RT @Rasmussen_Poll: Doesn’t prevent you from getting COVID
Doesn’t prevent you from spreading COVID
Doesn’t have zero side effects, some ge…
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-22 15:29:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628416631461277696
YOU’RE PROBABLY SILLY. 😉
Anyone with a political opinion should try to write a constitution, articles, rights, obligations, and inalienations, the common code – and the policy and procedure for each department and service – and prove you’re not silly. 😉
You will rapidly discover you’re silly.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-22 01:54:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628211573817851904
WHY DID LIBERTARIANISM FAIL?
Libertarianism failed for reasons leading libertarians have stated: there are no advanced books, and no substantial meaningful, competitive theories and literature of libertarianism.
The reason is, that it would look like rule of law by the natural law or sovereignty and reciprocity and would read like a slightly better version of Smith, Hume, Blackstone, The federalist papers, the declaration and the constitution.
In other words, libertarianism is adolescent classical liberalism at best, and the questionable ethics of the separatist Jews of the Pale who sought to avoid all costs of producing commons at worst
Why? Lower-class marxism, middle-class libertarianism, upper-class neoconservatism, Anti-female feminism, non-European cultural marxism, and non-white race marxism.
it’s not complicated. just more advanced that the Jewish, Christian, Muslim culture war against indo-european civilization in the ancient world – repeated once again, for the same reason:
European civilization requires responsibility that only Europeans, and then only a minority of Europeans, are able and willing to bear.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-22 01:41:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628208375770103810
(FWIW: I’ve done the work, hopefully, publish late this year. That doesn’t mean I’m right and there aren’t other alternatives. But the proof is in the pudding: Anyone with an opinion should try to write a constitution, articles, rights, obligations, and inalienations, and the common code – and prove you’re not silly. 😉 If you can’t do that you don’t really know enough to know you’re not silly so to speak. I found it took me a couple of decades and I’m not done yet. The founders had seventy of the best minds of the age. And it took them seven months. ) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-22 01:32:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628206021058469888
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628195832729067522
RT @Outsideness: DeSantis is (surely unquestionably) the better man, but Trump II Payback Time Muthfuckas is the American president we dese…
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 21:07:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628139283516166155
JL (all)
You speak with great confidence about a thing of demonstrable ignorance.
Population density is a vulnerability, not a strength. Conflicts are decided by a tiny minority of under one percent. Just as behavior in a polity is determined by under ten percent. Just as the most intolerant minority determines social norms. Just as the majority has no influence on the production of policy. Some of us have done a revolution. It’s trivially easy to seize and opportunity and those opportunities are heading for us at escape velocity.
How long did it take the federal government to fold in the 60’s? 3 weeks. We don’t even require a condition of violence today. We need only the threat of internal conflict and the externalities it would cause – in weeks. We are in a period of external vulnerability and internal fragility. And suffering from abuse of the peace dividend both internally and externally.
There are no conditions under which people who are hated in a polity will tolerate governance by those who hate them. Especially when the result is their disenfranchisement, disabuse, economic and political predation, and economic deprivation.
The greatest chance of victory is the certainty of conflict that leads to compromise and resolution before it accelerates. The greatest chance of conflict that causes destruction is the overconfidence that such a conflict is impossible or unwinnable.
I laud your popularization of and attack on the woke. But the tendency of public intellectuals with success in a domain to overreach to the point of harmful incompetence is the same as that of governments who overreach to the point of incompetence.
-fin-
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 21:05:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628138967970287617
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627872904057655296
If it wasn’t that serious, I wouldn’t have frequent visits from the FBI to confirm that I don’t have aspirations here that were demonstrated elsewhere.
The federal government has been preparing for revolt since the first year of the Obama administration. It’s the reason for the aggressive ‘woke-ing’ of the military.
Processes are deterministic. History only rhymes. English civil war, American revolutionary war, the war of 1812, civil war, near civil war in the 1930s, and near civil war in the 1960s.
Our political model is the most adaptive. But this is the first time since the civil war that the matter is so serious there is no other means of resolution than devolution and decentralization.
I know how to win. I’m not alone. It’s not even hard. It doesn’t even require violence. It requires timing. One takes advantage of opportunities with tiny efforts that use momentum, rather than organizing monumental effort to create sufficient momentum to produce an opportunity.
My job is just to have in hand the solution to the crisis. I don’t doubt the crisis, or leadership will emerge. Because it takes a tiny percentage of the population to make it happen.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 20:50:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628135175358976016
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628128203679141896
RT @AureliusStoic1: @elonmusk @KanekoaTheGreat @DavidSacks @amuse Woke Land is being pushed back, slowly.
The next two major fronts in the…
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 20:22:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628127971104985092
As a classical liberal, His is correct that fascism is wrong.
If you asked SRHicks if there is a difference between fascism and napoleon total war, other than total war is temporary, and fascism claims a permanent ideology, then I suspect he’d agree with you.
If you asked me that same question, I’d respond the same way. IMO ideologies are just different methods of conducting warfare during the industrial revolution’s transfer of power from land to industry, and from aristocracy to middle classes, with the empowerment of the lower classes via that industry threatening the middle classes.
The question for the future, which I’ve not discussed recently but have frequently in the past, is how we, like the Romans, transition from a war-government (fascism) to a prosperity government (classical liberalism) with the same ease as did the Romans until Julius Caesar without getting ‘stuck’ in fascism. For all intents and purposes that’s what the depression-second world war combination did to the states.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 18:19:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628097186750775297
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628095146087645185
(Correct. Fascism is necessary to conduct ideological warfare against socialists and communists, just as all other personal sacrifices for the good of all are necessary in times of material warfare.)
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 18:08:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628094223298752512
Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628092837563703297