1.8 billion (2.6%)
Austria: $1.6 billion (2.3%)
Belgium: $1.4 billion (2%)
Russia: $1.25 billion (1.8%)
Slovakia: $1.21 billion (1.7%)
Czech Republic:
Germany: US$65.2 billion (32.2% of total Czechian exports)
Slovakia: $15.2 billion (7.5%)
Poland: $12.2 billion (6%)
France: $10.2 billion (5.1%)
United Kingdom: $9.5 billion (4.7%)
Austria: $9 billion (4.4%)
Italy: $7.8 billion (3.9%)
Netherlands: $7.5 billion (3.7%)
Spain: $6 billion (3%)
Hungary: $6 billion (3%)
Belgium: $4.3 billion (2.1%)
Russia: $4.1 billion (2%)
United States: $4.1 billion (2%)
Sweden: $3.5 billion (1.7%)
Romania: $3 billion (1.5%)
Over four-fifths (82.9%) of Czechian exports in 2018 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.
RUSSIAN IMPERIAL BLOCK
Russia:
***China: US$56 billion (12.5% of total Russian exports)
Netherlands: $43.5 billion (9.7%)
Germany: $34.1 billion (7.6%)
Belarus: $21.8 billion (4.9%)
***Turkey: $21.3 billion (4.8%)
***South Korea: $17.8 billion (4%)
Poland: $16.5 billion (3.7%)
Italy: $16.4 billion (3.7%)
Kazakhstan: $12.9 billion (2.9%)
United States: $12.5 billion (2.8%)
***Japan: $12.5 billion (2.8%)
Finland: $11.4 billion (2.5%)
United Kingdom: $9.8 billion (2.2%)
Ukraine: $9.5 billion (2.1%)
Belgium: $9.2 billion (2%)
Belarus
Russia: US$12.9 billion (38.5% of total Belarusian exports)
Ukraine: $4.1 billion (12.1%)
United Kingdom: $3.1 billion (9.2%)
Germany: $1.4 billion (4.3%)
Netherlands: $1.4 billion (4.3%)
Poland: $1.3 billion (4%)
Lithuania: $1.2 billion (3.4%)
Kazakhstan: $780.1 million (2.3%)
Brazil: $585.1 million (1.7%)
Latvia: $471.9 million (1.4%)
China: $467.9 million (1.4%)
India: $299 million (0.9%)
United States: $274.3 million (0.8%)
Indonesia: $227.4 million (0.7%)
Azerbaijan: $223.8 million (0.7%)
Approaching nine-tenths (85.8%) of Belarusian exports in 2018 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.
Georgia:
Russia: US$400.8 million (15.8% of Georgia’s total exports)
Bulgaria: $250 million (9.8%)
Turkey: $226.3 million (8.9%)
China: $181.3 million (7.1%)
Azerbaijan: $165.8 million (6.5%)
United States: $157.8 million (6.2%)
Ukraine: $119.1 million (4.7%)
Armenia: $105.6 million (4.2%)
Spain: $65.8 million (2.6%)
Switzerland: $62.5 million (2.5%)
Iran: $60.6 million (2.4%)
Uzbekistan: $58.7 million (2.3%)
Romania: $56.1 million (2.2%)
Germany: $47 million (1.9%)
France: $43.3 million (1.7%)
Almost four-fifths (78.8%) of Georgian exports during 2018 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.
OLD EUROPE
Greece
Italy: US$4.1 billion (10.3% of total Greek exports)
Germany: $2.5 billion (6.4%)
Turkey: $2.4 billion (6.1%)
Cyprus: $2.2 billion (5.7%)
Bulgaria: $1.8 billion (4.5%)
Lebanon: $1.8 billion (4.5%)
United States: $1.6 billion (4.1%)
United Kingdom: $1.4 billion (3.6%)
Egypt: $1.4 billion (3.5%)
Spain: $1.3 billion (3.3%)
France: $1.2 billion (3%)
Romania: $1.1 billion (2.9%)
China: $1.1 billion (2.7%)
Macedonia: $939.7 million (2.4%)
Saudi Arabia: $850.4 million (2.2%)
Almost two-thirds (65.1%) of Greek exports in 2018 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.
Bulgaria
Germany: US$3.6 billion (13.6% of total Bulgarian exports)
Italy: $2.4 billion (9.2%)
Romania: $2.3 billion (8.8%)
Turkey: $2.1 billion (8%)
Greece: $1.8 billion (7%)
France: $1.2 billion (4.5%)
Spain: $733.1 million (2.8%)
Belgium: $715.1 million (2.7%)
Netherlands: $706.3 million (2.7%)
United Kingdom: $656.3 million (2.5%)
Poland: $648.2 million (2.5%)
Austria: $507.5 million (1.9%)
Serbia: $494.9 million (1.9%)
China: $481.2 million (1.8%)
Czech Republic: $445.3 million (1.7%)
Almost three-quarters (71.8%) of Bulgarian exports in 2017 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.
(apologies to the rest)
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 13:05:00 UTC
The one child policy is not a time bomb. It’s preparation for automation and the lack of need for redistribution.
The chinese and japanese methods are the ones to copy.
Ethnocentrism closed borders, automation.
The singapore method for rule and social insurance.
The rest of the world that does otherwise will starve.
There is no market value that they can provide compared to machines.
We just bred billions of people who cannot survive the coming corrections.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-15 18:48:00 UTC
—“Adding it all up, the average cost of a smartphone plan with data in the U.S. with the 4 mobile network operators is $115 per month (the reality is, T-Mobile is weighing down the average and it has the smallest subscriber base, so I’m being generous here).”—
My total utility bill, including heat, water, electricity, cable, and cell phone in ukraine was something on the order of $60.
There is ZERO reason we don’t pay the same.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-15 14:53:00 UTC
Already happening. only yang value prop is sympathy and 1k a month that is just a gift to landlords and nothing else. With guns his campaign fails. if h won it would trigger civil war
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-15 01:50:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106372161671966720
Reply addressees: @touchdownHtown @AndrewYangVFA @JackPosobiec
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106364655570747393
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106364655570747393