The Chimps (WN/NS) Can’t Be Led Until They Learn to Follow What Will Win – Rather than continue failing. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/07/29/the-chimps-wn-ns-cant-be-led-until-they-learn-to-follow-what-will-win-rather-than-continue-failing/
The Chimps (WN/NS) Can’t Be Led Until They Learn to Follow What Will Win
—“But hating our people – calling WN/NS chimps disqualifies you from leading them. Pretty simple.”–
[H]ate in this case is just the only expression the chimps (infants) understand. They can’t understand ‘adult’ yet. They haven’t been trained to understand human yet (adult).
The fallacy in that anyone is disqualified is that ANYONE can lead them. They don’t have leaders. They can’t have leaders that succeed, because what they want from a ‘leader’ is bad for them and has demonstrably caused them to lose for GENERATIONS.
The fact that there are 100 chimps (children) for every 1 human (adult), is why NO ONE CAN OR DOES lead them.
The fact that I want to live in a WN civ myself, under intolerant, rule of law, ethnocentric state capitalism that benefits the labor, working, and middle, their rates of reproduction, and the civilization that they are willing to defend; and that I want to, and daily work for it, does not require that I pander to chimps (children).
Instead it requires I keep trying to train and educate those chimps so that they learn to love what his good for them and will help them win.
And given that they are in the weak position, that means not expressing dominance taht the left uses to bait them into optics. Instead it’s (as we’ve done, and I will continue to do), love the enemy paternaly, like Gandhi, make the state the enemy instead, all while carrying the big promissory stick of arms.
And manning up, shutting up, showing up, doing the gandhi dance, and showing up in large enough numbers that we win.
Now how do we train the chimps(infants) not to chimp-out(act like the apes in 2001 A Space Oddysey, jumping up and down), and instead make them into a political movement?
How do we discipline them out of thinking they are powerful and scary, and need to be wooed and seduced by sexy manhood that they themselves lack, and make them man up, shut up, show up, love the oposition, so that we can defeat the enemy?
Antifa and BLM are just the opposition. The globalist, academic, financial, state order that prevents us from creating the states we want is the enemy.
I understand that. The Chimps don’t. So how are you going to help me educate the chimps (infants) into humans (adulthood)?
Because they are all victims of the sin of pride: unearned pride. vanity. Unworthy vanity. Cowardice masquerading as courage.
Man up, shut up, show up, disarm the enemy’s strategy, show up in mass, win.
The Chimps (WN/NS) Can’t Be Led Until They Learn to Follow What Will Win
—“But hating our people – calling WN/NS chimps disqualifies you from leading them. Pretty simple.”–
[H]ate in this case is just the only expression the chimps (infants) understand. They can’t understand ‘adult’ yet. They haven’t been trained to understand human yet (adult).
The fallacy in that anyone is disqualified is that ANYONE can lead them. They don’t have leaders. They can’t have leaders that succeed, because what they want from a ‘leader’ is bad for them and has demonstrably caused them to lose for GENERATIONS.
The fact that there are 100 chimps (children) for every 1 human (adult), is why NO ONE CAN OR DOES lead them.
The fact that I want to live in a WN civ myself, under intolerant, rule of law, ethnocentric state capitalism that benefits the labor, working, and middle, their rates of reproduction, and the civilization that they are willing to defend; and that I want to, and daily work for it, does not require that I pander to chimps (children).
Instead it requires I keep trying to train and educate those chimps so that they learn to love what his good for them and will help them win.
And given that they are in the weak position, that means not expressing dominance taht the left uses to bait them into optics. Instead it’s (as we’ve done, and I will continue to do), love the enemy paternaly, like Gandhi, make the state the enemy instead, all while carrying the big promissory stick of arms.
And manning up, shutting up, showing up, doing the gandhi dance, and showing up in large enough numbers that we win.
Now how do we train the chimps(infants) not to chimp-out(act like the apes in 2001 A Space Oddysey, jumping up and down), and instead make them into a political movement?
How do we discipline them out of thinking they are powerful and scary, and need to be wooed and seduced by sexy manhood that they themselves lack, and make them man up, shut up, show up, love the oposition, so that we can defeat the enemy?
Antifa and BLM are just the opposition. The globalist, academic, financial, state order that prevents us from creating the states we want is the enemy.
I understand that. The Chimps don’t. So how are you going to help me educate the chimps (infants) into humans (adulthood)?
Because they are all victims of the sin of pride: unearned pride. vanity. Unworthy vanity. Cowardice masquerading as courage.
Man up, shut up, show up, disarm the enemy’s strategy, show up in mass, win.
[A]ny form of Nationalism, including European Nationalism is only as important to me in so far as we produce the number of people necessary to fight for and preserve a civilization of small states each customized to the interests of our different demographics – whether that be Aristotelian(scientific), pagan(martial), Christian(empathic), and together we are federated under European traditional natural law of voluntary exchange and reciprocal insurance of one another.
In other words, I”m only interested in safety in numbers. Numbers who seek self determination by self determined means, and are willing to insure one another’s right to self determination by self determined means.
The difference is I’m willing to fight for everyone in that spectrum. Where the only thing we need trade is truth and reciprocity to have the market of polities that we want, in opposition to those civilizations that would DEPRIVE us of those markets of self-determination, by self-determined means.
Me? I’m cognitively anglo(Scandinavian), martial, pagan, individualist, and Aristotelian. I don’t want to live in under Christian superstition. I don’t want to live under martial despotism. I don’t want to live under some degree of communism we call social democracy.
I want to live under truth – correspondence with reality, reciprocity- mutually beneficial cooperation, markets – prosperity, and evolution – suppression of dysgenia, with truth, beauty, excellence, prosperity, and continuous evolution into the gods we imagine. And I want to love this universe, this earth and my ancestors for the opportunity to contribute to the transcendence of man.
I’m willing to fight for all of us to have self-determination by self-determined means, in a market for polities, federated by our wish to preserve our self-determination, by self-determined means, against the vast hordes of usurpers that would deprive us of our tri-functionalism: those of law and laws of nature, those of force and martial discipline, and those of faith and faithful submission.
And I’m willing to fight for the continuous sortition of our peoples into states that support those different means of self-determination.
I’m not however willing to live under rule of man and his frequent follies; nor under rule of priesthoods and superstition and their continuous follies; nor under the left and their reversal of everything true, reciprocal, and evolutionary.
So what separates my view of a solution, from the Christian, the WN, the NS, and the CIVNAT is that I’m willing to fight for YOUR choice of self-determination by self-determined means. IF you are willing to fight for mine. And to realize none of us can win otherwise.
Because the enemy doesn’t distinguish between our factions. They are not advocating FOR something. The enemy’s sole purpose is to exterminate us whether we are CIVNAT, NS, WN, Christian, Heathen-pagan, or Aristotelian.
And something near a third of our own are happy to side with the enemy. So ‘white nationalism’ doesn’t include separation from the third that are the enemy. And it doesn’t take advantage of the fact that separating from them will produce a dramatic leap in evolution only centuries of natural selection under adversarial circumstances could achieve.
They want us all gone. Even a third of our own want us gone.
So I proposed a solution for all of us. The restoration of the holy roman empire’s diversity of polities, with the most modern government that developed in Europe – the English rule of law: a market between polities, where self-determination by self-determined means is possible. But without the Roman, Holy Roman and British Tolerance for the enemy whether or not they are members of our tribes.
You can choose the solution I recommend, which continues our past traditions, and unites us in self-determination by self-determined means. Or you can continue to fail. Because the church cannot produce elites, the world will not tolerate NS despots or WN’s, the world will continue to defeat CIVNATS, and we will not tolerate each other.
Why? Because what we share is the intuition that we demand the right to self-determination by self-determined means. And to do that we require self-determined polities.
And only rule of law of natural law between polities producing markets for polities markets across polities and markets within polities preserves that right to self-determination by self-determined means.
This is, in the end, the message I have understood but have failed to communicate.
[A]ny form of Nationalism, including European Nationalism is only as important to me in so far as we produce the number of people necessary to fight for and preserve a civilization of small states each customized to the interests of our different demographics – whether that be Aristotelian(scientific), pagan(martial), Christian(empathic), and together we are federated under European traditional natural law of voluntary exchange and reciprocal insurance of one another.
In other words, I”m only interested in safety in numbers. Numbers who seek self determination by self determined means, and are willing to insure one another’s right to self determination by self determined means.
The difference is I’m willing to fight for everyone in that spectrum. Where the only thing we need trade is truth and reciprocity to have the market of polities that we want, in opposition to those civilizations that would DEPRIVE us of those markets of self-determination, by self-determined means.
Me? I’m cognitively anglo(Scandinavian), martial, pagan, individualist, and Aristotelian. I don’t want to live in under Christian superstition. I don’t want to live under martial despotism. I don’t want to live under some degree of communism we call social democracy.
I want to live under truth – correspondence with reality, reciprocity- mutually beneficial cooperation, markets – prosperity, and evolution – suppression of dysgenia, with truth, beauty, excellence, prosperity, and continuous evolution into the gods we imagine. And I want to love this universe, this earth and my ancestors for the opportunity to contribute to the transcendence of man.
I’m willing to fight for all of us to have self-determination by self-determined means, in a market for polities, federated by our wish to preserve our self-determination, by self-determined means, against the vast hordes of usurpers that would deprive us of our tri-functionalism: those of law and laws of nature, those of force and martial discipline, and those of faith and faithful submission.
And I’m willing to fight for the continuous sortition of our peoples into states that support those different means of self-determination.
I’m not however willing to live under rule of man and his frequent follies; nor under rule of priesthoods and superstition and their continuous follies; nor under the left and their reversal of everything true, reciprocal, and evolutionary.
So what separates my view of a solution, from the Christian, the WN, the NS, and the CIVNAT is that I’m willing to fight for YOUR choice of self-determination by self-determined means. IF you are willing to fight for mine. And to realize none of us can win otherwise.
Because the enemy doesn’t distinguish between our factions. They are not advocating FOR something. The enemy’s sole purpose is to exterminate us whether we are CIVNAT, NS, WN, Christian, Heathen-pagan, or Aristotelian.
And something near a third of our own are happy to side with the enemy. So ‘white nationalism’ doesn’t include separation from the third that are the enemy. And it doesn’t take advantage of the fact that separating from them will produce a dramatic leap in evolution only centuries of natural selection under adversarial circumstances could achieve.
They want us all gone. Even a third of our own want us gone.
So I proposed a solution for all of us. The restoration of the holy roman empire’s diversity of polities, with the most modern government that developed in Europe – the English rule of law: a market between polities, where self-determination by self-determined means is possible. But without the Roman, Holy Roman and British Tolerance for the enemy whether or not they are members of our tribes.
You can choose the solution I recommend, which continues our past traditions, and unites us in self-determination by self-determined means. Or you can continue to fail. Because the church cannot produce elites, the world will not tolerate NS despots or WN’s, the world will continue to defeat CIVNATS, and we will not tolerate each other.
Why? Because what we share is the intuition that we demand the right to self-determination by self-determined means. And to do that we require self-determined polities.
And only rule of law of natural law between polities producing markets for polities markets across polities and markets within polities preserves that right to self-determination by self-determined means.
This is, in the end, the message I have understood but have failed to communicate.