Curt Doolittle

Theme: Incentives

  • You can’t use women’s endless demand for hyperconsumption (esp of attention) as

    You can’t use women’s endless demand for hyperconsumption (esp of attention) as vehicles for academic, commercial, and interest revenue, and expect them to bear the same costs out of civic ‘duty’ (as men do for sex). Any more than men military without offer of the franchise.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-16 17:16:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206624108122914817

    Reply addressees: @EricRWeinstein

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206619744507486209

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206619744507486209

  • People follow incentives. What percent of women obtain non-stem degrees at cost

    People follow incentives. What percent of women obtain non-stem degrees at cost $100k debt during peak fertility? What is female tax vs interest contribution? What percent of tax revenues to women consume vs men? And what percent of tax revenue to men contribute vs men? (I know.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-16 16:57:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206619244995235841

    Reply addressees: @EricRWeinstein

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206583253613735936

    IN REPLY TO:

    @EricRWeinstein

    There are an enormous number of young US women in their mid 20s to mid 30s who don’t appear to be prioritizing motherhood. Many of their parents have assets while many of them do not. No massive transfer is seen.

    I find the lack of major discussion on this biologically puzzling.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206583253613735936

  • So, we can decrease extractions from the (parasitic) financial sector, (parasiti

    So, we can decrease extractions from the (parasitic) financial sector, (parasitic) state sector, and (parasitic) old age sector, and keep people fit and working younger and older to match longer life spans. (We have to end the keynesian dependency on employment, debt, growth).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-16 16:51:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206617739248488448

    Reply addressees: @PushmanRichard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206617202302078977

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @PushmanRichard e) Regulate or nationalize extractive industries that are necessary infrastructure (most of big tech). Cell, cable, internet should be, like electricity and water, trivial costs.
    f) automate on the japanese model. g) end and reverse immigration.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206617202302078977

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @PushmanRichard e) Regulate or nationalize extractive industries that are necessary infrastructure (most of big tech). Cell, cable, internet should be, like electricity and water, trivial costs.
    f) automate on the japanese model. g) end and reverse immigration.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206617202302078977

  • e) push education by apprenticeship simulation down into grade, junior, and high

    e) push education by apprenticeship simulation down into grade, junior, and high schools. f) end income taxes on physical hardship jobs (trades). Why? Medical and Retirement funds are the problem. Decline in returns on investments is causing it. …

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-16 16:43:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206615884976050181

    Reply addressees: @PushmanRichard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206614710843564040

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @PushmanRichard Maybe. a) convert retirement and health to forced savings that the state invests in long term (proactive) returns. b) eliminate consumer interest, c) eliminate govt pensions, increase mil pay. d) require any pension fully funded at all times, d) end non stem college education…

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206614710843564040

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @PushmanRichard Maybe. a) convert retirement and health to forced savings that the state invests in long term (proactive) returns. b) eliminate consumer interest, c) eliminate govt pensions, increase mil pay. d) require any pension fully funded at all times, d) end non stem college education…

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206614710843564040

  • Maybe. a) convert retirement and health to forced savings that the state invests

    Maybe. a) convert retirement and health to forced savings that the state invests in long term (proactive) returns. b) eliminate consumer interest, c) eliminate govt pensions, increase mil pay. d) require any pension fully funded at all times, d) end non stem college education…

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-16 16:38:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206614710843564040

    Reply addressees: @PushmanRichard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206552302498275328

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206552302498275328

  • “The length of time for the “expected value” to equilibrate can be long.”– Corr

    –“The length of time for the “expected value” to equilibrate can be long.”–

    Correct. Intel appears to have many variables, and the more variables that must equilibrate the more time it takes.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-15 22:19:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206337898016104448

    Reply addressees: @FrostieCash @rasmansa

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206233472345530369

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206233472345530369

  • Well you know, the question is, can you scale enough to seize the market opportu

    Well you know, the question is, can you scale enough to seize the market opportunity Google youtube are giving you, or are you more ideological than you are in in service of the public interest.

    There are good vc’s. They are smaller vc’s.
    (I want to integrate apps with BC.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-15 17:14:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206261320762441730

    Reply addressees: @bitchute @chamath

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206260845065330689

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206260845065330689

  • Evolution favors it ingroup because it limits cheating (parasitism), which elimi

    Evolution favors it ingroup because it limits cheating (parasitism), which eliminates the incentive to cooperate for those groups that survive by cooperation and depend on non-defection.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-15 17:09:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206259962982359041

    Reply addressees: @Abhiman11678846

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206227688991539201

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206227688991539201

  • No. War is the most rewarding entrepreneurial enterprise.

    —“Every new war is started up to cover up the fact that the old war solved nothing.”–@StefanMolyneux

    Not true. Europeans use civil wars that last a generation or more every few centuries in order to continue rapid adaptation to change. In fact, constant warfare between small states is one of our civilizations most enduring advantages. War, Politics, Economics, Innovation, competition, and argument are all the same process at different scales. War isn’t politics by other means Religion, Politics, Economics, Competition, Innovation, and Argument are war by other means. War is a constant in human history with the red queen the ultimate enemy.

    1. European Thirty Years war
    2. French Revolution (Anti-Anglo-Germanic)
    3. German Revolution (Unification) (anti-french)
    4. Jewish Revolution (Anti-west: Marxism, Russian Bolshevism, European civil war, Fascism, American conquest of british empire.)
    5. Muslim Revolution (Fundamentalism, immigration)
    6. Anglo Empiricism won.
    7. Almost done w/ French revolution (disaster)
    8. Close to done w/ Jewish Century (feminine monopoly universalism)
    9. Not done with the Muslim Century (second muslim conquest)
    10. Returning to the world balance of powers between civilizations.
    11. Fascism (nationalism) won.

    Even better: The American Military is FREE. Yes. It’s FREE. Doesn’t cost us a dime. We finance it on the rest of the world, and inflate it away. In effect, the world uses the USD as a stock certificate for the preservation of world patterns of finance and trade, and americans get their military and a 40% improvement in standard of living because of it.Politics, Economics,  Canadians, Europeans, and Australians benefit from a military that is fundamentally FREE. And yet they have no militaries to speak of. War is the most profitable enterprise a group can undertake. Genocides are the most profitable wars a group can undertake. There are over 500 known ‘dead gods’ for a reason. I don’t do comforting lies. Truth is what it is. All else is just choice.  

  • No. War is the most rewarding entrepreneurial enterprise.

    —“Every new war is started up to cover up the fact that the old war solved nothing.”–@StefanMolyneux

    Not true. Europeans use civil wars that last a generation or more every few centuries in order to continue rapid adaptation to change. In fact, constant warfare between small states is one of our civilizations most enduring advantages. War, Politics, Economics, Innovation, competition, and argument are all the same process at different scales. War isn’t politics by other means Religion, Politics, Economics, Competition, Innovation, and Argument are war by other means. War is a constant in human history with the red queen the ultimate enemy.

    1. European Thirty Years war
    2. French Revolution (Anti-Anglo-Germanic)
    3. German Revolution (Unification) (anti-french)
    4. Jewish Revolution (Anti-west: Marxism, Russian Bolshevism, European civil war, Fascism, American conquest of british empire.)
    5. Muslim Revolution (Fundamentalism, immigration)
    6. Anglo Empiricism won.
    7. Almost done w/ French revolution (disaster)
    8. Close to done w/ Jewish Century (feminine monopoly universalism)
    9. Not done with the Muslim Century (second muslim conquest)
    10. Returning to the world balance of powers between civilizations.
    11. Fascism (nationalism) won.

    Even better: The American Military is FREE. Yes. It’s FREE. Doesn’t cost us a dime. We finance it on the rest of the world, and inflate it away. In effect, the world uses the USD as a stock certificate for the preservation of world patterns of finance and trade, and americans get their military and a 40% improvement in standard of living because of it.Politics, Economics,  Canadians, Europeans, and Australians benefit from a military that is fundamentally FREE. And yet they have no militaries to speak of. War is the most profitable enterprise a group can undertake. Genocides are the most profitable wars a group can undertake. There are over 500 known ‘dead gods’ for a reason. I don’t do comforting lies. Truth is what it is. All else is just choice.