Oct 23, 2019, 4:04 PM RIGHT ON SCHEDULE. LIKE CLOCKWORK How much more evidence d’ y’all need. I’m very good at what I do. Because I use data, demographics, and incentives, not wishful thinking. The worm turns… By the pricking of my thumbs, this way Revolution Comes!!!
Theme: Incentives
-
People Chose Their Self Interest – One Created for Them to Choose, but Which Was
People Chose Their Self Interest – One Created for Them to Choose, but Which Was Suicidal https://t.co/zC051nrIPl
-
People Chose Their Self Interest – One Created for Them to Choose, but Which Was
People Chose Their Self Interest – One Created for Them to Choose, but Which Was Suicidal https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/people-chose-their-self-interest-one-created-for-them-to-choose-but-which-was-suicidal/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 15:23:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267476793579233280
-
People Chose Their Self Interest – One Created for Them to Choose, but Which Was Suicidal
PEOPLE CHOSE THEIR SELF INTEREST – ONE CREATED FOR THEM TO CHOOSE, BUT WHICH WAS SUICIDAL
—“… so People figured out the game was a losing battle & decided to withdraw from society & their obligations to that society? So People have chosen an easier route, stop including those which make their lives harder… So we grow cold toward on another?”—Mak McDaddy @MakMcdaddy
We don’t just go cold (a feminine concern), we go to war (a masculine concern). People chose to follow their interests, which were interests created deliberately by our enemies: undermine rule of law, trust, norms, traditions, and the intergenerational family as the central institution of society, b/c of its natural effect of limiting parasitism and dysgenia. The used Marxism to undermine compromise between the classes, Feminism to undermine compromise between genders, Postmodernism to undermine identities, families, traditions, eugenics, science, and truth itself – and outright denial (political correctness) to suppress debate. Progressivism = lying and undermining for the purpose of hyperconsumption, largely of virtue signals.
-
People Chose Their Self Interest – One Created for Them to Choose, but Which Was Suicidal
PEOPLE CHOSE THEIR SELF INTEREST – ONE CREATED FOR THEM TO CHOOSE, BUT WHICH WAS SUICIDAL
—“… so People figured out the game was a losing battle & decided to withdraw from society & their obligations to that society? So People have chosen an easier route, stop including those which make their lives harder… So we grow cold toward on another?”—Mak McDaddy @MakMcdaddy
We don’t just go cold (a feminine concern), we go to war (a masculine concern). People chose to follow their interests, which were interests created deliberately by our enemies: undermine rule of law, trust, norms, traditions, and the intergenerational family as the central institution of society, b/c of its natural effect of limiting parasitism and dysgenia. The used Marxism to undermine compromise between the classes, Feminism to undermine compromise between genders, Postmodernism to undermine identities, families, traditions, eugenics, science, and truth itself – and outright denial (political correctness) to suppress debate. Progressivism = lying and undermining for the purpose of hyperconsumption, largely of virtue signals.
-
Right on Schedule. Like Clockwork
RIGHT ON SCHEDULE. LIKE CLOCKWORK How much more evidence d’ y’all need. I’m very good at what I do. Because I use data, demographics, and incentives, not wishful thinking. The worm turns… By the pricking of my thumbs, this way Revolution Comes!!! Note from me: After the (to me, rather amusing) initial reaction from a (from what I can tell, relatively small) group of people furiously counter-signaling any talk of “civil war”, I said that they and their concerns would end up being irrelevant as the Overton window continued to move. Trump used the term “civil war” in a tweet. (Thinly veiled threat.) Ann Coulter recently tweeted “the country needs to split up.” She has been going full beast mode (even more than usual) recently regarding immigration, saying, “continued immigration (including legal immigration) means we lose everything.” Glenn Beck recently talked about civil war (I don’t know what he said, someone told me about it.) Michael Savage too. Rush Limbaugh getting close to parroting our talking points on immigration. Bill O’Reilly said if the Left wins an election, “all our freedoms will be gone”. Once you understand humanity to the extent Propertarianism explains, it’s not hard to predict the broad strokes. (A key insight is understanding why the left & large segments of humanity cannot be reasoned with.) Edit
-
Right on Schedule. Like Clockwork
RIGHT ON SCHEDULE. LIKE CLOCKWORK How much more evidence d’ y’all need. I’m very good at what I do. Because I use data, demographics, and incentives, not wishful thinking. The worm turns… By the pricking of my thumbs, this way Revolution Comes!!! Note from me: After the (to me, rather amusing) initial reaction from a (from what I can tell, relatively small) group of people furiously counter-signaling any talk of “civil war”, I said that they and their concerns would end up being irrelevant as the Overton window continued to move. Trump used the term “civil war” in a tweet. (Thinly veiled threat.) Ann Coulter recently tweeted “the country needs to split up.” She has been going full beast mode (even more than usual) recently regarding immigration, saying, “continued immigration (including legal immigration) means we lose everything.” Glenn Beck recently talked about civil war (I don’t know what he said, someone told me about it.) Michael Savage too. Rush Limbaugh getting close to parroting our talking points on immigration. Bill O’Reilly said if the Left wins an election, “all our freedoms will be gone”. Once you understand humanity to the extent Propertarianism explains, it’s not hard to predict the broad strokes. (A key insight is understanding why the left & large segments of humanity cannot be reasoned with.) Edit
-
Progressivism = lying and undermining for the purpose of hyperconsumption – larg
Progressivism = lying and undermining for the purpose of hyperconsumption – largely of virtue signals.
-
Progressivism = lying and undermining for the purpose of hyperconsumption – larg
Progressivism = lying and undermining for the purpose of hyperconsumption – largely of virtue signals.
-
The Economics of Dating
THE ECONOMICS OF DATING AFAIK, both women and men want to obtain a premium, but a premium they can afford (not lose their investment); Women want to insure they attract the majority of attention in the relationship (are consumers of attention), or that through a relationship they increase their attention. Attention provides discounts on access to social opportunity – particularly for status signaling and verbal coercion. So, women seek an equilibrium under which they increase access to in-group social opportunity, have the resources to do so, but are able to control the source of resources, through control of attention. Men with money garner attention, put men in an advantageous position in relation to the woman, and increase women’s competition. Women want to buy with attention, words, and affection (low cost). Men want to buy with resources (high cost). The problem is women’s attention is scarce, and desirable, so it’s costly. There is nothing in psychology, sociology, ethics, politics, or group strategy that is not readily expressible in economic terms – emotions and intuitions are nothing more than evolution providing us with information on how to acquire some sort of resource discounting our costs. Any theory in metaphysics, psychology, sociology, ethics, politics, or group strategy must be constructable from rational incentives to acquire some sort of discount or premium, or the theory is false. It’s no different from any other of the logics: all logic is falsificationary. The principle problem facing the transformation of linguistic (metaphysical), psychological,social, legal, political, economic, and military disciplines is a failure to adopt the full accounting in those disciplines using economic equilibration = entropy in the physical sciences.