No thanks. I prefer meritocracy over seniority.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 23:00:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616571340848496645
Reply addressees: @Hope120297 @odannyboy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616569824372719616
Tech workers don’t need a union.
That’s ridiculous.
They are the most re-employable people we have in the shortest supply.
And it’s doubtful these are in fact ‘tech’ workers instead of clerical, customer relations, marketing, or sales.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 22:43:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616567149631242240
Reply addressees: @odannyboy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616463383804403715
I avoid that framing like the plague because there is no value in using it instead of the science independent of it, other than to reproduce the malincentives and counter-reaction of the original. All ideologies have some truth to them. I just decide what’s true and false.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 21:30:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616548731461013505
Reply addressees: @radiofreenw
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616547712350195712
Correct. “Preserve the child’s will to persevere” is a defensive means of preventing dependence(cost) while maintaining influence.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 20:42:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616536759650906112
Reply addressees: @TheMcMullan @StevePender
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616536302106857472
The economic advantage of asymmetry between (a) innovation converting more energy per capita, (b) the profitability of selling that advantage. (c) its capture in Malthusian reproduction (d) reversal or innovation as that consumption (e) the unvirtuous cycle that results.
2/4
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 16:04:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616466819325497344
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616466817366773762
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
RE: #Carlyle
Not everything is captured in prices, or brushing aside the Malthusian trap, and the momentum created by the sequential revolutions in agriculture to industry that created temporary disruptions before the gains of each revolution were more evenly distributed.
1/4
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1616466817366773762
RE: #Carlyle
Not everything is captured in prices, or brushing aside the Malthusian trap, and the momentum created by the sequential revolutions in agriculture to industry that created temporary disruptions before the gains of each revolution were more evenly distributed.
1/4
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 16:04:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616466817366773762
2/n To complete #Hayek we need to complete: a) Gary Becker’s economics of human behavior to include Hayekian Capital (Capital-in-toto, Demonstrated Human Interest) b) #Hoppe’s commensurability of property, c) Mises operationalism w/ Popper’s into constructive logic. #libertarian
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 15:27:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616457359886368769
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616457358334369792
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
1/n I don’t think #Hayek is overrated as a philosopher and economist, because I understand (and I continue) his intellectual project. And b/c I understand his extension of economics to include all capital whether informational, behavioral, institutional, or material.
#libertarian
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1616457358334369792
1/n I don’t think #Hayek is overrated as a philosopher and economist, because I understand (and I continue) his intellectual project. And b/c I understand his extension of economics to include all capital whether informational, behavioral, institutional, or material.
#libertarian
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 15:27:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616457358334369792
No. This is standard US strategy. They loan the money, maintain political leverage, then forgive the debt. They’ve already negotiated contracts for UA reconstruction. So it’s ‘political accounting’: to defend against corruption not to collect the money in the future.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 02:23:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615897599562727424
Reply addressees: @LvivTyler
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615711874494103552
That’s the issue tho. If it isn’t. It’s destructive. Because that means it’s a means of generating moral outrage because moral outrage is more certain to generate attention and altruistic punishment (abuse) than accomplish anything else.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 01:31:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615884562399170561
Reply addressees: @SumAeger
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615881473843777537