Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • Can other civilizations abandon state and religious authoritarianism and develop

    Can other civilizations abandon state and religious authoritarianism and develop sufficient trust to govern by rule of law of natural law (science)? The ME, India, the Arab Monarchies, and EU need federations, but russia, china want leninism, and iran wants a leninist caliphate.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-05 00:11:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1489753599743774720

    Reply addressees: @hazbeenthere @elbanna101 @mklixi

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1489752742641995780

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @hazbeenthere @elbanna101 @mklixi So I would say we still have the best model for an IQ 105+ civilization, if we can replace the new jewish neo-marxist-woke religion with some sort of secular humanism, and restore education. But It’s very difficult to defeat rule of law by natural law.
    If not we die.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1489752742641995780

  • @Drdru52 Well done brother. Good positive leadership. My disagreement would be t

    @Drdru52 Well done brother. Good positive leadership. My disagreement would be that (a) the truth is not something they want to hear, (b) there are too many yeeters and morons that want to maintain their attention and clicks from the losers and will undermine it (c) the losers will always find something to whine about so that they can continue to sit at home and whine and not show up and do the work and pay the cost of their freedom.

    That’s the evidence. I know. We spend a year and a half. Anyone popular today on the internet for the right is probably if not certainly a cancer for the right’s objectives.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-04 21:50:16 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107741932162462596

  • THE PROBLEM OF BEING AHEAD OF THE REVOLUTIONARY CURVE The problem we have faced

    THE PROBLEM OF BEING AHEAD OF THE REVOLUTIONARY CURVE

    The problem we have faced by being ahead of the curve, is that the overton window – meaning the willingess of people to hear, to recognize what is heard, to adapt to what is heard, to desire to bring about what is heard, to be willing to act upon what is heard, to act when it is convenient, to act when it is imperative, or to act out of desperation as a last resort – doesn’t move across people equally, nor across the population as a whole equally.

    We are incrementally closing on the peak intersection of the factors that cause people to act within that window. I specialize in macro predictions and I can only get it within five to ten years. No one can predict the exact window’s timing. We can only attempt to seize every opportunity to capture that window as it comes along.

    As such ‘morons’ think that trying to organize early is possible. It isn’t. It will only capture dysfunctionals. What you try with any movement is to leave behind dysfunctinoals in order to capture the normies that make political victory desirable for enough people of good character that they will act in concert.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-04 20:45:32 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107741677628330697

  • @Nature_and_Race The problem we have faced by being ahead of the curve, is that

    @Nature_and_Race The problem we have faced by being ahead of the curve, is that the overton window – meaning the willingess of people to hear, to recognize what is heard, to adapt to what is heard, to desire to bring about what is heard, to be willing to act upon what is heard, to act when it is convenient, to act when it is imperative, or to act out of desperation as a last resort – doesn’t move across people equally, nor across the population as a whole equally. We are incrementally closing on the peak intersection of the factors that cause people to act within that window. I specialize in macro predictions and I can only get it within five to ten years. No one can predict the exact window’s timing. We can only attempt to seize every opportunity to capture that window as it comes along. As such ‘morons’ think that trying to organize early is possible. It isn’t. It will only capture dysfunctionals. What you try with any movement is to leave behind dysfunctinoals in order to capture the normies that make political victory desirable for enough people of good character that they will act in concert.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-04 20:44:44 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107741674489329215

  • @Nationalist7346 Yes. And a plan if political means fail… 😉

    @Nationalist7346 Yes. And a plan if political means fail… 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-04 19:54:26 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107741476685838024

  • The nobles were defeated because feudalism was a temporary necessity given the i

    The nobles were defeated because feudalism was a temporary necessity given the inability to concentrate military, political, and economic power given the geography, crops, and state of development of the post-roman age. As soon as the north sea germanics rebuilt civ: ‘economics’

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-04 19:23:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1489681154974359557

    Reply addressees: @Erbhof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1489680423512952844

  • WRONG QUESTION: “ARE WE GOING TO LOSE OUR DEMOCRACY?” Confuses the importance of

    WRONG QUESTION: “ARE WE GOING TO LOSE OUR DEMOCRACY?”

    Confuses the importance of democracy (a luxury good with questionable value and all historical evidence against it) with the importance of self-determination by self-determined means that we imprecisely call sovereignty(political), liberty(economic), and freedom (individual). And worse, overstating the value of democracy understates the rule of law of the natural law of self-determination by self-determined means, by reciprocal insurance, by force of arms, of that self-determination, by the guarantee of sovereignty in demonstrated interests, reciprocity in-display word, and deed, limiting us to truth before face(self), duty before self, loyalty before self, and reciprocity in display word and deed, and the total prohibition on authority. The result of course is competition (markets) in all aspects of life, thus producing an open market for rule, government, economy, and society by the best competitors in those markets. And as such the rate of evolutionary innovation adaptation and application is unique to western civilization. IN other words, democracy is only meaningful if it is meritocratic and earned, and earned by reciprocal insurance in display word, and deed of all others willing to do so. This is why democracy requires chariots, cavalry, spear, phalanx, bowmen, and especially rifles: because all men have equal ability and interest to preserve their sovereignty along with that of others. SO the first ‘right’ is the right, responsibility, and inalienability to bear arms such that our insurance of one another, can produce the luxury of participatory government as an externality.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-04 19:08:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107741296082016361

  • Is that a rational comparison with division after division of combined arms movi

    Is that a rational comparison with division after division of combined arms moving quickly through a countryside to capture key cities?

    I dunno. The russian ppl will take hardship. USA won’t. We aren’t ‘white’ any longer.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-04 17:30:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1489652661586645016

    Reply addressees: @DScxdx

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1489651129105408000

  • With the information I have, I would say it’s very opportune for the anti-europe

    With the information I have, I would say it’s very opportune for the anti-european axis to eliminate the capacity of the USA to police the world simply by volume of action, and to defeat europe by consequence. France can’t do it. Germany’s disarmed. Eastern europe is weak.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-04 17:23:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1489650807100293132

    Reply addressees: @DScxdx

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1489646437315096580

  • AS PREDICTED, LIKE CLOCKWORK “Russia and China line up against US, NATO in no li

    AS PREDICTED, LIKE CLOCKWORK
    “Russia and China line up against US, NATO in no limits partnership.”
    The next is Iran against NE Saudis, then Israel.
    Why? Because germans overdid their self suppression and are unwilling to lead.

    The USA is autarkic. Europe is a dependent. Bye!

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-04 16:47:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1489641680160661504