Theme: Governance

  • No, the court is returning the decision to the States, because the court (correc

    No, the court is returning the decision to the States, because the court (correctly) believes that the RvW decision politicized the courts by depriving the states of making a decision over punishments for killings rather than the state protecting a universal right.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-22 23:55:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451698797894115337

    Reply addressees: @SenJeffMerkley

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451644574141763593

  • Kathy: The Court is seeking a reason to restore abortion to the States, and to r

    Kathy: The Court is seeking a reason to restore abortion to the States, and to remove that responsibility from the Supreme Court, as they ‘believe’ it was an overreach that delegitimized, and politicized, the court when it’s the only remaining legitimate institution.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-22 23:54:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451698450626760710

    Reply addressees: @GovKathyHochul

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451623077729742851

  • The court needs an excuse to throw abortion back to the individual States, becau

    The court needs an excuse to throw abortion back to the individual States, because in the court’s self-analysis the RvW abortion ruling delegitimized the court, and the court is concerned that it is the only branch of government that retains a semblance of legitimacy.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-22 23:01:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451685279446806539

    Reply addressees: @NDLaw @sherifgirgis @washingtonpost

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451631047138021379

  • EXACTLY –“Putin compares the battle for equal rights in Western countries to Bo

    EXACTLY
    –“Putin compares the battle for equal rights in Western countries to Bolshevik dogmatism on the brink of absurdity and pleads for “rational conservatism”– Putin at the Valdai Forum.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-22 22:52:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451682958046371844

  • Well done Ryan. Just FWIW: This is an excellent example of the consequence of th

    Well done Ryan.
    Just FWIW: This is an excellent example of the consequence of the ‘demilitarization’, (which can rapidly respond with men and equipment outside of economic constraints) into bureaucracies that can’t. See the failures of Borders, Disasters, Disease, now Trade.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-22 21:33:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451663130992447492

    Reply addressees: @typesfast

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451545533928157186

  • The USA has more miles of navigable waterways with access to farmland than the r

    The USA has more miles of navigable waterways with access to farmland than the rest of the world combined. This is why ‘conservatives’ must control the center.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-22 03:54:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451396587608023053

  • Can you imagine a president of the USA that could deliver as meaningful a speech

    Can you imagine a president of the USA that could deliver as meaningful a speech as Putin did today? (a) absolutely impossible for anyone that competent to get elected (b) impossible to stay in office long enough to develop competency, (c) and Americans lack the attention span.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-21 23:51:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451335263179972610

  • POPULATION COMPARISON The Optimum Size: Denmark 6M Sweden 10M Norway 5.5M Finlan

    POPULATION COMPARISON
    The Optimum Size:
    Denmark 6M
    Sweden 10M
    Norway 5.5M
    Finland 5.5M

    UK 68M: Eng. 55M, Wales 3M, Scotland 5.4M, N.I. 1.8M
    Netherlands 17M
    Germany 85M
    Austria 9M
    Switzerland 8.7M

    CITIES
    Moscow 12M
    Paris 11M
    London 9M
    LA 12M, NY 18M
    Tokyo 37M
    Beijing 21M


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-21 22:34:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451316058254684178

  • Understand Incentives: Conservative Paranoia In Public Speech, Because of The FBI and Police State

    Our People overthink these things. The FBI is looking for people who are showing signs of mental instability and signaling individual or group potential for violence. They’ve asked me to be careful what I say, precisely because of the number of mentally unstable young men out there in the current generations, who are easily influenced. They are biased against the right because we are constraining state power, in an era where (beginning with Clinton and Obama) the state became aware that the probability of civil war because of heterogeneity would rapidly increase, especially after the 1992 tipping point (which most of you won’t remember was ‘a thing’.) The right is an existential threat to the state actors, as well as the financial sector, and the globalist financial sector, and the globalist movement that is just a reformation of communist authoritarianism, which was just a secular pseudoscientific reformation of the authoritarian monotheistic supernatural religions. So don’t posture with macho and bravado about violence or crime, but frame all your actions as political, not violent or criminal. If you review the leaked information on federal communications monitoring, almost all of it is an attempt to discover Islamic terrorists transferring money, organizing, or planning some actions. I don’t have knowledge of post-jan6th changes, and the information they’re extracting from FB/Google etc hasn’t leaked enough that we know what’s happening there versus through the telcos (I have knowledge of those technologies and techniques). The inequality of protection under the law between left and right was pretty obvious in the licensing of Globalist-Soros-Antifa-BLM terrorism, and the prosecution of the right’s opposition to their terrorism. The treatment of jan6th as some conspiracy theory rather than a protest that as one percent of the severity of any of the left protests during the sixties is demonstrated evidence of the government’s intention to eradicate the right, rule of law, the constitution, Christianity, the American experiment in a majority middle class meritocracy, and the whole of anglo, germanic, and broader European civilization. We have a political case. But we also have both separatist, secessionist, and repetitions of the founder’s common-law suit against the state that created the USA as options., Its only once those are exhausted we must resort to force. Because it is only once we have exhausted those options that we hold the moral high ground. Why? Because we are fighting over the right to self-determination. And the only reciprocity (morality) possible is the reciprocal exchange of that right to self-determination by self-determined means. And that requires we produce separate territories, polities, and governments.

  • Understand Incentives: Conservative Paranoia In Public Speech, Because of The FBI and Police State

    Our People overthink these things. The FBI is looking for people who are showing signs of mental instability and signaling individual or group potential for violence. They’ve asked me to be careful what I say, precisely because of the number of mentally unstable young men out there in the current generations, who are easily influenced. They are biased against the right because we are constraining state power, in an era where (beginning with Clinton and Obama) the state became aware that the probability of civil war because of heterogeneity would rapidly increase, especially after the 1992 tipping point (which most of you won’t remember was ‘a thing’.) The right is an existential threat to the state actors, as well as the financial sector, and the globalist financial sector, and the globalist movement that is just a reformation of communist authoritarianism, which was just a secular pseudoscientific reformation of the authoritarian monotheistic supernatural religions. So don’t posture with macho and bravado about violence or crime, but frame all your actions as political, not violent or criminal. If you review the leaked information on federal communications monitoring, almost all of it is an attempt to discover Islamic terrorists transferring money, organizing, or planning some actions. I don’t have knowledge of post-jan6th changes, and the information they’re extracting from FB/Google etc hasn’t leaked enough that we know what’s happening there versus through the telcos (I have knowledge of those technologies and techniques). The inequality of protection under the law between left and right was pretty obvious in the licensing of Globalist-Soros-Antifa-BLM terrorism, and the prosecution of the right’s opposition to their terrorism. The treatment of jan6th as some conspiracy theory rather than a protest that as one percent of the severity of any of the left protests during the sixties is demonstrated evidence of the government’s intention to eradicate the right, rule of law, the constitution, Christianity, the American experiment in a majority middle class meritocracy, and the whole of anglo, germanic, and broader European civilization. We have a political case. But we also have both separatist, secessionist, and repetitions of the founder’s common-law suit against the state that created the USA as options., Its only once those are exhausted we must resort to force. Because it is only once we have exhausted those options that we hold the moral high ground. Why? Because we are fighting over the right to self-determination. And the only reciprocity (morality) possible is the reciprocal exchange of that right to self-determination by self-determined means. And that requires we produce separate territories, polities, and governments.