Theme: Incentives

  • YOUR BASIC LESSON ON MONEY (CURRENCY) AND 99% OF EVERYTHING YOU EVER NEED TO KNO

    YOUR BASIC LESSON ON MONEY (CURRENCY) AND 99% OF EVERYTHING YOU EVER NEED TO KNOW

    —“Could you please explain what you mean by “the problem of hard currency”?”—Niklas Wagner

    0) Money Proper means Commodity Money (a commodity used for monetary purposes in exchange. It must be light and of limited volume, and indexed (with a measurement), and either scarce by it’s limited existence in the natural world or very difficult to replicate and therefore artificially scarce.

    1) A money substitute is anything used in place of money proper. Currency is one of the many types of money substitutes. Currency began as ‘Notes’, which were literally tickets that could be redeemed for money proper.

    2) Hard currency means a currency(money substitute) backed by, and redeemable for, commodity money (gold, silver, etc).

    3) Soft currency means unbacked by or redeemable for, commodity money (gold, silver, etc), or only partly backed by commodity money, or interests in real property (liens).

    5) Shares are a tradable commodity backed only by market demand for them – but granting (fictitious) rights in case of liquidity (bankruptcy or sale).

    4) Fiat money is a share in the economy (government really), that is used as a soft currency substitute, that like shares, when printed, decreases the value (purchasing power) of other existing shares. In theory we would produce the same amount of new fiat money as we increased value in the country overall.

    THEREFORE

    Hard currency runs short whenever economic velocity increases, and so it appreciates, but it appreciates without contribution to production. Interest on lending to business and industry contributes to production. So appreciation on currency is a form of free riding (rent seeking), where interest in production is not. Fiat currency that prohibits currency appreciation but does not create purchasing power depreciation, prevents free riding on currency appreciation but preserves interest returns that contribute to production. This is, in large part, why the government targets interest rates to judge the money supply. However, they also try to target unemployment. this is the mistake. We can push money from consumers to the banking system for free instead of charging consumers and profiting the banking system.

    —More by William L. Benge—

    The Road to Commonwealth, Insurer of Last Resort.

    1. We know that gold and other forms of money were not always controlled by secular authorities as (or, in the manner in which) they presently are.

    2. Since we hold (successfully argue for) that government must (and does) satisfy utility as insurer of last resort, we are forced by the same to acknowledge the legitimacy of what is NATIONAL fiat currency and what is fair finance for domestics. This is not strained reasoning, simply more nuanced.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 13:04:00 UTC

  • It’s bait. We prefer reciprocity from others but we prefer rent seeking for ours

    It’s bait. We prefer reciprocity from others but we prefer rent seeking for ourselves. That’s step one of the argument. Man isnt moral. Morality is just an advantage. And it’s only an advantage within limits. And so what are the personal, social, political, and national limits?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 20:33:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217182974225145857

    Reply addressees: @Ozpin_88 @DeplorableDJDJ

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217179797513801729


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217179797513801729

  • Second, that man organizes, so people organize in pursuit of free riding, rent s

    Second, that man organizes, so people organize in pursuit of free riding, rent seeking, and socialization of losses MORE than they do for reciprocity. Again, suppressed by markets for suppression of irreciprocity: court and law.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 17:37:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217138567740297223

    Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217138291679596546


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DeplorableDJDJ I think you’re missing my point. It’s that the market demand for irreciprocal behavior has required incremental suppression under the law of tort (property) paid for by exchange of local rents and friction for centralization of fees (taxes) and lowering friction+higher velocity.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217138291679596546


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @DeplorableDJDJ I think you’re missing my point. It’s that the market demand for irreciprocal behavior has required incremental suppression under the law of tort (property) paid for by exchange of local rents and friction for centralization of fees (taxes) and lowering friction+higher velocity.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217138291679596546

  • Which means absolutely nothing. If we gave out the same (10k) randomly every wee

    Which means absolutely nothing. If we gave out the same (10k) randomly every week to .0000001% of the population that would tell us nothing about UBI – which will simply mean increases in rents for landlords, as they’ll capture almost all of it.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 16:27:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217121191766450181

    Reply addressees: @voxdotcom @yousuck2020

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217120221204570112


    IN REPLY TO:

    @voxdotcom

    Japanese billionaire Yusaku Maezawa (@yousuck2020) plans to give away 1 billion Japanese yen — about $9 million — to 1,000 random Twitter followers this week. https://t.co/g6239G25Ds

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217120221204570112

  • I think the business model problem is more cause of distraction than decline in

    I think the business model problem is more cause of distraction than decline in ability.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-13 22:35:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216851295451205638

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216841864843800578


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216841864843800578

  • Yes, well, it’s not an either or proposition but a both proposition – one that i

    Yes, well, it’s not an either or proposition but a both proposition – one that is paid for by limiting the cost of the underclasses so that proceeds can be directed to the production of commons – excellences. In man, society, AND economy.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-13 22:25:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216848869788659714

    Reply addressees: @Armpickle13 @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216847942994354177


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216847942994354177

  • Every economic theory contains an insight, a presumption of man, and a presumpti

    Every economic theory contains an insight, a presumption of man, and a presumption of the optimism of the model. The fact they the consumer financial system is unnecessary or extractive, and that liquidity should go directly to consumers is true. The rest is absolute nonsense.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-13 15:36:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216745821137440768

    Reply addressees: @reddog_aus @jeffreyatucker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216744231336759297


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216744231336759297

  • GOHN I’ve followed this guy for quite a few years as an example of someone whose

    https://www.bing.com/search?q=carlos+gohn+arrested&PC=U316&FORM=CHROMNCARLOS GOHN

    I’ve followed this guy for quite a few years as an example of someone whose empirical management and workload was something I simply had to be in awe of. I don’t know if he’s guilty of anything yet but his skill is certainly something to study. He was brutal (american) in both France and Japan. He did a job wth Renault. Then he saved Nissan. But he’s been accused of financial reporting issues. Running both Renault and Nissan at the same time. But this put Japanese and french companies in conflict because Nissan is far better in engineering and selling into both Asia and america. This was a mistake. He should have taken one or the other. And he was … excessively greedy in executive compensation. Japan, esp, does not tolerate high exec pay. I”m not sure what he’s being accused of is a ‘crime’.

    Mixing companies across cultures does not work well.

    https://www.bing.com/search?q=carlos+gohn+arrested&PC=U316&FORM=CHROMNUpdated Jan 13, 2020, 4:04 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-13 04:04:00 UTC

  • 2 If we test intelligence, and the Big5 traits we see that success is determined

    2 If we test intelligence, and the Big5 traits we see that success is determined MORE by trait conscientiousness than by intelligence, and that intelligence increases income only because it grants access to problems of greater complexity. Intelligence REDUCES ERROR in complexity.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-12 19:22:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216440421892722688

    Reply addressees: @ovjocm @JayWamsted @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216439799873245184


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ovjocm @JayWamsted @charlesmurray 1. AFAIK, (g) is the most accurate measure in psychology, and stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social sciences. The problem with testing is casting (g) separately from personality traits (which it is), and therefore not ALSO testing for trait-conscientiousness.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1216439799873245184


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ovjocm @JayWamsted @charlesmurray 1. AFAIK, (g) is the most accurate measure in psychology, and stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social sciences. The problem with testing is casting (g) separately from personality traits (which it is), and therefore not ALSO testing for trait-conscientiousness.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1216439799873245184

  • I dont kiss and tell but I’ll state from experience that a woman’s perception th

    I dont kiss and tell but I’ll state from experience that a woman’s perception that you will alter her or her children’s socio-economic status is reflected in response and performance. I can’t imagine the rock star, sport star effect. But it’s not like Tiger Woods worked at it. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1215495034168061953