Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 23:30:58 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107719678898706144
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 23:30:58 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107719678898706144
THUCYDIDES TRAP AND WAR WITH CHINA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXDQQxpkpZk
IMO: war is profitable industry when for profit not policing. War provides opportunity for restoration (counter-revolution against woke).
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 21:29:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488263314933174273
Play on words. Does the supreme court lead, or does it decide when the vast hierarchy of processes of leadership fail? Does the king decide? Or resolve conflicts when leaders fail? Does the Emperor decide or choose the generals when leaders fail? 😉
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 21:15:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488259782507122688
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488257652882817030
YOu missed not much other than as Hoppe explained the answer is that the optimum decider of last resort is the monarchy(owners) not parliament (renters). And that there is a difference between ‘war – or – catching up’ and ‘peace – or – going concern’.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 20:58:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488255333516595205
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488254784717082627
In the end, constitution and law are the operating system for state, government, economy, society and everything else is gaming it. 😉
I have no interest in normies. You can’t make the horse drink, or the pig sing.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 20:34:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488249450472644611
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488248717824212992
Yet, as I explained in my last two videos (30th and 31st) there is a natural desire for monopoly (what you’re suggesting) when the success of our people was we’re the only ones to preserve trifunctional markets, and the evolutionary velocity and prosperity that it makes possible.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 19:46:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488237210994368513
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488236831573487621
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Imperius__13 In other words, a competency spectrum from child, to mother, to ascendant male, to established male – decision hierarchy given age, ability, knoweldge, experience, AND empathy(near) vs systematizing (far). We need religion(empathy) > philosophy(choice) > law(decidability) for it.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1488236831573487621
Well again, you’re definitely germanic (psychological) and I’m definitely anglo (empirical) and others are definitely empathic (emotional) so the problem is what combination of law, institutions, and religion produce coherence across that spectrum?
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 19:12:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488228726882119685
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488228215386689542
There is every reason and every opportunity for him to act. AFAIK he is baiting us into action so that he can blame us for his aggression. His only gamble is the will of average Ukrainians to force him into years of house-to-house urban combat and european military escalation.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 19:08:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488227609225924608
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @semper_vincit
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488225792450613256
I am still looking for a reason for him not to invade. This window of opportunity, esp if coordinated with China and possibly Iran, will end not only US dominance, but European dominance, our status, political influence, social influence, and economic privilege.
I would do it.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 19:04:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488226634914222081
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @semper_vincit
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488225792450613256
Well I don’t think that makes the sense you think it does, because it wasnt possible. But prevention of another world war was at least possible. And so we’re back to Federations vs Empires, and it will end globalization, but also our internal globalists.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 15:36:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488174309562589184
Reply addressees: @Seanrothmans @Imadancer821
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488171112576000001