Norway: Female political fringe demands expand infinitely because their political preferences are just extensions of instinct for hyperconsumption of safety, virtue feelings, and virtue signals to others. That it’s unlimited is the evidence there is no reasoning behind it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-11 22:50:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326658464396021761
More on Brookings for their reputation of economic pseudoscience: density decreases opportunity costs, producing on average a 15% gain in consumption per doubling at the cost of crime, corruption, and dysgenia, with all capital increase to bureaucracy, rental and finance sectors.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-11 20:29:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326623038473981955
Reply addressees: @BrookingsInst
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326305896742445056
Dumb question because of dumb framing. Why do you think it’s securing oil for us? What is the american advantage (or the british before) of controlling world finance, law, and trade?
You wanna be as poor as europe? that’s how.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-10 17:00:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326208071589376002
Reply addressees: @KeyBumppp @SwordofGalaxios @PagliacciDorati
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326197619375353857
That is the dumbest argument of the day. And that’s saying something. Aside from geographic necessity,are you saying we won’t profit from trade with strategic enemies?Everyone does throughout all of history,it doesn’t change the fact that different groups are strategic enemies.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-10 16:59:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326207771981860865
Reply addressees: @CurlyTannie
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326199557647118336
You’re just not thinking it thru. What’s the capital investment necessary to make those inventions vs the technological (rather than industrial) innovations of the 20th? And no, the DOD created the internet. Even academic research is largely state-funded.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-10 14:49:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326175224031752193
Reply addressees: @judicialist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326172481829400576
Always. There’s no value in education for entrepreneurs. The purpose of education is to filter employees by conscientiousness. If we could conduct fitness, personality, and intelligence testing we wouldn’t need colleges. Other than a few engineering disciplines it’s worthless.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-10 14:24:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326168951542444034
Reply addressees: @Matt_Daniel_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326168429632610304
In fact, the primary purpose of education is to remove one from the risk, volatility, and stress of entrepreneurship – from labor to upper-middle class. “I want an education so I don’t have to work, I want to work for academy or state so I am not accountable either.” https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1326160741020348417
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-10 14:18:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326167273275596803
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1326160741020348417
Correct. But again, it’s a state failure, not a financial failure. The state has stopped functioning as the driver of competitive innovation because it’s been captured for redistribution. That change was suicidal. The military made American tech. British tech. Roman Tech.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-10 02:45:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325992904523984896
Reply addressees: @mchurchill22 @BlameMaxSand
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325991497087512577
Well, you know, you don’t ask them to give it up, you tell them. 😉 It eliminates the too big to fail problem by ensuring consumer liquidity is always possible. And forces bankers to seek productivity rather than ‘legal rent-seeking’, meaning more money to guys like you.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-10 02:35:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325990319876435969
Reply addressees: @mchurchill22 @BlameMaxSand
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325989366410448897
it’s cheap, it’s fast, can be targeted (say, for rent, food, utilities), and… if the state issues 1b in bonds, how much ends up in circulation, and where as credit money? And why is that beneficial vs just sending it directly to citizens?
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-10 02:28:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325988579823267840
Reply addressees: @mchurchill22 @BlameMaxSand
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325984915477901314