Theme: Governance

  • You do realize that the only reason the USA hasn’t ‘corrected’ iran, is because

    You do realize that the only reason the USA hasn’t ‘corrected’ iran, is because they want israel and the saudis to do it (and pay for it). And as long as they want to, and as long as there is any chance of uprising in iran, then the USA won’t have to. However, american military,…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 04:27:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634048225966473216

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633821427760615425

  • The Libertarian and Conservative views(wants) government as an INSURER, while th

    The Libertarian and Conservative views(wants) government as an INSURER, while the Progressive views(wants) government as a manager, or god help us, a provider.
    WHY? because a conservative takes responsibility and a progressive evades responsibility.
    WHY? Because the male seeks agency and responsibility in the pursuit of status, and the female seeks dependence and irresponsibility in the pursuit of status.
    WHY? children demand from women, women demand from men, men provide and die younger. 😉
    Or at least, that worked until the sixties. 😉

    Reply addressees: @BobMurphyEcon


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 03:09:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634028755206242306

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634022695837761537

  • The Libertarian and Conservative views(wants) government as an INSURER, while th

    The Libertarian and Conservative views(wants) government as an INSURER, while the Progressive views(wants) government as a manager, or god help us, a provider.
    WHY? because a conservative takes responsibility and a progressive evades responsibility.
    WHY? Because the male seeks agency and responsibility in the pursuit of status, and the female seeks dependence and irresponsibility in the pursuit of status.
    WHY? children demand from women, women demand from men, men provide and die younger. 😉
    Or at least, that worked until the sixties. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 03:09:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634028755294322688

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634022695837761537

  • Royal family, other than harry and his wh–re, seem to be doing just fine. And s

    Royal family, other than harry and his wh–re, seem to be doing just fine. And signs are Charles will not be as ‘delicate’ as his mother. UK will go thru a bit of a crisis and have a reform. I expect that to occur as soon as germany’s economic tanks, and much of europe with it.…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-09 23:50:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633978613635723264

    Reply addressees: @enigma3078

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633974031241158658

  • Royal family, other than harry and his wh–re, seem to be doing just fine. And s

    Royal family, other than harry and his wh–re, seem to be doing just fine. And signs are Charles will not be as ‘delicate’ as his mother. UK will go thru a bit of a crisis and have a reform. I expect that to occur as soon as germany’s economic tanks, and much of europe with it.
    Of course, I would prefer we restore the ’empire’ as the Anglosphere. We already operate that way. But an open market between USA, UK, AUS, AN NZ (and maybe canada lol) would give us global control of the seas while the ‘world island’ battles it out.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-09 23:50:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633978613530853376

  • RT @whatifalthist: American politics. Right wing politics-Anxious suburban mom.

    RT @whatifalthist: American politics. Right wing politics-Anxious suburban mom. Left wing politics-22 year old girl who knows nothing about…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-09 23:35:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633974794935836673

  • NO THE US AND EU ARE NOT EMPIRES. BUT… US, EU, and NATO are federations(US, EU

    NO THE US AND EU ARE NOT EMPIRES. BUT…
    US, EU, and NATO are federations(US, EU) and alliances (NATO, US&EU) since membership is voluntary. And while the US federal govt is imperial since the Civil War over domestic states, the EU is purely federal. How do you know? You can’t leave an empire. You can leave a federation or an alliance. The american model is superior to the eu model because of the limited and technical criteria of the constitution, but the eu model is superior to the US model becase a state (or territory) cannot secede and restore self determination.

    The general concept is that federations are necessary defense, trade, credit and insurance capacities. While sovereign states are necessary for self determination. WHile empires have no utility other than domestication and conversion of pre-state territories, into functional states that can then participate in a federation.

    A star is born so to speak.

    Reply addressees: @Whorehammer40DD


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-09 19:51:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633918361980510209

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633905810974842881

  • NO THE US AND EU ARE NOT EMPIRES. BUT… US, EU, and NATO are federations(US, EU

    NO THE US AND EU ARE NOT EMPIRES. BUT…
    US, EU, and NATO are federations(US, EU) and alliances (NATO, US&EU) since membership is voluntary. And while the US federal govt is imperial since the Civil War over domestic states, the EU is purely federal. How do you know? You can’t leave an empire. You can leave a federation or an alliance. The american model is superior to the eu model because of the limited and technical criteria of the constitution, but the eu model is superior to the US model becase a state (or territory) cannot secede and restore self determination.

    The general concept is that federations are necessary defense, trade, credit and insurance capacities. While sovereign states are necessary for self determination. WHile empires have no utility other than domestication and conversion of pre-state territories, into functional states that can then participate in a federation.

    A star is born so to speak.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-09 19:51:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633918362160967682

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633905810974842881

  • THE IMPORTANCE THAT WE IGNORE: UK vs USA I might be making a more subtle point t

    THE IMPORTANCE THAT WE IGNORE: UK vs USA
    I might be making a more subtle point than you’re intuiting. There are a small number of differences in our governments that have rather outsized consequences.

    That is that despite what we intuit, the class(rotatable) and caste(non-rotatable) systems appear, worldwide, to be as necessary as are ranks in the military, and the institutionalization of some sort of religion: they produce ‘mindfulness’ and mindfulness is necessary for inter-sexual, inter-class, inter-cultural cooperation.

    UK vs USA DIFFERENCES
    1) the added layer of barristers
    2) the method of debate from Q&A in the parliament (vs our speech makers)
    3) the monarchy as judge of last resort. “above the law in the restoration of the law”
    4) the multi-party system instead of dominant vs minor two-party system
    4) And oddly enough, the class system. (This)
    -vs-
    1) Written constitution and transactional law.
    2) People, Natural Law, and Constitution as sovereign instead of parliament as sovereign.
    3) Our supreme court under that sovereignty
    4) Our ‘odd’ religious right that treats that constitution with the same respect as it does the bible – our internal defense against the irresponsibility of democratic socialism.

    In particular, classes (rotatable castes) provide people with duty and respect for fulfilling them, regardless of their rank. The false promise of the american ‘aristocracy of everyone’ and the french ‘everyone under the pretense of peerage’ and the postwar british catastrophic experiment with democratic socialism have created the fertile ground for claims of oppression when all we observe is meritocracy. But meritocracy by a single standard where few are due respect, instead of a hierarchy of standards where all are due respect – WITHIN their competency.

    -Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Bucklander1


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-09 15:09:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633847404045778949

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633844212260302854

  • THE IMPORTANCE THAT WE IGNORE: UK vs USA I might be making a more subtle point t

    THE IMPORTANCE THAT WE IGNORE: UK vs USA
    I might be making a more subtle point than you’re intuiting. There are a small number of differences in our governments that have rather outsized consequences.

    That is that despite what we intuit, the class(rotatable) and caste(non-rotatable) systems appear, worldwide, to be as necessary as are ranks in the military, and the institutionalization of some sort of religion: they produce ‘mindfulness’ and mindfulness is necessary for inter-sexual, inter-class, inter-cultural cooperation.

    UK vs USA DIFFERENCES
    1) the added layer of barristers
    2) the method of debate from Q&A in the parliament (vs our speech makers)
    3) the monarchy as judge of last resort. “above the law in the restoration of the law”
    4) the multi-party system instead of dominant vs minor two-party system
    4) And oddly enough, the class system. (This)
    -vs-
    1) Written constitution and transactional law.
    2) People, Natural Law, and Constitution as sovereign instead of parliament as sovereign.
    3) Our supreme court under that sovereignty
    4) Our ‘odd’ religious right that treats that constitution with the same respect as it does the bible – our internal defense against the irresponsibility of democratic socialism.

    In particular, classes (rotatable castes) provide people with duty and respect for fulfilling them, regardless of their rank. The false promise of the american ‘aristocracy of everyone’ and the french ‘everyone under the pretense of peerage’ and the postwar british catastrophic experiment with democratic socialism have created the fertile ground for claims of oppression when all we observe is meritocracy. But meritocracy by a single standard where few are due respect, instead of a hierarchy of standards where all are due respect – WITHIN their competency.

    -Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-09 15:09:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633847404234506247

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633844212260302854