Theme: Incentives

  • STATISM VS ANTI STATISM Her: “….” (I don’t want to bear and raise kids – I wan

    STATISM VS ANTI STATISM

    Her: “….” (I don’t want to bear and raise kids – I want to hyper-consume, socialize and virtue signal)

    Him” “….” (I don’t want to wage slave and pay taxes – I want to raid, r-pe and pillage)

    The only difference is one requires the state and one the absence of it.

    State, Government, Judiciary, Market, Marriage, Family are the compromise between the genders. These compromises are the equilibrium under which we all get the best we can get even if some or many of us could get better at the expense of others.

    There is a reason all civil wars begin with an excess of unmarried males.

    Incentives.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-22 16:23:00 UTC

  • END THE FALSE DICHOTOMY: RULE OF LAW PRODUCES ALL The optimum balance between ma

    END THE FALSE DICHOTOMY: RULE OF LAW PRODUCES ALL

    The optimum balance between market economy and non-market economy is calculated by tests of reciprocity. In other words, good capitalism is the result of rule of law of reciprocity and bad capitalism is the result of failing at rule of law of reciprocity. Just as good combination of market economy(liberty), mixed economy (freedom), state provision (serfdom), and military service (indentured servitude) is calculated by rule of law of reciprocity. The ((())) lie of the left was another monopoly, another idealism, that one way is somehow superior to tri-functionalism and rule of law producing markets in everything INCLUDING consumption (markets for goods, services, and information) and markets for commons (mixed economy), state production (serfdom) and state military servitude (indentured servitude)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-22 12:06:00 UTC

  • “This nation was not built on free trade.”—Nathan Borup Free trade is a ((()))

    —“This nation was not built on free trade.”—Nathan Borup

    Free trade is a ((())) leftist agenda. We either have fully reciprocal trade or not. If we have fully reciprocal trade we will have the freest trade reciprocally possible – and that is the optimum. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-22 12:00:00 UTC

  • (from elsewhere) You’re welcome. Although I’d ask you to read an entry level tex

    (from elsewhere)

    You’re welcome. Although I’d ask you to read an entry level textbook first on micro then on macro economics. then mises human action – realizing that the first half of the book is wrong but his method is good. Then rothbard’s mystery of banking, If you read most of hayek, and then learn hayekian triangles, then learn the austrian theory of the business cycle, then kondratiev waves, then strauss and how on generations, then read gary becker’s work, and if at that point you want to read my piece on reforming austrian economics, then that might be better than menger, bohm bawerk, and wieser or anyone else for that matter. After that there are about fifty different ‘rules of thumb’ or ‘principles’ in economic theory. Most of which you can learn just by reading an economics glossary over and over until you have it sort of memorized. After that it’s statistics and macro. The point of Austrian Econ is that it’s closest to RULE OF LAW and mainstream is FURTHEST from RULE OF LAW. ….


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 22:12:00 UTC

  • INFLATION IS THE FUEL OF CORRUPTION OF THE STATE By Francesco Principi (read and

    INFLATION IS THE FUEL OF CORRUPTION OF THE STATE

    By Francesco Principi

    (read and learn)

    This is the reason why the northeastern border of the Roman empire stopped at the Rhine river. The Germans were poor populations and therefore of no interest to the Romans

    The goal of the rulers who so badly governed was to coin and spend more. Caracalla thought that if he had removed some silver from the coins, nobody would have noticed and that he would have multiplied the money in circulation. It was ultimately a good thing for everyone.

    The Roman coin was the denarius, and from him comes the word money, it was initially pure silver. At the time of Augustus, the first emperor, each denarius was made up of 95% silver and 5% other metals, such as bronze. A century later, with Trajan, the percentage of silver was 85%. Eighty years later, Marcus Aurelius once again depreciated the denarius, bringing it to only 75% of silver. The denarius, therefore, had devalued by 20% in two centuries. A fairly tolerable thing. Caracalla, who was in great need of capital for his expenses, devalued the coin to leave us only 50 percent of silver; that is, he devalued it by 25 percent in one year.

    The aureus also lost value due to a legal provision. During the reign of Augustus, about forty coins came out of every pound of gold. Caracalla extended the pound until he also got out fifty coins which, of course, maintained the face value, but not the purchasing power.

    With such a monetary experiment and without the emperor predicting it, prices shot up. Caracalla missed the party: living in the countryside in Asia, he was stabbed by one of his guards while pissing on the edge of a road. A worthy end for one of the most impudent people in history.

    Those who came after him did nothing but make things worse. Almost all the emperors of the third century were military and almost all came to power following violent coups. There is a figure that says a lot: only one of them, Ostiliano, who reigned for six months in 251, died of natural causes; the rest fell at the hands of the guards or on the battlefield, generally against their successors. This period is defined by historians as “the crisis of the third century”. To tell the truth, they should speak of the end of Roman civilization, because from this moment on the Roman world became much more similar to the medieval period than to the classical one.

    Over the course of this century, the denarius never stopped devaluing, until it was converted into a piece of silver-plated bronze that quickly passed from hand to hand. But bad money, as the saying goes, passes from hand to hand and nobody keeps it. As for the aureus, it practically disappeared from circulation, and when it appeared it was thinned and adulterated. Inflation exceeded 1,000%, and this only with the fragmented data we have available: probably, in certain periods and in certain places it was even greater.

    After the political and economic chaos of the third century, Diocletian’s adjustment came and, without being able to resort to devaluation anymore, he crushed the inhabitants of the Empire with taxes and attempted a monetary reform. The reform failed and its edict sanctioning a price cap was completely ignored by people who, in less than a century, had gone from having silver money in their pockets to handling the so-called “follis”, small pieces of bronze of low value . The Romans had been staggeringly depleted in just a few decades because of the government; and with them the commerce, industry and agriculture of the Empire declined.

    The seed of the almighty state, always in need of funds to survive, had now taken root. Emperor Constantine suppressed the aureus and put into circulation a new gold coin, the solid, much depreciated compared to the previous one. An aureus of the ancients was worth, for the quantity of precious metal contained, two solids. The silver coin, adulterated to the point of nausea, disappeared from circulation.

    Constantine obtained the amount of gold necessary for the reform by confiscating it from the rich eastern cities and pagan temples, already in retreat behind the conversion of the Emperor to Christianity. To finance the functioning of the state, new taxes were invented that could only be paid in gold, the only form of payment accepted by foreign mercenaries who militated in the army. They were called barbarians, although, to tell the truth, even though they were barbarians, they were certainly not fools, since they were willing to gamble their lives only for real money.

    Gold turned into a refuge for those who could get it, that is, the military and high imperial officials. The rest of the population had to settle for the bronze in the bags and the copper of the informal money, illegally coined, which served as a small coin. The rich class of small owners and merchants, the ancient base of Roman greatness, was ruined without the possibility of recovery. There was therefore a concentration of land in the hands of a few large owners

    So we can conclude that inflation (beyond high taxation) is the fuel of any corrupt state.

    Having no large quantities of gold or precious metals, the Romans drew human capital from the Germanic populations and used them in their army.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 12:32:00 UTC

  • THE INCENTIVE FOR SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION —Social construction requires a false pr

    THE INCENTIVE FOR SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION

    —Social construction requires a false promise. The only viable false promises that scale for social construction are those that violate physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. Violating those laws baits the victims into hazard by violating those laws.—

    (worth repeating) (important)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 09:02:00 UTC

  • IS THE BIG LIE ULTIMATELY JUST SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM? Pretty much. Social constr

    IS THE BIG LIE ULTIMATELY JUST SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM?

    Pretty much. Social construction is how the big lies are created. But let’s go a little deeper and understand why.

    —-“Among the most intriguing ideas for improving fairness in our economy–and creating capitalism that earns popular support–is “universal basic capital.” Spread the equity, give all a stake. “—Jonathan Haidt @JonHaidt

    https://berggruen.org/the-worldpost/articles/sharing-the-wealth-as-we-recover-health/

    Consensus, getting heads together, leadership, these are all village-thinking. The female intuition doesn’t scale. We have institutions and rule of law of tort for a reason – it scales, at the cost of suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, keeping natural selection.

    It wasn’t europeans that developed global religion, global marxism, global socialism, global cosmopolitanism, global postmodernism, global hbd-denialism, or europeans that undermined rule of law.

    It was feminine intuition, and people of it, that cannot scale.

    —” is the big lie ultimately just social constructivism?

    So they try to do social engineering that achieves nothing except psychologically abusing people.”—

    Social construction yes. Social construction requires a false promise. The only viable false promises that scale are those that violate physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. Violating those laws baits the victims into hazard.

    Female social construction > ((())) > The Left.

    Female Social Construction to Manage behavioral growth of children, using her seduction > The ((())) group strategy (undermining host peoples, while riding on their commons) > The Anti Evolutionary (domestication) Canon: Freud, Boas, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida, Trotsky-Kristol.

    So if ((())) war on western-sensemaking, our realism, naturalism, operationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity, testimony, commons, and eugenics, is a continuation of their ancient world rebellion against the masculine empires, and an involuntary rebellion against evolution-eugenics.

    This means if it’s genetic, as it is in our women,it’s irreparable, and separation is the only possibility. If it’s purely cultural (doesn’t appear to be) then it’s a matter of separating from their culture. Either way we have to outlaw it by requiring truthful reciprocal speech.

    Which is the purpose of my work on the law: to end the repeatedly successful use of abrahamic technique at destroying civilizations from within by false promise, baiting into hazard, selling to vulnerable women and the underclasses, and reversing east and west eugenics.

    We don’t need to increase ‘fairness’ or ‘social justice’ neither of which are either definable or measureable, but we need to return to suppression of the reproduction of those that cannot compete in the suite of market tests at whatever level of development that we’re in.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 08:08:00 UTC

  • The infantilized cannot compartmentalize intuition, emotion, sincerity, and symb

    The infantilized cannot compartmentalize intuition, emotion, sincerity, and symbolism from real world, profit-loss, rational choice, and calculation. The mature mind, can compartmentalize. For the infantile sincerity(in impulse) is true vs rationality(in reason) is insincere.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 20:06:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251602968731844608

    Reply addressees: @DeguTanya @buldursgait @BepDelta @Dark_TossEX @MarfamSilva @paxchristus0 @ReadLinkola

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251600691912536064

  • Most political conflict would rapidly dissipate if maintaining a checking accoun

    Most political conflict would rapidly dissipate if maintaining a checking account, accounting, basic economics, business economics, and macro economics was taught early in life. And if basic contracts were taught early in life. And if economic history were taught early in life.

    There is a reason they don’t teach it.

    So the state can lie.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 15:45:00 UTC

  • “That’s what it always comes down to, freedom from consequences. The false promi

    —“That’s what it always comes down to, freedom from consequences. The false promise of freedom from consequences is baiting into hazard as ignoring consequences must necessarily result in destruction.”—Andrew M Gilmour


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 15:43:00 UTC