@Tayai They dont’ matter as other than a criticism of the legitimacy of the chinese model.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 23:44:41 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107663109751791671
Theme: Governance
-
@pc_PHAGE Good alternative narrative. Well done. Point is that the USA cannot mt
@pc_PHAGE Good alternative narrative. Well done. Point is that the USA cannot mtaintain world stability, and not maintain world finance, trade routes, and trade. As such we will ahve a reorganization of some kind that usually ends in large scale warfare.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 23:42:28 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107663101033207947
-
The govt has a long record of tech failure. We can either beat others to market
The govt has a long record of tech failure. We can either beat others to market or not.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 23:38:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1484671780128272387
Reply addressees: @BasedLawyer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1484666248130662401
-
CURT: Q: Potential World War 3!? Not immediately. Over time. Russia->Ukraine 1st
CURT: Q: Potential World War 3!?
Not immediately. Over time.
Russia->Ukraine 1st, China->Taiwan 2nd, Iran-NE saudi oil fields 3rd. Turkey->Greek Islands 4th. Instantaneous end of postwar era and european dominance in world evolutionary direction. France has opportunity to militarily take over europe. America must retreat to its hemisphere. China expands to the sea of japan. Gets aggressive with india. Pakistan and China aggress against india. Russia defensively moves to divide khazakstan north russian south turkic. North Korea ->South Korea.
Somewhere in there someone lets loose nukes, eliminating the taboo, and then fucking chaos.
To take out the entire USA requires nothing but a few air bursts to wipe out electricity and electronics. The only thing left is subs and radio. The chinese and russians let loose with anti-sattelite weapons. Something on the order of a third of the planet dies from collapse of world security finance and trade and resulting disease, starvation, uprising and war.
Very fragile world we built here…
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 17:42:30 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661685602350847
-
2) Like I’ve been saying for a decade now: the money in crypto is provisioning t
2) Like I’ve been saying for a decade now: the money in crypto is provisioning tech to governments the way Blackrock and Visa provision tech for the state. They will outlaw by closing in and out doorways all competing digital coins, and will convert all to Fedcoin as I predicted.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 17:21:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1484576999859445761
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1484576998211084289
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
1) Y’all can hate me for this but as I said, crypto is simply free offbook research and development for the state that will impose even more economic intervention using Fedcoins. Thursday the Fed asked for input on Fedcoin. Today Russia bans crypto. This is just the beginning.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1484576998211084289
-
1) Y’all can hate me for this but as I said, crypto is simply free offbook resea
1) Y’all can hate me for this but as I said, crypto is simply free offbook research and development for the state that will impose even more economic intervention using Fedcoins. Thursday the Fed asked for input on Fedcoin. Today Russia bans crypto. This is just the beginning.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 17:21:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1484576998211084289
-
FROM: Helikzhan @curtd We continue as we have. 1. Informing 2. Boycotting 3. Wit
FROM: Helikzhan
@curtd We continue as we have.1. Informing
2. Boycotting
3. Withdrawing from their orgs
4. Reorganizing under our own banners, economy and culture.
5. Providing the existential threat to their survival by simply not engaging with it.RESPONSE BY:
Curt Doolittle (PRO) @curtd Original Gabber@Helikzhan All of those strategies have however consistently failed over the past century and a half, because they are entirely passive – we lack teh monarchy and universal military as means of organizational defense against the female means of social destruction of knowledge, tradition, and institutions. What you’re suggesting is a repetition of the libertarian fantasy that incremental separation is possible. It’s not. Libertarians are always wrong. Just as much as marxists are always wrong. For the same reason. There is no means of voluntary separation from kelptoparasites who depend on that parasitism and absence of competition.
1) The first existential threat to the enemy is forcible political separation, or forcibile political domination. Separation is superior becuase it eliminates the cost of spending the next 1000 years genetically pacifying their instinct for feminine kleptoparasitism. We simply separate, restore our evolutionary velocity and high trust by restoring society-as-army, under rule of law, and family as the purpose of policy, and leave them behind. There is no downside to this strategy because it takes the moral high ground.
2) The second existential threat is conquest and rule – which honestly is something we don’t want. Let them suicide into favellas. The problem with this strategy is that it makes the entire planet fear you and boycott you.
3) The third existential threat is one we find morally reprehensible – which is the even higher cost of deportation, displacement, or elimination. The problem with this method is that it makes the entire planet war with you.
Those are our choices. They are the only choices. Everything else is wet-dreams of adolescent boys afraid to pay the high cost of obtaining their sovereignty by the only means sovereignty is ever produced: the organized application of violence we call an ‘army’.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 16:54:11 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661495572644959
-
@Helikzhan All of those strategies have however consistently failed over the pas
@Helikzhan All of those strategies have however consistently failed over the past century and a half, because they are entirely passive – we lack teh monarchy and universal military as means of organizational defense against the female means of social destruction of knowledge, tradition, and institutions. What you’re suggesting is a repetition of the libertarian fantasy that incremental separation is possible. It’s not. Libertarians are always wrong. Just as much as marxists are always wrong. For the same reason. There is no means of voluntary separation from kelptoparasites who depend on that parasitism and absence of competition.
The first existential threat to the enemy is forcible political separation, or forcibile political domination. Separation is superior becuase it eliminates the cost of spending the next 1000 years genetically pacifying their instinct for feminine kleptoparasitism. We simply separate, restore our evolutionary velocity and high trust by restoring society-as-army, under rule of law, and family as the purpose of policy, and leave them behind. There is no downside to this strategy because it takes the moral high ground.
The second existential threat is conquest and rule – which honestly is something we don’t want. Let them suicide into favellas. The problem with this strategy is that it makes the entire planet fear you and boycott you.
The third existential threat is one we find morally reprehensible – which is the even higher cost of deportation, displacement, or elimination. The problem with this method is that it makes the entire planet war with you.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 16:51:42 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661485843813618
-
@RadioFreeNorthwest I don’t disagree with Doug on anything. I just have a differ
@RadioFreeNorthwest I don’t disagree with Doug on anything. I just have a different specialization and so different emphasis, interests, and responsibilities: I have to create a government that can operate in modernity and into the future that protects us in perpetuity. I want to solve the problem of the enemy’s strategy and tactics – even if our own people try to use them. Doug is also my friend and I consider him one of the only viable leaders on the right.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-20 19:51:06 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107656528938178748
-
RT @ContraFabianist: @curtdoolittle Values are intermediate capital… The probl
RT @ContraFabianist: @curtdoolittle Values are intermediate capital… The problem with civic nationalism is that it intuits a need to defe…
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-20 19:41:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1484249855954505739