Theme: Governance

  • @POTUS: NO, THE SUPREME COURT WILL NEVER CHANGE ITS FUNCTION AND MISSION. The US

    @POTUS: NO, THE SUPREME COURT WILL NEVER CHANGE ITS FUNCTION AND MISSION.
    The USA is the only constitutional republic that ALSO has sovereignty of the people and the concurrency of the people by both regions and classes – and NOT the government.
    We are the only constitutional republic that prevents the people and the government from enacting harms against one another – because our common law, our constitution, our bill of rights, were derived from natural law – meaning the science of cooperation, meaning individual sovereignty.
    And the court exists to defend the constitution and the people, from not only the tyranny of the well meaning fools in government (You) but the tyranny of well meaning fools in the majority of the polity (the left).
    As such we are protected by ‘the natural law’, ‘the rights of englishmen’, ‘human rights’, and their codification in a constitution that allows us to overthrow you and replace you if you try to violate that law.
    The supreme court is reversing the democratic party’s and their leadership in the radical left’s attempt to circumvent the people, the natural law, the common law, the constitution, and the long history of western civilization to its founding principles discovered on the Steppe: the prohibition on authority by the distribution of sovereignty, reciprocity, contract, duty, excellence, truth, and beauty i to the distributed dictatorship of those demonstrating responsibility to insure those principles with one another.
    And there is no person living or dead that will defeat me in this argument.
    And if we must end this government as did our ancestors to prevent you from your crimes, we will do so with vigor, and sufficient demonstration, that no one will try again for a thousand years.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @POTUS


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-31 02:00:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818466683029221376

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818349589801443672

  • INSIGHT INTO CONSERVATIVE POLITICIANS UNDER UNIVERSAL ENFRANCHISEMENT –“It take

    INSIGHT INTO CONSERVATIVE POLITICIANS UNDER UNIVERSAL ENFRANCHISEMENT
    –“It takes agency to carry responsibility, as well as incentives that reward it. Conservatives demand responsibility without addressing either, making themselves useful idiots for the left.”– Martin Stepan…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-30 20:41:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818386365064814697

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @JacquesBroodryk @DieDagbreker We can eliminate ‘tax collecti

    RT @curtdoolittle: @JacquesBroodryk @DieDagbreker We can eliminate ‘tax collection’ as a duty of the Sheriff, because it’s divisive and we…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-30 13:54:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818284018628280469

  • We can eliminate ‘tax collection’ as a duty of the Sheriff, because it’s divisiv

    We can eliminate ‘tax collection’ as a duty of the Sheriff, because it’s divisive and we do not want Sheriffs to engage in divisive activity in support of the state rather than protection and leadership of the people when under duress.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-30 13:54:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818284001435554295

    Reply addressees: @JacquesBroodryk @DieDagbreker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818283426107285775

  • NO. WE DO NOT AND WILL NEVER LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY OF MOB RULE 1) We live in a Rep

    NO. WE DO NOT AND WILL NEVER LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY OF MOB RULE

    1) We live in a Republic under Rule of Law, and Rule of Law under the Natural Law, where we democratically elect representatives. We do not live in a democracy. Democracies always fail for the same reason: Power, Status, and Attention seeking (you and yours), and irresponsibility and incompetence (people who vote for you) create dependency which sponsors corruption and tyranny that brings nations to their end.

    2) If you try to further destroy The Republic, the Rule of Law, Rule of Law by the Natural Law (tort by Sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, excellence, truth), decided by the common law (commonality across classes and regions), and legislated by demand for concurrency (across classes and regions), in the defense of minority rights (those who demonstrate ability and responsibility for the self, family, business, and commons) or undermine their purpose in preserving our individual sovereignty in demonstrated interests (defense from those like you), then there are enough of us to easily bring this government down by force, reconstitute it with amendments, and legislation, and to restore those rights, obligations, inalienations, and prevent you and those like you from destroying the reason for the radical success of the west versus the rest: “the institutionalization in all walks of life of individual responsibility for personal private and common.” This alone is what makes high trust european civilization and it’s unique production of commons possible.

    And if we must replace this government, then we must do so such that no one again dares what you have dared for ten thousand years.

    I founded The Natural Law Institute for the purpose of protecting our people and our civilization and by externality mankind from the cancer of your petty, power-seeking, ignorance and arrogance.

    And I am but one man among millions who would gladly face the noose rather than suffer the consequences of ignorant, arrogant, well meaning fools.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @JoeBiden


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-30 00:12:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818077275348189184

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818048146238230704

  • If we shut down the online data stream back to 1999, or we shut down cable befor

    If we shut down the online data stream back to 1999, or we shut down cable before 1980’s 24 hour news, or we shut down cable television back to 1970, or we shut down television back to 1950, or radio back to 1920, or the telegraph back to 1860 (first international cable), or the newspaper back to 1605, or literacy back to 1450 … we could determine when the information stream became something that caused cognitive dissociation and the alienation that has resulted.
    That said if we merely set everything back to the McCarthy era and ended the migration o leftism to the states, and prevented the 1968 immigration act, and never tolerated no fault divorce or community property almost nothing that has happened would have.

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-29 23:50:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818071527876640768

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817771900791083427

  • I’m from Canandaigua, and we used to go camping with the Sheriff and his family.

    I’m from Canandaigua, and we used to go camping with the Sheriff and his family. 😉 But yes, the Sheriffs are largely working with the courts and the police departments have taken over most of the other duties.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-29 14:12:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817926100837679518

    Reply addressees: @words_of_a_King

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817925737732780518

  • Clarify ‘data privileges’? Do you to mean they have access to databases that cit

    Clarify ‘data privileges’? Do you to mean they have access to databases that citizens don’t? You’re correct that I didn’t list:
    “- Access to Information”
    But yes that is something they have access to that citizens don’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-29 13:50:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817920751594361048

    Reply addressees: @RussellJohnston

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817920158586884543

  • My experience with NY and WA sheriffs (reporting crimes) has been nothing but ex

    My experience with NY and WA sheriffs (reporting crimes) has been nothing but exceptional. IMO it’s because they’re elected and they are more of a fraternity than a pseudo-millitary organization.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-29 13:11:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817910742185570528

    Reply addressees: @words_of_a_King

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817910183248400437

  • SHERIFFS, DEPUTIES, POSSES, AND MILITIAS (From: “Shire(County) Reeves(Official)”

    SHERIFFS, DEPUTIES, POSSES, AND MILITIAS
    (From: “Shire(County) Reeves(Official)”)
    Sheriffs were created to:
    – Maintain law and order
    – Collect taxes (ouch)
    – Preside over the shire court
    – Organize local defenses

    Today:
    – Sheriffs can appoint deputies full time (if paid and budget permitting).
    – Sheriffs can temporarily deputize civilians in emergencies (posse comitatus) – paid or unpaid.
    – It’s relatively easy for sheriffs to appoint ‘reserve’ deputies (emergencies) – paid or unpaid.
    – And special deputies for specific tasks and time periods – paid or unpaid.
    – Sheriffs were originally able to organize a militia for the purpose of civil defense. And certainly in the case of emergencies. It is unfortunate that we have lost this local control to bureaucratic hierarchy.

    IMO we must constitutionally standardize the role of sheriffs as more powerful than that of police, as sheriffs (Shire-Reeves) are technically responsible for the people and to the people. In other words, the last linen of defense of the people from political abuses.

    Which is why they must be elected.

    Now, I’m trying to make a point here. It’s not that I’m unaware of state differences. 😉

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-29 13:05:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817909215039553536