RT @elonmusk: I’ve had a top secret clearance for many years and have clearances that themselves are classified.
That said, FAR too much…
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-14 21:03:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1890507241540726830
RT @elonmusk: I’ve had a top secret clearance for many years and have clearances that themselves are classified.
That said, FAR too much…
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-14 21:03:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1890507241540726830
RT @xenocosmography: … Understanding MAGA as restoration of America to its ‘factory settings’ is a blessed formulation.
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-11 15:29:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1889335898774643161
Unclear. Instead, blocking policy is different from blocking access to a department overseen by the executive branch. I don’t see how that stands nor have I seen an argument that survives basic scrutiny. We should keep in mind that the judges sometimes buy time because either they don’t feel competent to rule with the arguments presented or they want an excuse to pass it up the judicial hierarchy. Judicial competence in these matters is limited to the federal appeals and Supreme Court. As such while its increasingly true ideology is the origin, it’s equally true that education even in the legal profession has been equally subject to decline and expanded incompetence as it has been elsewhere. The number of people with sufficient iq and knowledge declines with average iq, and the USA is hurting.
Reply addressees: @RichardArion1
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-10 23:13:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1889090251592994816
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1889088146236658102
RT @mmjukic: Watching Elon speedrun the entire development of cutting-edge modern online political theory, at an accelerating pace even, ha…
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-10 22:48:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1889084020094566489
More EU nonsense https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1888909657256722820
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-10 22:46:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1889083552790368541
RT @curtdoolittle: Very smart.
If this doesn’t happen in the next few days our organisation might consider an action either directly or in…
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-10 22:43:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1889082827645538562
Very smart.
If this doesn’t happen in the next few days our organisation might consider an action either directly or in parallel. https://twitter.com/RealDanHuff/status/1888975398299435477
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-10 22:43:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1889082791436190051
DYNAMIC GOVERNMENT IS NECESSARY
Stages:
Windfall (Democracy) – The government distributes the windfall to the citizens either directly or by capitalizing it for their benefit.
Going Concern (Republic) – The government defers to the people in matters domestic, while concentrating investment in long term returns (capitalization).
Time of War (General-Dictator) – The general is above the law in the concentration of all resources for the preservation of the sovereignty of the polity.
Crisis of Restoration (Monarchy) – The monarchy is above the law in the restoration of the law.
We always can learn from the romans or greeks.
There is no steady state of government because there is no steady state in the world. The population must direct its energies dependent upon the conditions of the moment.
(via Brad Werrell @WerrellBradley) @bradley
Cheers
CD
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-09 18:06:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1888650693013327872
–Q:”If Congress passes legislation … who is to say the legislation is not “appropriate”–
Good Question.
Unlike europe where the parliament is sovereign (rules) over the people, in the USA, the people are sovereign, not the government, and the constitution enumerates the terms by which the people grant the government responsibility for administration of the environment in which the people live.
Consequently, the Constitution limits what is ‘appropriate’ for congress to legislate.
The limit is the natural law that the founders relied upon as stated in Blackstone. And the natural law is best disambiguated by ‘the natural law of cooperation under universal defense of sovereignty of the individual in his demonstrated interests, and the resulting demand for reciprocity in display word and deed.’
As such does the legislation passed by congress violate the natural law of cooperation, which in the abstract means ‘does it impose costs upon the demonstrated interests of the population without just compensation for that imposition’?
And costs here mean the entire spectrum of demonstrated interests whether personal, kin, private, semi-private, common informal, common formal, or common material.
As such the congress, because of the laxity of the court during the marxist-trotskyist attempt to undermine the constitution, commonality and concurrency, and natural law, sought by lawfare and by positive law, to create sovereignty for the legislature against the people, during the 50s thru 70s.
This court (thanks largely to the Federalist Society’s work since 1980) seeks to restore the constitution and the sovereignty of the states and the people. And this president seeks to do the same. both of which return the government to the service of the union of states rather than to some desire for world government – a world government we sought to end world wars, but which was captured by the financial, bureaucratic and academic and media sectors to create world government and subvert national sovereignty to some globalist ideology.
Cheers
CD
Reply addressees: @AccurateCaption
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-07 18:39:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1887934293315567618
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1887927683494850920
Yes, though one of the holes in the constitution is the inability of the court to ASSIGN a decision to the legislature, which must then rule upon it within some period of time, else the court must or may rule upon it.
The other hole of course, is that there is no requirement that legislation pass the court for its legality prior to assent. The court instead must wait for a dispute to arise among those with standing before illegal (unconstitutional) legislation is reversed. And there is no punishment for the advancement of illegal legislation.
Reply addressees: @AccurateCaption
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-07 18:19:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1887929108098859008
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1887926530648719819