RT @curtdoolittle: @luismdevilla No. Why do governments have rights to ambitions other than the condition of their people? Why does any gov…
Source date (UTC): 2022-03-17 17:48:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504515126954799105
The only legit requirement russia can make is that there are no missiles or nukes capable of reaching russia on ukrainian soil. This is a legit requirement. However, russia has now created the demand for precisely what it sought to oppose.
Source date (UTC): 2022-03-17 17:48:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504515090543955974
Reply addressees: @luismdevilla
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504508568812281858
Because politicals prevent the pursuit of other politicals for obvious reasons.
Source date (UTC): 2022-03-17 17:39:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504512814806876164
Reply addressees: @luismdevilla
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504512679595159557
No. Why do governments have rights to ambitions other than the condition of their people? Why does any government have any right to imperial ambitions?
Source date (UTC): 2022-03-17 17:39:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504512693960646657
Reply addressees: @luismdevilla
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504508568812281858
Because we have a deep undrestanding of russian ambitions and history. Our goal was to fully integrate russia. This was working until putin. Putin gradually adopted soviet, then imperial policies. This was exacerbated by demographic collapse. He has failed. We failed.
Source date (UTC): 2022-03-17 16:46:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504499468665774087
Reply addressees: @luismdevilla @aliceontheweb3 @insiliconot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504499055526821901
It is in the nature of conservatives to leap to these conclusions. I don’t do that. I predict a field of outcomes.
But yeah, biden is the worst possible president (a jimmy carter) for this kind of era. I want to end the institution of the president, it’s the worst of all.
Source date (UTC): 2022-03-17 16:41:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504498196642467844
Reply addressees: @luismdevilla
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504497789501419521
That’s true. It’s also the best reason to domesticate them by nato. Because the russian people are poor, and russians will die off as an ethnicity to pay for putin’s fantasy.
Source date (UTC): 2022-03-17 16:23:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504493583579205636
Reply addressees: @bitcornfarmer1 @aliceontheweb3 @insiliconot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504492714259320833
2ofN) (world not word)… However, we cannot let russia collapse because that would result in an even worse century. As such the only ‘good’ option is ‘domestication’ of russian government, it’s adoption of the norway model of resource use, and integration into NATO.
Source date (UTC): 2022-03-17 16:11:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504490599189295104
Reply addressees: @aliceontheweb3 @insiliconot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504490189955153925
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@aliceontheweb3 @insiliconot 1ofN) I can’t predict any outcome to the conflict. I can only understand incentives and resources. With the limited knowledge I have, it’s just as likely russia wins as ukraine.
But I am positive that a strategic victory for russia is catastrophic for the word this century.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1504490189955153925
1ofN) I can’t predict any outcome to the conflict. I can only understand incentives and resources. With the limited knowledge I have, it’s just as likely russia wins as ukraine.
But I am positive that a strategic victory for russia is catastrophic for the word this century.
Source date (UTC): 2022-03-17 16:09:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504490189955153925
Reply addressees: @aliceontheweb3 @insiliconot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504487401808297987
Yes we know that. That said, I am still correct. (a) capable reserves in case the west retaliates (b) inability to afford new weapon systems, (c) end of market for russian armor, (d) retreat to repairing old systems instead.
But The Russian Artillery Wasteland strategy does work.
Source date (UTC): 2022-03-17 15:54:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504486378117099534
Reply addressees: @insiliconot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1504485610001555462