THE UNDERLYING (UNNECESSARY) DIVISION BETWEEN EUROPE AND EUROPEAN RUSSIA
(Toward a unification of eurasia) https://t.co/BXKqFS8hdw

Source date (UTC): 2022-05-11 22:52:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524522935133872129
THE UNDERLYING (UNNECESSARY) DIVISION BETWEEN EUROPE AND EUROPEAN RUSSIA
(Toward a unification of eurasia) https://t.co/BXKqFS8hdw

Source date (UTC): 2022-05-11 22:52:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524522935133872129
Yep. And it’s all but uninhabitable.
Now compare demographics of china vs russia https://t.co/n7POQQKWtP

Source date (UTC): 2022-05-11 18:05:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524450604604698624
Reply addressees: @peachthuglord
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524449863689285632
@PeterZeihan : Question: Does this theory match your observations? Taking the gas/oil issue off the table reduces costs and chances of NATO division, tolerating a long term UA/RU conflict that drains RU combat capacity? Or is there some other ‘take’? https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1524436601266442242
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-11 17:18:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524438860205338626
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1524436601266442242
Europe is increasingly confident that it can assist the UA to victory over RU, and as such need to bear urgent resource costs is diminished. I am not competent to make that decision,and I am not sure they are intellectually honest enough to do so, but it removes division in NATO.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-11 17:09:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524436601266442242
8) There is no reason we cannot accomodate federation with a via negativa (veto) government, absent democratic via-positiva legislation, (Which is essentially elected, rule of law, constitutional monarchy) because all that matters is reciprocal insurance of rule of (natural) law.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-11 15:15:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524407752587726848
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524407751115427842
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
7) As such the West has be foolishly advocating democracy(luxury) and capitalism(utility) as if it was a religoius cult, when the means of producing cooperation at scale is Rule of Law(Sovereignty and Reciprocity), and middle class, trust, democracy are the result of its success.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1524407751115427842
7) As such the West has be foolishly advocating democracy(luxury) and capitalism(utility) as if it was a religoius cult, when the means of producing cooperation at scale is Rule of Law(Sovereignty and Reciprocity), and middle class, trust, democracy are the result of its success.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-11 15:15:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524407751115427842
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524407749890748419
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
6) But large heterogenous polities with a history of authority, lacking a majority middle class, and the resulting advanced economy, retaining low trust norms, even under rule of law, can only tolerate democratic VETO of a government, until they have developed high trust norms.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1524407749890748419
6) But large heterogenous polities with a history of authority, lacking a majority middle class, and the resulting advanced economy, retaining low trust norms, even under rule of law, can only tolerate democratic VETO of a government, until they have developed high trust norms.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-11 15:15:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524407749890748419
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524407748519153668
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
5) Small homogenous polities with a history of rule of law, a majority middle class, the resulting advanced economy, and high trust norms, can tolerate the luxury good of democratic legislation regulated by sufficiently articulated constitutions producing rule of law.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1524407748519153668
5) Small homogenous polities with a history of rule of law, a majority middle class, the resulting advanced economy, and high trust norms, can tolerate the luxury good of democratic legislation regulated by sufficiently articulated constitutions producing rule of law.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-11 15:15:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524407748519153668
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524407747298701314
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
4) Imperial Russans are wrong in that Rule of Law sufficiently articulated, to protect against ‘libreral decadence’ combined with westward federation for reciprocal defense, is impossible – when it is the only survivable solution possible.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1524407747298701314
3) Federated europeans are wrong in attempting to export PERMISSIVE liberalism to the incomplete project of Russian domestication of turkic and siberian peoples and territory.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-11 15:15:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524407745939742720
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524407744693997575
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
2)Given that Russia is still domesticating conquered eurasian territories, it is rational that Russian needs are different from European needs. And russian fear of liberalism and decadence are also rational. But her threat to the west prevents completion of the eurasian project.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1524407744693997575
@PentagonPresSec John, Can you make some time to do the country some good, and educate the White House Press Sec Office in how to hold adult conversations with the media – or at least fake it a bit better?
Compliments on your job. Thanks for your service. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-11 01:02:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1524193119364911104