The Adults in the Room, The People with a Plan. The Honest and Rational voice of Truth in a world of False Promise, and Deceit. For all conservatives, across the spectrum. For normies, for the center, and left of center, and even for the misguided children on the extreme left and right. Because the only enemy of all people is a domestic empire with too many people, too little integration, too many competing preferences, and too great a power distance between people and the government to bring their wants into being. That is a mainstream not “social media” message we can get the press to show up for. That is a message that will sell today – across the spectrum.
Theme: Governance
-
Positioning
The Adults in the Room, The People with a Plan. The Honest and Rational voice of Truth in a world of False Promise, and Deceit. For all conservatives, across the spectrum. For normies, for the center, and left of center, and even for the misguided children on the extreme left and right. Because the only enemy of all people is a domestic empire with too many people, too little integration, too many competing preferences, and too great a power distance between people and the government to bring their wants into being. That is a mainstream not “social media” message we can get the press to show up for. That is a message that will sell today – across the spectrum.
-
Proposed Roads to Freedom: Strategic Thinking
by Giego Caleiro
Facebook is the second worst place to post about this, after Twitter but here’s the issue: A lot posting related to politics is reactive only. We see something in the news and publically react to it. Yet the battles in politics are being won by smart French guys in the 60s and smart German/Austriac guys in the 30s and 40s who engineered the language changes that we currently see, leading to thing like the current attempt to change the meaning of the word racist to include people who think there are differences between the average member of different races, while keeping the negative connotation of the old and still true meaning “mistreating or willing to mistreat others on a racial basis, in particular favoring one’s own race over some other” On the RightWing, I see basically Curt having a project that is proactive, Propertarianism, and which could, in theory, become part of the discourse and progressively get some power to the point of actually guiding the discussion in a non reactive way in the next few decades. I see Pat Ryan who does seem to have a more hidden but still strategic process with actual flowcharts, aims etc… who is at least trying to implement it. I see also Thiel who doesn’t really think we can change politics too much, but only one or another opportunistic change. Bannon seems to truly have a plan and is helping many countries do it. Most people on Facebook though are just reacting. Showing how silly the squad or some liberal or some corporatist or some SJW is. That strategy won’t win. And judging by the changes in language, the other team is currently winning. So what are some more proactive ways to plan ahead how to actually make the world be this or that way a couple decades from now? It’s easy to know what not to do. Don’t say femicide, perpetuate, opressed, systemic, equity. Don’t concede anything on language. But having a specific well determined view of the future. What philosophers call a kind, is often helpful in bringing people into it. Thiel jokes that there’s three visual kind specific futures: 1) Islam: and women wear burkas 2) Environmentalism: electric scooters and Greta 3) Totalitarian surveillance: China style And between those he picks Greta. Fair enough. But it would be ideal if there were 2 things missing from conversation 4) Some other alternative that is more evolutionarily sustainable but still increases our odds of eventually seizing the astronomical value of the cosmic commons. and *) A strategy to disburse to people to cause us to get there, just like the left of 50 years ago took over academia, menial administrative positions, education, hollywood, and now uses that to control the youth and shift the language slowly and steady, until the Bildeberg Circle, trilateral commision, Davos etc… win and they can all farm everyone else to death. For those of us who think that’s a bad outcome, we need a strategy of our own. And the ones we have are somewhat incomplete stories that don’t encompass technology (like Christianity) and this reactive stance. We’re falling for the bait. We react to “the worst of the left” but we don’t create “the best of the non-left in an evolutionarily sustainable way that can slowly take over in the next few decades” But the future lies ahead, and a plan is needed. If possible one that can be decomposed into small parts like the SJW borg. There’s a huge army of rightwing people who just react. It would be nice if there was a plan besides imitating Tucker Carlson and making sarcastic remarks when the far left goes crazy.
-
Proposed Roads to Freedom: Strategic Thinking
by Giego Caleiro
Facebook is the second worst place to post about this, after Twitter but here’s the issue: A lot posting related to politics is reactive only. We see something in the news and publically react to it. Yet the battles in politics are being won by smart French guys in the 60s and smart German/Austriac guys in the 30s and 40s who engineered the language changes that we currently see, leading to thing like the current attempt to change the meaning of the word racist to include people who think there are differences between the average member of different races, while keeping the negative connotation of the old and still true meaning “mistreating or willing to mistreat others on a racial basis, in particular favoring one’s own race over some other” On the RightWing, I see basically Curt having a project that is proactive, Propertarianism, and which could, in theory, become part of the discourse and progressively get some power to the point of actually guiding the discussion in a non reactive way in the next few decades. I see Pat Ryan who does seem to have a more hidden but still strategic process with actual flowcharts, aims etc… who is at least trying to implement it. I see also Thiel who doesn’t really think we can change politics too much, but only one or another opportunistic change. Bannon seems to truly have a plan and is helping many countries do it. Most people on Facebook though are just reacting. Showing how silly the squad or some liberal or some corporatist or some SJW is. That strategy won’t win. And judging by the changes in language, the other team is currently winning. So what are some more proactive ways to plan ahead how to actually make the world be this or that way a couple decades from now? It’s easy to know what not to do. Don’t say femicide, perpetuate, opressed, systemic, equity. Don’t concede anything on language. But having a specific well determined view of the future. What philosophers call a kind, is often helpful in bringing people into it. Thiel jokes that there’s three visual kind specific futures: 1) Islam: and women wear burkas 2) Environmentalism: electric scooters and Greta 3) Totalitarian surveillance: China style And between those he picks Greta. Fair enough. But it would be ideal if there were 2 things missing from conversation 4) Some other alternative that is more evolutionarily sustainable but still increases our odds of eventually seizing the astronomical value of the cosmic commons. and *) A strategy to disburse to people to cause us to get there, just like the left of 50 years ago took over academia, menial administrative positions, education, hollywood, and now uses that to control the youth and shift the language slowly and steady, until the Bildeberg Circle, trilateral commision, Davos etc… win and they can all farm everyone else to death. For those of us who think that’s a bad outcome, we need a strategy of our own. And the ones we have are somewhat incomplete stories that don’t encompass technology (like Christianity) and this reactive stance. We’re falling for the bait. We react to “the worst of the left” but we don’t create “the best of the non-left in an evolutionarily sustainable way that can slowly take over in the next few decades” But the future lies ahead, and a plan is needed. If possible one that can be decomposed into small parts like the SJW borg. There’s a huge army of rightwing people who just react. It would be nice if there was a plan besides imitating Tucker Carlson and making sarcastic remarks when the far left goes crazy.
-
Clarity on Government
Clarity on Government https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/07/25/clarity-on-government/
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-25 18:08:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287087222362181633
-
Clarity on Government
—“Can you make your point crystal clear then? Amid excess verbiage, I have distilled out a set of arguments that 1) China’s form of government won the 20th century and 2) that form of government is Nazism and 3) is a desirable model to emulate”—AlcoholFrei15
Rome invented good Govt. China good bureaucratic. France restored it in National Socialism. Germany practiced it. Now China does. This form of government is the world-historical norm. Ideology separates bad from good. “Hurt” states practice hostile ideology. ‘Ideology makes bad’. Communism is impossible. capitalism is impossible. Mixed economy state capitalism is the historical and necessarily competitive norm. Rule of law or reciprocity with universal standing solves the problem of mixed economy state capitalism, by providing a market for policing it. That leaves the west facing the big lies: (a) preventing falsehood in discourse and undermining from within(truthful speech) (b) willingness to tolerate redistributive policy(ethnocentrism, homogeneity), and (c) preventing regression to the mean (eugenics). I don’t lie about it. We solve those problems. The only way to solve them and maintain the limited benefits of scale is (a) rule of law by strictly constructed rule of law (crosses all boundaries), (b) loose military federation, (c) of diverse states that customize their polities for their needs. And if we don’t we’ll have another bloody war that ends up with one brand of ideological left or right nazi or another. So how do we solve the problems of the present? No more lies. The Truth is Enough. Rule of Law of Reciprocity, Truthful Speech, and; Let 1000 Nations Bloom.
-
Clarity on Government
—“Can you make your point crystal clear then? Amid excess verbiage, I have distilled out a set of arguments that 1) China’s form of government won the 20th century and 2) that form of government is Nazism and 3) is a desirable model to emulate”—AlcoholFrei15
Rome invented good Govt. China good bureaucratic. France restored it in National Socialism. Germany practiced it. Now China does. This form of government is the world-historical norm. Ideology separates bad from good. “Hurt” states practice hostile ideology. ‘Ideology makes bad’. Communism is impossible. capitalism is impossible. Mixed economy state capitalism is the historical and necessarily competitive norm. Rule of law or reciprocity with universal standing solves the problem of mixed economy state capitalism, by providing a market for policing it. That leaves the west facing the big lies: (a) preventing falsehood in discourse and undermining from within(truthful speech) (b) willingness to tolerate redistributive policy(ethnocentrism, homogeneity), and (c) preventing regression to the mean (eugenics). I don’t lie about it. We solve those problems. The only way to solve them and maintain the limited benefits of scale is (a) rule of law by strictly constructed rule of law (crosses all boundaries), (b) loose military federation, (c) of diverse states that customize their polities for their needs. And if we don’t we’ll have another bloody war that ends up with one brand of ideological left or right nazi or another. So how do we solve the problems of the present? No more lies. The Truth is Enough. Rule of Law of Reciprocity, Truthful Speech, and; Let 1000 Nations Bloom.
-
Unite Behind Reforms Not Complaints
—“Curt, can you elaborate on what “man up, shut up, show up” means? What are the different forms that can take? You’ve previously described how in the Ukrainian revolution there those who fought, those who cooked, those who protected, those who supplied, those who marched, etc. What are the equivalent roles today? Also outside of the 100k men showing up.”—Moritz Bierling
Unite behind demands. Demands are the reforms, and nothing else. No nazi power symbols, white power symbols, no Christian symbols or demands, no hatred. Just be the adults in the room, and force discourse on policy and settlement on policy.
—“The thing that really irks me I guess about all the pissing and moaning from the Nazi and White Nationalist Right with regards to Propertarianism is that the system you propose for reforming the United States Curt creates not just one, but an entire series of de facto White/European-American nation states with the freedom to discriminate at their pleasure. You’re really onto something I think when you say that Propertarianism is an IQ test, cuz it’s not very hard at all to come to that conclusion. Non-Whites vote majority Left. Where do the majority of non-Whites live? In big urban areas. Who do we want to separate from? The Left. Where is the Left? In big urban areas, for the most part. Derp-dee derp-dee derp! It’s easy enough for a little kid to understand, really. You’d have to be high on your own farts not to be able to connect the dots.”—Nathan Borup
-
Unite Behind Reforms Not Complaints
—“Curt, can you elaborate on what “man up, shut up, show up” means? What are the different forms that can take? You’ve previously described how in the Ukrainian revolution there those who fought, those who cooked, those who protected, those who supplied, those who marched, etc. What are the equivalent roles today? Also outside of the 100k men showing up.”—Moritz Bierling
Unite behind demands. Demands are the reforms, and nothing else. No nazi power symbols, white power symbols, no Christian symbols or demands, no hatred. Just be the adults in the room, and force discourse on policy and settlement on policy.
—“The thing that really irks me I guess about all the pissing and moaning from the Nazi and White Nationalist Right with regards to Propertarianism is that the system you propose for reforming the United States Curt creates not just one, but an entire series of de facto White/European-American nation states with the freedom to discriminate at their pleasure. You’re really onto something I think when you say that Propertarianism is an IQ test, cuz it’s not very hard at all to come to that conclusion. Non-Whites vote majority Left. Where do the majority of non-Whites live? In big urban areas. Who do we want to separate from? The Left. Where is the Left? In big urban areas, for the most part. Derp-dee derp-dee derp! It’s easy enough for a little kid to understand, really. You’d have to be high on your own farts not to be able to connect the dots.”—Nathan Borup
-
YES THE RIGHT WILL LOSE IF WAR IS BROUGHT TO THEM —“Do you really think the ri
YES THE RIGHT WILL LOSE IF WAR IS BROUGHT TO THEM
—“Do you really think the right will lose?”–
The west Eurasians lost to raiding indo Europeans. The bronze age civs lost to raiding ‘sea peoples’. The ancient world civilizations lost to raiding Muslims. The Muslims lost to raiding Turks. The entire world lost to raiding Mongols. Everyone lost to the raiding Vikings. The indians lost to the raiding europeans. The British lost to raiding Americans. How much evidence do you need that raiders always win? Defense is just a way of losing faster. You don’t have to organize to defend your home. You can’t organize enough to defend a neighborhood or city. Mobility always wins, maneuver always wins, logistics always win. raiding always wins. Thats the history of the fall of civilizations: raiding.
I think the left will move fast and not stop because they have no other responsibilities other than to find excuses to kill and loot. I think conservatives will hole up and try to defend their homes in order to protect their personal investments and I think large numbers of roving leftists will take advantage of crushing the right one household or two at a time until the rest give up.
It will work. It’s how I would do it.
The only winning strategy is to siege the cities, cut the power, block all entrance and exit, until they eat their own. And that takes people showing up before it’s too late.
My strategy would work and prevent a war.
But the right is even dumber than the left.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-25 16:20:00 UTC