(FB 1551278999 Timestamp) LIBERTARIAN FREE TRADE VS PROPERTARIAN FREE TRADE —“Are you for a free market or against it? I’m curious. I can never really tell with you.”— Matthew What is the limit of a free market? In other words, a ‘free market’ like ‘NAP’ is a half truth in order to propagate a lie. At what point are you stealing from the shareholders of the polity? —“The libertarian concept of property is lacking, I agree.”— So we fix libertarianism’s half-truth half-lie: Rule of law with warranty of due diligence of a full accounting of externalities means free trade by reciprocity to the limits of proportionality. So I teach full accounting not ‘limitless free trade’.
Theme: Incentives
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551280113 Timestamp) UNDERSTAND NEGATIVE VS POSITIVE COMPETITION (The Economics of Time) (core) In positive ( market ) competition we compete for the seizure of unseized opportunities (potential capital), by increasing the time content of the products and services we offer whether by price or quality. In negative (anti-market) competition we compete for the seizure of previously seized opportunities, thereby stealing (decreasing) the time content (existential capital). Capital consists of a store of time produced by human actions. When we divide labor we decrease the time demand for production. In the via negativa, we do not produce more, we increase the rate of production in time. All of economics is the study of time and energy just like all of physics is the study of time and energy. The difference is that universe can’t choose, and because we can remember, act, sympathize, and cooperate, we can save time. In this sense we are not wealthier than our pre-language ancestors, we have simply made everything drastically cheaper by cooperating and saving time, first in production and second in the form of capital: stored time.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551278999 Timestamp) LIBERTARIAN FREE TRADE VS PROPERTARIAN FREE TRADE —“Are you for a free market or against it? I’m curious. I can never really tell with you.”— Matthew What is the limit of a free market? In other words, a ‘free market’ like ‘NAP’ is a half truth in order to propagate a lie. At what point are you stealing from the shareholders of the polity? —“The libertarian concept of property is lacking, I agree.”— So we fix libertarianism’s half-truth half-lie: Rule of law with warranty of due diligence of a full accounting of externalities means free trade by reciprocity to the limits of proportionality. So I teach full accounting not ‘limitless free trade’.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551383619 Timestamp) THE FOUNDATIONS OF ECONOMICS (COOPERATION) = TIME The opportunities in a market are limited by the requirement that we not impose costs by externality upon the investments of others causing the loss of capital in territorial, physical, institutional, cultural, normative, informational, familial, and genetic assets. Markets allow us to create opportunity through proximity – decreasing opportunity costs of time, and thru informational, informal, and formal institutions, and physical infrastructure as a common good – each decreasing opportunity costs of time.These market opportunities are produced as a common good. We can then serve the common good by converting opportunity into exchanges, each of which creates more than it consumes by the service of the coincidence of wants. (time savings). We create opportunities for temporal compression through the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy, and seize them through the identification of a coincidence of wants, thereby converting the potential for temporal compression into the existential compression of time. And it is through this temporal compression that we, collectively, in increasing scales, constantly reduce the cost of existence, and defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, and scarcity. If you understand this you will understand all of human civilization, consists of time saving – and the reason we have achieved what no other creatures have achieved. We must defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, distance, and scarcity, and we do so through cooperation, and we cooperate through the incremental suppression of the imposition of costs on one another upon life, body, kin, possessions, and interests, in the form of violence, theft, fraud, falsehood, conspiracy, rents and free-riding. We accomplish this incremental suppression by the demand for a warranty of due diligence for our products(materials), services(actions), and information(speech) and the prosecution, restitution, punishment, ostracization, or execution, of those who circumvent that Warranty of Reciprocity by production, action, or speech. This leaves us with no option but to participate in voluntary markets under which we limit our productions, actions, and speech to that which consists of productive, fully informed (truthful), warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of imposition of cost upon the life, kin, possessions, and interests of others by externality. This explains why time is the principle asset from which all of human existence emerges through the continuous discounting of time costs through an ever expanding division of labor, with ever expanding suppressions of parasitism.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551379605 Timestamp) —“Psychology, education, health professions, social work… I can’t help but notice that those fields offer positions outside the market (where consumers are not payers). We’re taxing men so that we can subsidise jobs to women. Paying for our own destruction.”—Vengefül Bobmoran —“Adding to your last line a bit: Paying them to rob us and give food, clothing and shelter to biological parasites.”—Andrew Gribble
-
(FB 1551378161 Timestamp) MEN NEED INCENTIVES, AND WOMEN HAVE NO END OF “SELFISH
(FB 1551378161 Timestamp) MEN NEED INCENTIVES, AND WOMEN HAVE NO END OF “SELFISHNESS” (CONSUMPTION) —“We are the minds which set the body of tomorrow in motion.”— Michael D Abbott The Feminists and Postmodernists assume a steady state. That a sufficient minority of men will not reach the point where they say “Every other alternative is better than this one.”
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551376817 Timestamp) WE DON”T SELL PROP., WE SELL APPLICATIONS OF PROP. —“if we wish for P to grow and become widespread we have to make it attractive to many people – not just a niche group of westerners.”— Agreed. But we don’t’ sell P, we sell application of p, any more than we sell programming languages rather than programs that do stuff. P serves as a programming language for social orders.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551379605 Timestamp) —“Psychology, education, health professions, social work… I can’t help but notice that those fields offer positions outside the market (where consumers are not payers). We’re taxing men so that we can subsidise jobs to women. Paying for our own destruction.”—Vengefül Bobmoran —“Adding to your last line a bit: Paying them to rob us and give food, clothing and shelter to biological parasites.”—Andrew Gribble
-
(FB 1551378161 Timestamp) MEN NEED INCENTIVES, AND WOMEN HAVE NO END OF “SELFISH
(FB 1551378161 Timestamp) MEN NEED INCENTIVES, AND WOMEN HAVE NO END OF “SELFISHNESS” (CONSUMPTION) —“We are the minds which set the body of tomorrow in motion.”— Michael D Abbott The Feminists and Postmodernists assume a steady state. That a sufficient minority of men will not reach the point where they say “Every other alternative is better than this one.”
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551376817 Timestamp) WE DON”T SELL PROP., WE SELL APPLICATIONS OF PROP. —“if we wish for P to grow and become widespread we have to make it attractive to many people – not just a niche group of westerners.”— Agreed. But we don’t’ sell P, we sell application of p, any more than we sell programming languages rather than programs that do stuff. P serves as a programming language for social orders.