Theme: Governance

  • It’s just another vehicle for making arguments about me rather than my work.When

    It’s just another vehicle for making arguments about me rather than my work.When I’m already slumming because I made the mistake of trying to make a political force of the dissident “high disagreeables”.But even common interest can’t defeat primate dominance and disagreeableness.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-26 14:45:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309866792282738690

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11 @SammySc44817825

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309832866893791232

  • Quite the contrary. I just specialize in leftist lies.. Most corrupt family in p

    Quite the contrary. I just specialize in leftist lies.. Most corrupt family in politics.

    Reply addressees: @MerridelCrouch1 @HKrassenstein

  • Quite the contrary. I just specialize in leftist lies.. Most corrupt family in p

    Quite the contrary. I just specialize in leftist lies.. Most corrupt family in politics.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-25 00:38:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309291171265609729

    Reply addressees: @MerridelCrouch1 @HKrassenstein

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309226611317903369

  • Sorry. It doesn’t matter. You (the left) are the ones that started the ‘only pow

    Sorry. It doesn’t matter. You (the left) are the ones that started the ‘only power matters’ philosophy and destroyed our rule of law from within. When the alt-right copies you, and a president exercises discretion like you, and civil war results from you, it was you’re doing.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-24 16:45:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309172198817632257

    Reply addressees: @ReallyAmerican1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1308966424950517760

  • “Curt: If how are they able to run a nation (Israel) without imploding?”— How

    —“Curt: If how are they able to run a nation (Israel) without imploding?”—

    How long are the business cycle, the economic cycle, the generational cycle, the political cycle, the state cycle? Israel isn’t 100 years old yet. It’s heavily subsidized by the states. It’s militarily preserved by the states. At present the monarchies have more interest in ethnic alliance between jews and arabs than they have in ethnic alliance with Iran, since iran (ethnic persians), and Turkey (ethnic turks(mongolian) and iranics (kurds)) are the rising powers in the region, in opposition to the arabs and the north africans (proto-iranics). (The more I know about genetics the more I understaand the power of ethnocentrism and that civilzations and states are just expressions of ethnocentrism. And that empires are ethnocentric interests in producing trade.)

    So the question is, can they? How does Israel survive economically and strategically? How much longer will it survive demographically? The Arabs are just waiting them out.

    The only solution for Israel to survive is for all the world’s jews to move there, displace the Arabs, and it would be the Netherlands of the middle east, with about the same population density, same size economy, same extraordinary productivity, and from that position they could, like Rome, civilize the middle east – although through economics and imitation rather than war.

    Under that strategy, they can wait out Arab oil wealth. Islamists continue worldwide to reproduce faster than all other peoples, even if their rates of reproduction are lower. This is because Muslims reproduce and exist with the lowest capital (income) demands, the greatest substitution for family, socialization, and religious devotion for consumption.

    We don’t think of it that way but Islam is a very psychologically rewarding religion (addiction) because it is a very costly addiction. Think of it as Buddhism vs Xianity vs stoicism. How much time and how does each group spend self-regulating (in some ritual that produces mindfulness). Islam does the most with the least cognitive commitment and lowest adaptability cost.

    How much time does a protestant spend on competitive expression and materialism instead? How does a stoic do it? We all spend time somehow. We all spend our time somehow. All groups direct that time to something.

    Otherwise, the jews will continue to use the USA like they used Russia, and the pale, Spain, Germany, England, and Rome, and continue their bolshevik revolution here.

    I don’t see the Jewish identity as strong enough to form a nation when their group strategy is better satisfied by riding within and on host peoples.

    If for no other reason than they don’t produce enough people in the military caste (laboring and lower middle class) to create an army of at least 200K necessary to compete in the region.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-24 10:44:00 UTC

  • No. A modern government, capable of issuing its own currency, cannot go bankrupt

    No.

    A modern government, capable of issuing its own currency, cannot go bankrupt per se. It cannot be unable to pay its debts as long as the debts are denominated in the government’s currency.

    It can just pay off its DEBTES as a counterfeiter could.

    What the government CAN do is print and SPEND money and inflate its way into zero purchasing power.

    When people look at Venezuela or zimbabwe or most failed state economies, it’s because the government has spent the currency out of purchasing power. But there are a lot of ways to do that.

    This is more difficult in relatively autarkic countries (America, France) that consume their own production and import very little than it is for countries that depend on imports and exports because of insufficient local production and productivity.

    If you need imports and you spend your currency into low purchasing power, you might be able to get credit, or credit denominated in foreign currencies. And then you can go bankrupt on that debt. (ie: Greece).

    If you need imports (particularly energy), and you spend your currency into zero purchasing power, then you’re the equivalent of bankrupt. Not because you have no money to spend, but because the money you have to spend has no purchasing power (isn’t worth anything.)

    The problem European countries have, especially Italy, is that they can’t control their currencies so they can’t inflate away their debt by printing money. Occasional Inflating away debt (printing money to pay off debt) isn’t necessarily a bad thing because it takes time for such payments to work their way through the economy.

    Borrowing against yourself – meaning printing money you expect to collect later in taxes somehow, or otherwise, turn into some sort of returns on capital (like airports or railways our energy production), isn’t a bad thing either. What you want to avoid is systemically affecting the pricing structure so that finance, industry, business, and consumers alter their behavior (stop spending).

    What causes problems for all governments are ‘rents’ (privileges). Like.. you know, all those benefits we like to have. All those government salaries. …

    Why is this problem serious? Because there is no feedback loop, so the problem of market correction is extended into the government leading to ‘government correction’ – and that’s really, really, really, bad.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-22 20:36:00 UTC

  • —-”Q: Curt: Was communism ever a good idea in Russia?”—- (a) Russia practice Sta

    —-”Q: Curt: Was communism ever a good idea in Russia?”—-

    (a) Russia practice State Socialism, with a central economy, and it was never possible to achieve communism. (It never will be). And using the communist-to-socialist (platonic) frame of reference confuses the issue. Instead, Russia created a fully militarized State, and ran the country as **an industrial age military organization**.

    (b) A military doesn’t use the market process. It creates a command economy. It organizes to produce strategic goals. The benefit of a militarized society with a command economy, is that without a market process it does not need to pay market wages. Everyone has a ‘rank’ with prescribed benefits. In this sense, Russia took Napoleonic ‘total war’ to the extreme, as a permanent political, economic, social, and familial order. Her only mistake was in attempting to ideologically expand. She made the same mistake as Hitler: ideology over empiricism.

    (c) So the **benefit** of a military order over a market order is that the savings from not having to pay market wages (wages always consume profits), could be invested in the production of commons. It’s this massive production of commons that allowed Russia to modernize.

    (d) the **drawback** is i) the problem incentives, ii) the problem of economic calculation, iii) the problem of skill atrophy, iv) the problem of creating a market for corruption, v) the problem of creating a black market, vi) the (severe) externalites that are caused by policing the problem of incentives, economic calculation, skill atrophy, corruption, and black markets. Unfortunately, Soviets (Russians) did not know how to transition out of a military economy. Observing the consequences, the Chinese copied the americans instead of the Russians and used debt and cheap labor to indusrialize at the rest of the world’s expense just as america did to europe in the 1800’s.

    (e) **Consequences**: The russians have escapted the degredation of culture since the 1960’s brought about by the ewish postwar migration of insurgency from germany to america, and the conversion of the marxist program to the neo-marxist, postmodernist, anti-male feminist program (culminating in the 2020 attempt to repeat the Bolshevik revolution here in america using BLM/Antifa).

    The west may not survive the next few decades. Russia will – and she will very likely pick up the pieces ‘for cheap’.

    In retrospect, the Fascists created a corporate state, as defense against communists that created a military state. The British and Americans failed to grasp the seriousness of the threat of communism, as a repeat of the christian destructino of rome, and the muslim destruction of the ancient world. The Chinese are not christian and not idealistic: they have adopted fascism: intolerant, ethnocentric, state corporatism, and total war. But they have used credit (the anglo invention of scale finance) to achieve what the Soviets failed to, and in doing so demonstrated that the fascists were not unique, they were simply practicing the norm in history. And chinese in doing so have restored history to it’s regular state now that the european age of optimism is ended.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-22 19:40:00 UTC

  • “Q: Curt: Why is Russia not in the top 10 of the 2019 global competitiveness ind

    —“Q: Curt: Why is Russia not in the top 10 of the 2019 global competitiveness index?”—

    THE SOCIAL ANSWER

    Read the comment [on Quora] by Dima Vorobiev as it gives the Russian perspective – which isn’t wrong so to speak. In particular, it’s still a hierarchical rather than majority middle-class civilization. They don’t have the institutions of, or morals of, a rule of law people like northern Europeans – these are rules of a majority middle-class civilization. They don’t have a participatory government – that is a system of middle-class majority civilization. Northern Europeans developed rule of law because we developed a majority middle-class civilization (West Ukraine did – it was under Austrian rule, hence the division in Ukraine.). Russia only stopped serfdom in the late 19th century, never developed a middle class, and transitioned right into Bolshevism, Leninism, Soviet Communism. So, instead, as Dima states, they remain an aristocratic civilization, where there is an aristocratic political class, an aristocratic commercial class, and ‘the people’. My experience of life in Ukraine and Russia (which I prefer to America), that the people go about their civil and family work, the business class goes about its business, and the state goes about its business, and as such there is less conflict because everyone isn’t involved in everyone else’s business – which is a good thing since they don’t know enough to do so. (Unlike the presumption of Americans.) Russia had to bear the soviet era but has not fallen for western ‘decadence’ (destruction of the family, morals, civil life, and social responsibility). Family and civil life are still meaningful. And the only problem is the time it takes to create infrastructure and employment across eleven terribly cold time zones with only 140m people with an economy the size of Texas.

    THE ECONOMIC ANSWER:

    The correct answer is of course that the GCI is a political tool as much as an empirical one. Russia like China has been through the perils of the international system, which favors certain countries and not others.

    The principle answer is Time. They need more time to develop. Unreported in the west is Putin’s success at creating rule of law in Russia. Overreported in the west is the Russian use of Jingoism to inspire the people. If you view Russia from the lens of 1992 until today, it’s not as grand as china, but it’s pretty impressive.

    The second reason – which is just plain incomprehensible – is the decline the Russian workforce which is particularly suited to engineering and technology work (I prefer to hire them myself). This decline is due to declines in education and is in part due to the increase in (bad) entertainment. Seriously. Russians had the world’s best education system. And it needs it.

    The third reason is the condition of the financial sector, which is not sufficiently entrepreneurial (risk-tolerant). This is (in my opinion) the central problem. Until sanctions are lifted OR Russia succeeds in building a sufficiently trustworthy entrepreneurial credit sector, it will be difficult to get the 1/3 of the population who still lives in ‘rustic’ conditions, out of them.

    The fourth reason is the low trust society and its impact on rule of law. I tried to buy about a dozen tech companies in Russia rather than start one and it’s impossible to determine what’s true; difficult to trust a contract will hold; So relationships matter and always will. Russia is just like Americans except they trust the government 1000x less, and friends and family 1000x more.

    In other words, Russians wouldn’t take this report very seriously. It just feeds into the hands of the same people who spent the past 70 years putting us in the current precarious position.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-22 18:07:00 UTC

  • The Solution to The Great Sort of The 21 St Century?

    The Solution to The Great Sort of The 21 St Century? https://t.co/JLsgo3tsCO

  • The Solution to The Great Sort of The 21 St Century?

    The Solution to The Great Sort of The 21 St Century? https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/09/20/the-solution-to-the-great-sort-of-the-21-st-century/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-20 01:51:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307497553815121927