RAND SCREWED IT UP.
It’s not selfishness silly, it’s creating commons. We direct self interest to the production of goods, and eliminate (suppress) all bads.
It’s not selfishness.
ITS COMPETENCE.
It’s all you CAN know.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-19 20:27:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1152313973645205504
@JohnRivers Ukraine. I paid 25 bucks for both. No reason for it. Look at the data on where they spend the money: marketing.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-18 17:17:54 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102463587923224869
@NOTYOURDOG@TomKawczynski That’s not really fair. People start with loose positions and narrow them as they either learn the material, or learn the demands of the market for candidates. I just think that if you’ve got policy recommendations you state them, rather than ask people who you need to promote you to pay for them. the value of a book is to educate people on the reasons WHY you took those policy positions.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-16 20:19:07 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102452975827560814
If you are male, over 40, fit, and even vaguely interesting you have very high ‘market value’. In my experience your market value does not decline as long as you are fit, ‘groomed’, and even vaguely interesting.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-14 00:17:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1150197508175478785
@TomKawczynski Can you define traditionalism in some way that is actionable ; some way that can be embedded in institutions of government; that provides incentives to those in government to act according to the definitions; and some way that doesn’t require anyone with above a room temperature IQ to profess conviction for a rather obvious string of falsehoods and lies.
This isnt a fight for sentiments, or ideas, but against culture-cide, genocide and a repeat of the dark ages of ignorance.
Either we apply organized violence as did the founding fathers to produce an organ of state that suits our interests or we’re repeating the wishful thinking of those christian men who came before us, and were made fools by history for their optimism in man.
all that matters is if people show up to fight.
Everything else is ritual sedation.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-13 00:32:47 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102431324043571219
Bill Joslin Pivot gets easier by the day. Market demand increases. Everything proceeding accordingly…
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 16:34:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1149718686661521409
5) Because emotional burden (expectations) are painful, but not material. Ergo, the only solution that does not cascade into even worse conditions is to raise the cost of error so that it does not happen with any regularity. This is the court’s mission in the end.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 13:12:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1149667821539823623
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1149667259071094785
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
4) So, given that the egg-producer must voluntarily give up her eggs (in lieu of crisis) this is rather settled law (not overridden by cultural or popular appeal) under natural law, in that the transfer was involuntary, accidental, the clinic responsible and restitution possible.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1149667259071094785
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
4) So, given that the egg-producer must voluntarily give up her eggs (in lieu of crisis) this is rather settled law (not overridden by cultural or popular appeal) under natural law, in that the transfer was involuntary, accidental, the clinic responsible and restitution possible.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1149667259071094785
YOU DON’T PERSUADE PARASITES
—“You don’t persuade parasites – you implement law that disincentivizes their behaviour. Persuasion is for moral posturing and marketing – law is for molding human behaviour.”—Bill Joslin
Three sentences. All quotable. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:53:48 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426216262854360
(…continued)
Why? “The desire for equality under poverty, monopoly under the herd, authority over markets, and feminine dysgenia over masculine eugenia.:
“The Mindless Equalitarian Dysgenic Herd.”
There is and can never be equality. The demand for equality is to devolve mankind to one’s own lowest level – as an animal. The demand of aristocracy is to evolve mankind into one’s own level – transcend the animal into reason. THe anglo enlightenment experiment has been one of attempting to raise man into an ‘aristocracy of everyone’ and it has failed because only our kin appear able to do so – and even then some men and many women resist it.
The reason Jewish Christians are “Cucks’ and do not fight against the enemy is because their debt, loyalty, and fealty, is to the ancestral enemy of our people – and not to Family, Kith, Kin, Nature, Excellence and heroism, Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Jury and Law and Markets in Every Aspect of Life.
The reason Aryan Christians are ‘not cucks’ is that we fight against the enemy because our debt, loyalty, reality is to our ancestors, Family, Kith, Kin, Nature, Excellence and heroism, Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Jury and Law and Markets in Every Aspect of Life.
Choose Aryan Christianity of Kin and our persistence, or Semitic Christianity of the Enemy against our kin and your extermination.
I am An Aryan, An Aristotelian, A Heathen, A Christian.
Because that is all I can be, while maintaining the debt, loyalty, and fealty to my kin, my people, my ancestors, nature, the universe, and transcendence of man into the great gods our ancients imagined.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:48:00 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426193407615382
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426191435493947
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
CHOOSE ARYAN CHRISTIAN OF KIN OR SEMITIC CHRISTIAN AGAINST THEM I am, first, and foremost: 1) An Aryan(The primacy of man, heroism, excellence, reciprocity, truth before face, aristocratic egalitarianism), 2) Aristotelian(Naturalism, Truth regardless of cost), an;d 3) Heathen (Debt only to Nature and Ancestors, Ward of Nature). I cannot be those things, if I practice the supernatural over the natural, the irrational over the rational, and false debt over existential debt. I can however, be: 4) a scientific and rational christian, if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: i) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. ii) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. iii) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, iiii) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. These are truths. And no claim of truth nor good can require I: a) abandon the difference between man and animal by abandoning reason; b) claim belief in a falsehood; c) owe debt, loyalty, or fealty to other than my kith and kin. Yet it is Abrahamic Semitism that asks (a) abandon reason, (b) claim belief in falsehood, and (c) owe debt loyalty or fealty to other than my kith and kin. The Semitic technique of Abrahamic lying is: (a) False promise(lying), (b) Sophism(lying), (c) Straw Manning(lying), (d) Critique (lying), GSRRM(avoiding truth), (e) Denial(lying), (f) in exchange for ‘membership’ in a false family whose common interests is propagation of the lie, false promise, sophism, straw manning, critique, GSRRM, and denial. There is no difference between: (a) Judaism, (c) Christianity, (c) Islam and; (b) Marx-Freud-Frankfurt-Derrida et al: the marxists, socialists, psychologists, sociologists, feminists, postmodernists, denialists, and politically corrects (truth suppression) The First wave of Abrahamists created (a) Judaism to undermine, (b) Christianity to undermine further, and (c) Islam to conquer the undermined and weakened. … Against Aristocracy Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and Reason. The Second wave of Abrahamists replaced religion of the supernatural false promise, sophism, critique, and denial, with two attempts: (a) first Abrahamic pseudoscientific false promises sophism critique, and denial in marxism-socialism-freudianism-feminism. (b) then the Abrahamic sophistic false promises sophism critique, and denial with postmodernism, neo-liberalism, and political correctness. … Against Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and (Darwin!). (continued…)
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426191435493947
THINK DIFFERENTLY
What can we pay people to do to produce common goods and services if it takes fewer people esp. of limited ability to produce private goods and services?
What kinds of consumption can we reduce (what incentives can we change) so that the demand for consumption declines even further and availability of labor for the production of common goods and services increases further?
And do the private and and commons economies need to operate by the same means (prices, monies, currencies)?
Aren’t there three economies at least? Family, private production, and commons production?
Why do we think we must run them identically, and is that simply because we cannot imagine multiple currencies?
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:38:01 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424738634881711