Theme: Governance

  • The west is wrong to tolerate the marxist spectrum from marxism to neoMarxism, t

    The west is wrong to tolerate the marxist spectrum from marxism to neoMarxism, to postmodernism, to feminism, to PC and Woke. It’s wrong to place the individual’s expression over that of the production of people capable of producing healthy productive intergenerational families. This decadence, yes.

    The RU is wrong, the CN are wrong, and the IR are wrong, because the evidence in every culture is that people want self-determination, natural and human rights, and to prohibit empires of conquest against their will. They are not just wrong they are immoral and evil for oppressing others. Just like the communists and Islamists before them.

    So if you think the west is ‘bad’ you confuse the best with perfect. We are the best that can be. We have raised mankind out of poverty. And we can be better still if we end the marxist-to-woke enemy’s cult forever.

    Reply addressees: @dingmanschoice @IAmAsaJ


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 23:54:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632530151815753728

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632524470572154880

  • ATLAS OF IMPUNITY Impunity is the exercise of power without accountability, whic

    ATLAS OF IMPUNITY
    Impunity is the exercise of power without accountability, which becomes, in its starkest form, the commission of crimes without punishment. The Atlas of Impunity is a comprehensive tool designed to track the abuse of power across five key https://www.kofiannanfoundation.org/articles/atlas-of-impunity/… https://t.co/YyRfyQn3Pf


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 21:19:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632491162790514690

  • (a chat you’ll want to watch) TODAY’S CHAT: Part1: Viking(European) vs Semitic(J

    (a chat you’ll want to watch)
    TODAY’S CHAT:
    Part1: Viking(European) vs Semitic(Jewish) ethics,
    Part2: the Reality of American Postwar Strategy vs Conservative Conspiracy thinking.
    https://youtu.be/SNKuHp-Mbyg


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 18:13:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632444196307992577

  • RT @EricMorganCoach: I don’t think free speech absolutists understand the idea o

    RT @EricMorganCoach: I don’t think free speech absolutists understand the idea of the informational commons.

    I also think they don’t unde…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 05:19:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632249434049331202

  • I agree. Is the government?

    I agree. Is the government?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 02:31:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632207216638820354

    Reply addressees: @AlexBauer98Kr @BernieRakocevic @Lavrovskyi

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632206869656641539

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @ChPayton1 @Lavrovskyi Well, while you’re sentiment’s correct

    RT @curtdoolittle: @ChPayton1 @Lavrovskyi Well, while you’re sentiment’s correct, technically speaking, the UA never had the chance to get…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 01:55:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632198088419954689

  • The rather unfortunate other side of the western guarrantee of self determinatio

    The rather unfortunate other side of the western guarrantee of self determination by self determined means, is we insure you have a choice, but you must “choose wisely”. If a people allows its government to commit such crimes against humanity, then the people are guilty of doing so, and obviously will pay the price for their poor judgement.

    Iraq initiated the problem by Invading and destroying Kuwait. American mistake was in ‘not completeing the job’ at that time. Then Iraq harassed troops and challenging the no fly zone.

    The majority of deaths were due to th esunni-shia conflict and the insurgency.

    DEATHS
    –“Deaths by cause in the iraq war:
    Coalition military forces: According to official sources, a total of 4,431 coalition military personnel, including 4,488 US troops, were killed in the Iraq War.

    Iraqi military forces: It is estimated that between 20,000 and 30,000 Iraqi military personnel were killed in the conflict.

    Iraqi civilians: The number of Iraqi civilian deaths is a subject of debate and varies widely depending on the source. Some estimates suggest that over 100,000 civilians were killed, while others put the figure much higher. The majority of civilian deaths were caused by insurgent attacks, sectarian violence, and military operations.

    Insurgents: It is difficult to estimate the number of insurgents who were killed during the conflict. However, it is believed that many thousands were killed in US-led military operations, including air strikes and ground offensives.

    Contractors and journalists: A significant number of contractors and journalists were also killed during the Iraq War. According to official figures, 318 contractors and 144 journalists were killed.’–

    INSURGENTS
    —“The insurgents included a variety of groups with different motivations and ideologies, including:

    Ba’ath Party loyalists: Many former members of Saddam Hussein’s Ba’ath Party, which had ruled Iraq before the invasion, joined the insurgency. They were motivated by a desire to regain power and opposed the US-led occupation of the country.

    Sunni Arab militias: Sunni Arabs, who made up the majority of the Ba’ath Party and had held significant political and economic power under Saddam Hussein, also joined the insurgency. They were concerned about the loss of their influence and power under the new Shia-dominated government.

    Islamist militants: A number of Islamist groups, including Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), also joined the insurgency. These groups were motivated by a desire to establish an Islamic state in Iraq and to fight against what they saw as Western imperialism and influence in the Middle East.

    Criminal groups: Some criminal organizations joined the insurgency to take advantage of the instability and to profit from illegal activities.”—

    CAUSES
    –“There are several reasons why so many people died in the Iraq War:

    1. Military conflict: The Iraq War was a military conflict, and therefore, there were many casualties on both sides. The United States, which led the invasion, deployed a large number of troops, and faced significant resistance from Iraqi forces. The fighting was intense and led to many casualties on both sides.

    2. Insurgency and terrorism: After the initial invasion, there was a prolonged insurgency in Iraq, which was marked by terrorist attacks, suicide bombings, and other forms of violence. These attacks targeted both military personnel and civilians, resulting in a high number of deaths.

    3. Sectarian conflict: The Iraq War also exacerbated existing sectarian tensions in the country between the Shia and Sunni populations. This led to violent clashes, including attacks on civilians and mass killings.

    4. Infrastructure damage: The war caused significant damage to the country’s infrastructure, including hospitals, water treatment plants, and electrical grids. This damage led to a deterioration in public health and safety, resulting in additional deaths.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 01:37:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632193590846734336

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632188575541256192

  • The rather unfortunate other side of the western guarrantee of self determinatio

    The rather unfortunate other side of the western guarrantee of self determination by self determined means, is we insure you have a choice, but you must “choose wisely”. If a people allows its government to commit such crimes against humanity, then the people are guilty of doing so, and obviously will pay the price for their poor judgement.

    Iraq initiated the problem by Invading and destroying Kuwait. American mistake was in ‘not completeing the job’ at that time. Then Iraq harassed troops and challenging the no fly zone.

    The majority of deaths were due to th esunni-shia conflict and the insurgency.

    DEATHS
    –“Deaths by cause in the iraq war:
    Coalition military forces: According to official sources, a total of 4,431 coalition military personnel, including 4,488 US troops, were killed in the Iraq War.

    Iraqi military forces: It is estimated that between 20,000 and 30,000 Iraqi military personnel were killed in the conflict.

    Iraqi civilians: The number of Iraqi civilian deaths is a subject of debate and varies widely depending on the source. Some estimates suggest that over 100,000 civilians were killed, while others put the figure much higher. The majority of civilian deaths were caused by insurgent attacks, sectarian violence, and military operations.

    Insurgents: It is difficult to estimate the number of insurgents who were killed during the conflict. However, it is believed that many thousands were killed in US-led military operations, including air strikes and ground offensives.

    Contractors and journalists: A significant number of contractors and journalists were also killed during the Iraq War. According to official figures, 318 contractors and 144 journalists were killed.’–

    INSURGENTS
    —“The insurgents included a variety of groups with different motivations and ideologies, including:

    Ba’ath Party loyalists: Many former members of Saddam Hussein’s Ba’ath Party, which had ruled Iraq before the invasion, joined the insurgency. They were motivated by a desire to regain power and opposed the US-led occupation of the country.

    Sunni Arab militias: Sunni Arabs, who made up the majority of the Ba’ath Party and had held significant political and economic power under Saddam Hussein, also joined the insurgency. They were concerned about the loss of their influence and power under the new Shia-dominated government.

    Islamist militants: A number of Islamist groups, including Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), also joined the insurgency. These groups were motivated by a desire to establish an Islamic state in Iraq and to fight against what they saw as Western imperialism and influence in the Middle East.

    Criminal groups: Some criminal organizations joined the insurgency to take advantage of the instability and to profit from illegal activities.”—

    CAUSES
    –“There are several reasons why so many people died in the Iraq War:

    1. Military conflict: The Iraq War was a military conflict, and therefore, there were many casualties on both sides. The United States, which led the invasion, deployed a large number of troops, and faced significant resistance from Iraqi forces. The fighting was intense and led to many casualties on both sides.

    2. Insurgency and terrorism: After the initial invasion, there was a prolonged insurgency in Iraq, which was marked by terrorist attacks, suicide bombings, and other forms of violence. These attacks targeted both military personnel and civilians, resulting in a high number of deaths.

    3. Sectarian conflict: The Iraq War also exacerbated existing sectarian tensions in the country between the Shia and Sunni populations. This led to violent clashes, including attacks on civilians and mass killings.

    4. Infrastructure damage: The war caused significant damage to the country’s infrastructure, including hospitals, water treatment plants, and electrical grids. This damage led to a deterioration in public health and safety, resulting in additional deaths.”—

    Reply addressees: @MauriceeAubin


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 01:37:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632193590439886848

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632188575541256192

  • WHAT WESTERN HEGEMONY? What hegemony? The USA insures all PEOPLE (not government

    WHAT WESTERN HEGEMONY?
    What hegemony? The USA insures all PEOPLE (not governments) have the right to free trade, secure borders, human rights, and natural rights, in order to prevent the reconstruction of empires that abused all of the above.

    That was the ‘trade’ the USA/UK offered after the world wars: “We will sacrifice our modern economies to pay for policing the world until the age of agrarian empires is over and the age of federations of sovereign nations and people with natural rights has completed the transformation under free trade and the internaltional-rules-order (reciprocity), creating a condition where world wars made necessary by empires is never created again.”

    Where has the USA or NATO interfered where it was not to preserve this promise for all human beings?

    Why should any group of people in any government have the right or ability to deprive other people of self-determination, by self-determined means, by the natural law of reciprocity, and the human rights and obligations necessary to create and preserve that reciprocity?

    You can’t make an argument against it that doesn’t justify the extermination of you and yours (or anyone) for doing so. It’s not possible.

    The only complaint that’s possible is that the west’s experiment with ‘liberalism’ meaning placing the individual’s wants above those of the family’s needs, has been a failure because it creates decadence that destroys countries from within.

    That doesn’t change anything other than a few constitutional rules, and you get everything the rest of the world wants, EXCEPT the ability to rule those who do not want to be ruled by you. And the right to call upon the world for rescue if any group tries to rule you against your will.

    There is no possible moral argument against this policy.

    The fact that the USG and EUROPE don’t state it as clearly as I did, and instead harp on liberty and democracy is merely internal propaganda whereby our own governments try to implement policies we don’t want.

    Go ahead and argue with me. All you can say is that as the world’s police, we have made mistakes because we have too optimistic an opinion of less developed people’s abilities, development, and behavior.

    -Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 00:27:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632176029958643713

  • WHAT WESTERN HEGEMONY? What hegemony? The USA insures all PEOPLE (not government

    WHAT WESTERN HEGEMONY?
    What hegemony? The USA insures all PEOPLE (not governments) have the right to free trade, secure borders, human rights, and natural rights, in order to prevent the reconstruction of empires that abused all of the above.

    That was the ‘trade’ the USA/UK offered after the world wars: “We will sacrifice our modern economies to pay for policing the world until the age of agrarian empires is over and the age of federations of sovereign nations and people with natural rights has completed the transformation under free trade and the internaltional-rules-order (reciprocity), creating a condition where world wars made necessary by empires is never created again.”

    Where has the USA or NATO interfered where it was not to preserve this promise for all human beings?

    Why should any group of people in any government have the right or ability to deprive other people of self-determination, by self-determined means, by the natural law of reciprocity, and the human rights and obligations necessary to create and preserve that reciprocity?

    You can’t make an argument against it that doesn’t justify the extermination of you and yours (or anyone) for doing so. It’s not possible.

    The only complaint that’s possible is that the west’s experiment with ‘liberalism’ meaning placing the individual’s wants above those of the family’s needs, has been a failure because it creates decadence that destroys countries from within.

    That doesn’t change anything other than a few constitutional rules, and you get everything the rest of the world wants, EXCEPT the ability to rule those who do not want to be ruled by you. And the right to call upon the world for rescue if any group tries to rule you against your will.

    There is no possible moral argument against this policy.

    The fact that the USG and EUROPE don’t state it as clearly as I did, and instead harp on liberty and democracy is merely internal propaganda whereby our own governments try to implement policies we don’t want.

    Go ahead and argue with me. All you can say is that as the world’s police, we have made mistakes because we have too optimistic an opinion of less developed people’s abilities, development, and behavior.

    -Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 00:27:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632176029782401024