I don’t see that at all. I see it as making use of the pieces on the chessboard such that the total game is won, not just some pieces to satisfy my priors. They are not the first people to stop. They are the last.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 20:47:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881443538531135939
Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881439274991849749
Can you try again with a little more precision?
the USG is in fact trying to prevent the CCP in this generation like the Soviets in the past, and Russians today, from biasing the informational environment upon which the suggestable people (useful idiots on both sides and the middle) can be manipulated. We need to add the Israelis but that won’t happen until the iranian problem is solved.
Reply addressees: @CloudByter
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 20:23:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881437453451735040
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881436877649277423
Operationally explain how you can have sovereignty when you are a tiny country without any capacity to produce that sovereignty, and there are plenty of others surrounding you that can easily deprive you of it.
How can you have sovereignty of yourself within a polity if you have no capacity to produce it yourself, when there are many others who could easily deprive you of it.
There is no ideology or philosophy or preference here. It is merely one of whether it is more advantagous to form alliances despite the spectrum of costs, or to become the victim of the alliances of others willing to pay the cost of depriving you of it.
Didn’t your experience with the soviets teach you anything? How to lose seventy years of development?
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @calabrianvice
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 20:17:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881435986565173248
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881435180973666667
No one is justifying anything except what is intended by the republic: a market competition for influence. The fact that different sets of elites rotate in and out is a feature of continuous adaptation. It’s the noisest political system doing the most dirty laundry in pubic, but it still works better than the rest by adapting to that rotation of elites rather than calsifying on ‘bad emperors’ as in china and russia, or ‘bad priests’ as in iran.
What you’re saying is you don’t want to have to compete in the market for influence.
Because you’d lose.
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @Lord__Sousa
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 20:13:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881434871618486272
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881434133949550643
Oh martin. Solving the J question is something we can do internally. Solving the geostrategic question is something that might take the application of force externally. And you are discounting the future consequences of NOT resisting the restoration of empires and imperial monopolization of resources and trade by uses of force. And the consequential harm to not only us but the rest of the world upon which we depend for preserving our superior conditions.
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @calabrianvice
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 20:01:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881431921504460800
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881430028216652235
IS THE USA STILL A REPUBLIC AND NOT AN OLIGARCHY?
Assertion:–“The USA is an oligarchy. The democracy is just a mask for oligarchy.”– @AutistocratMS
Yes, elements of oligarchic influence—lobbying, corporate donations, and elite power concentration—are undeniable. However, these influences exist within the framework of a constitutional republic, where competing interests, public accountability, and the rule of law continue to hold significant sway. The presence of oligarchic tendencies does not erase the broader system of representative democracy, nor does it eliminate the checks and balances designed to prevent the consolidation of unaccountable power.
Oligarchy is defined by the dominance of a small, cohesive ruling class. In contrast, the U.S. operates as a vast marketplace of competing interests—corporations, unions, grassroots movements, NGOs, and factions of varying size and strength. These factions vie for influence in a contest that prevents any single oligarchy from consolidating unchecked power. This competition is further counterbalanced by electoral cycles, judicial independence, public opinion, and institutional safeguards.
The U.S. remains a constitutional republic. Its structure—separation of powers, regular elections, judicial review—prevents the indefinite dominance of any single entity or group. While abuses occur, the system provides mechanisms for correction and redress over time, even if such redress escalates to the extreme, such as civil war.
The fragmentation of the population has exacerbated perceptions of oligarchic dominance. Immigration from lower-trust cultures, the incorporation of women whose preferences skew toward infantilism (evasion of responsibility framed as caretaking), the divisiveness of Marxist-feminist ideologies, and the resulting frustration of the citizenry have collectively weakened civic engagement and most importantly loyalty and trust. This decline, more than structural inevitability, explains the perception of oligarchy. Sedition, conflict, frustration, and apathy—not systemic inevitability—are the greater threats.
If one claims the U.S. is an oligarchy, one must demonstrate how it meets the criteria—static, unaccountable, concentrated power—and explain how competing interests and institutional safeguards fail to disqualify that claim. Ergo, it is insufficient to label the system an oligarchy without addressing the mechanisms that counterbalance elite power.
The U.S. remains a republic. It faces challenges from concentrated power but is fundamentally structured as a system of competing interests governed by laws and public accountability. By focusing on its mechanisms for correction and the ongoing contest of principles, we can clearly counter the claim that it has devolved into an oligarchy.
Cheers,
CD
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @Lord__Sousa
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 19:55:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881430336330178560
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881424525679882713
Q:CURT:–“Are you in favour of TikTok being forced to sell due to pressure from Greenblatt because the ADL can’t access its analytics on behalf of Israel?”– @calabrianvice
That’s a dishonest (loaded and framed) question. It’s beneath me to respond as stated, but I’ll take the opportunity to reframe it and respond properly instead. 😉
1. I am in favor of depriving the CCP of the ability to influence the young – the most suggestible female and male population (useful idiots).
2. I am in favor of depriving the Russians of the ability to influence the most suggestible male population (useful idiots).
3. I am in favor of depriving the entire series of Feminine-Semitic-Abrahamic-Marxist-Trotskyist-CulturalMarxist-Postmodern-Feminist-Woke movements of their ability to influence the vast majority of the susceptible population (useful idiots) – whether those movements are foreign or domestic.
But I also understand they are all using the same feminine means of deception and that it’s not just intentional, but cultural, and yes genetic, as it is an expression of the female means of social sedition as warfare against the responsibility that western masculine civilization seeks to maximize since our formation on the steppe.
This is all possible because we have given the talking classes an opportunity for sedition not seen since the invention of organized religion.
These people want what we have but won’t limit themselves to truth reciprocity sovereignty and the duty of responsibility those demand in order to obtain those benefits.
Instead of responsible truthful, rational, adults who bear responsibility and it’s costs, the feminine seeks to control and manipulate by undermining ‘adulting’ by the process of infantilization.
Now I’ve ‘scienced’ this feminine method. You can watch videos of my presentations at our conferences.
And what my work means, is that we can equally outlaw cognitively feminine means of criminality, sedition, and warfare as thoroughly as we have male. And over the course of a decade or so we will all learn to treat their lies as we do superstitions and frauds.
We can end the existence of useful idiots by ending the legality of the feminine means of lying.
Video Series:
1. Keynote – The Science of Western Civilization – CD
https://t.co/mNrLgBeivf
2. The Cause and Cure of the Crisis of Our Age – CD
https://t.co/7gevR2NeOR
3. Abrahamism: A Method of Deceit – CD
https://t.co/sFYAyaRqlf
4. The History of Abrahamism – Martin Stepan
https://t.co/vLVuefz0W1
Videos 1 Are from the Playlist 2023 Fall Convention
Videos 2,3,4 Are From Playlist 2024 Summer Convention:
https://t.co/Rbzp4pE4uk
As far as I know the following videos are in production for release as they are completed.
5. Our Present Condition (determinism of CW2.0) -CD
6. The Law: A System of Measure – CD
7. The Course & Conduct of a Revolution – CD
Cheers
CD
Reply addressees: @calabrianvice @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 19:22:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881421962154766336
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881407827765559647
The USA is a Republic. And yes it is not a democracy. And that’s a GOOD thing. And as far as I know the form of government between oligarchy and democracy is republic (rule of law, natural law, aristocratic representatives, with the minority of demonstrably responsible citizens…
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 19:04:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881417509724909574
Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881409619446423652
He isnt out. Just the opposite. They are grooming him for future presidency and want him with senate or gubernatorial experience.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 09:16:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881269499120484542
Reply addressees: @UBERSOY1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881195201101971460
TikTok isn’t back, it’s not even given a reprieve, it’s being given a chance to sell. And Trump’s idea is what we at the institute have been recommending for any industry we wish to repatriate: partial federal ownership and therefore public share in the returns.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 04:16:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881193964243669375