Theme: Governance

  • The Course of Any Revolutionary Victory

    The Constitution was designed as a political organization for an alliance of traditional Germanic micro-states under traditional European natural law. The Bill of Rights was added to enumerate specific limitations on the state. But this enabled the lie: ‘Rights’ over Natural Law. Constitutional Rights were testable, and Natural Law was insufficiently articulated outside of Blackstone, Smith, Locke, and Hobbes. Like the common law, it was ASSUMED not stated. This opened the door to positive law (command) that violated Natural Law and the Common Law. Between the failure to articulate the natural law logic, and common law method, as the SCIENCE OF COOPERATION, then enumerating a subset of rights, then combining classical liberalism’s positive inspirations,with Jewish postwar Sophistry(Pilpul) Undermining(Critique), it ‘broke’. It’s entirely possible – because I’ve (we have) done it – to restore the constitution and reverse the incremental destruction of our civilization by a long stream of sophomoric and pseudoscientific attacks on our western SCIENTIFIC traditions of cooperation and government. And strategically speaking, it’s a very different thing to revolt – sue the state by a common law declaration of reformation or secession – in order to restore the constitution, and overthrow more than a century of pseudoscience sophistry and deceit, than any other justification. So if you want rebellion, violence, religious rule, authoritarian rule – you’re asking for ‘feels’ not ‘reals’. You’re as bad as the left and women. If you have a brain, and you want victory, you have to choose ‘reals’ over ‘feels’. The Law, defended by a court, sherrifs, militia and an army is the only interpersonal, social, political, economic, and strategic operating system that does not require the people to share the same abilities, intuitions, feelings, experience, knowledge, and skill. Law is the solution: always. Not because it is best. But because it is the only solution possible. But to make and enforce law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedure a people need the POWER to do so. That power must come from a combination of the force necessary to replace an evil state, AND solutions that for the majority are preferable to status quo. So any revolution victory requires the satisfaction not of the extremes but of the center. The extremes will take action for ANY improvement, the center will simply not RESIST a substantial improvement. And we are able to provide a substantial improvement for the majority middle. Revolution Comes.

  • The Course of Any Revolutionary Victory

    The Constitution was designed as a political organization for an alliance of traditional Germanic micro-states under traditional European natural law. The Bill of Rights was added to enumerate specific limitations on the state. But this enabled the lie: ‘Rights’ over Natural Law. Constitutional Rights were testable, and Natural Law was insufficiently articulated outside of Blackstone, Smith, Locke, and Hobbes. Like the common law, it was ASSUMED not stated. This opened the door to positive law (command) that violated Natural Law and the Common Law. Between the failure to articulate the natural law logic, and common law method, as the SCIENCE OF COOPERATION, then enumerating a subset of rights, then combining classical liberalism’s positive inspirations,with Jewish postwar Sophistry(Pilpul) Undermining(Critique), it ‘broke’. It’s entirely possible – because I’ve (we have) done it – to restore the constitution and reverse the incremental destruction of our civilization by a long stream of sophomoric and pseudoscientific attacks on our western SCIENTIFIC traditions of cooperation and government. And strategically speaking, it’s a very different thing to revolt – sue the state by a common law declaration of reformation or secession – in order to restore the constitution, and overthrow more than a century of pseudoscience sophistry and deceit, than any other justification. So if you want rebellion, violence, religious rule, authoritarian rule – you’re asking for ‘feels’ not ‘reals’. You’re as bad as the left and women. If you have a brain, and you want victory, you have to choose ‘reals’ over ‘feels’. The Law, defended by a court, sherrifs, militia and an army is the only interpersonal, social, political, economic, and strategic operating system that does not require the people to share the same abilities, intuitions, feelings, experience, knowledge, and skill. Law is the solution: always. Not because it is best. But because it is the only solution possible. But to make and enforce law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedure a people need the POWER to do so. That power must come from a combination of the force necessary to replace an evil state, AND solutions that for the majority are preferable to status quo. So any revolution victory requires the satisfaction not of the extremes but of the center. The extremes will take action for ANY improvement, the center will simply not RESIST a substantial improvement. And we are able to provide a substantial improvement for the majority middle. Revolution Comes.

  • (So we are seeing them give up on factionalism. The question is whether once tha

    (So we are seeing them give up on factionalism. The question is whether once that’s happened, it’s finally possible to unite them behind a viable political solution)


    Source date (UTC): 2021-07-22 14:28:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1418216413265866752

    Reply addressees: @Scott_Throne

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1418215356083101696

  • IMO(the strategy I have taken) the social media alt-right phenomenon and the Tru

    IMO(the strategy I have taken) the social media alt-right phenomenon and the Trump era(both squashed) produced overconfidence in the potential of each faction (religious, civic, ethno-authoritarian) and they have to ‘give up’ on those strategies in order to ‘grow up’ and win.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-07-22 14:27:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1418216220667621376

    Reply addressees: @Scott_Throne

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1418215356083101696

  • So any revolution victory requires the satisfaction not of the extremes but of t

    So any revolution victory requires the satisfaction not of the extremes but of the center. The extremes will take action for ANY improvement, the center will simply not RESIST a substantial improvement. And we are able to provide a substantial improvement for the majority middle. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1418208799161257984

  • But to make and enforce law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and

    But to make and enforce law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedure a people need the POWER to do so. That power must come from a combination of the force necessary to replace an evil state, AND solutions that for the majority are preferable to status quo. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1418208336563130368

  • no it’s because the extremists were ahead of the window AND so fking infantile t

    no it’s because the extremists were ahead of the window AND so fking infantile that the public felt even the radical left was preferable to the radical right.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-07-21 03:04:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1417681840891179012

    Reply addressees: @Reciproperty @LukeWeinhagen @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1417650953885470724

  • There was nothing we could do but wait until the fail armies of faith and fascis

    There was nothing we could do but wait until the fail armies of faith and fascism failed thoroughly enough to want an adult solution, and the Overton window moved over the ‘normal’ people who want one also – which is happening.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-07-21 00:39:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1417645353940262912

    Reply addressees: @Reciproperty @Ozpin_88 @LukeWeinhagen @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1417638231697502214

  • I mean, the Holy Roman Empire (of the Germanic People) wasn’t holy, roman, or mu

    I mean, the Holy Roman Empire (of the Germanic People) wasn’t holy, roman, or much of an empire. It was a federation of micro states, which is the optimum political order. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1417540456414580740

  • @sourpatchlyds 5. With the advent of the middle-class seizure of government, we

    @sourpatchlyds
    5. With the advent of the middle-class seizure of government, we replaced the constant diligence against the violation of our law by the ‘divine right of kings’ with the same problem by ‘the legitimacy of democratic government’. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1417562229671616513