WE CAN EXIST AS MANY SMALL STATES – A federation of small ethnically homogenous nation states is the optimum personal, social, economic, and political order of man. There is no longer value in empires. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1638583229929201682
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 17:51:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638599172960952330
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1638583229929201682
–“We’re telling you that criminals are running the place, their crimes are evident and demonstrable, and you can end their criminality, corruption, and or complacency, and this is how you can do so.”– Brandon Hayes
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 14:39:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638550941250060295
THE UNIVERSE AND MAN IN A NUTSHELL
“A universally commensurable, value neutral, paradigm, vocabulary, and grammar of ethics, morality, and politics” results in a formal logic of cooperation (returns on time), and as such a formal logic of law (conflict resolution), and formal logic of politics (commons), and formal logic of economics (scale).
Now, you wouldn’t think all this was possible, but it turns out that there is just one fundamental law to the universe (evolutionary computation), and a tiny set of derivations of (applications of) that law, as we scale the complexity of the universe from the quantum background to matter, to life, to cooperation(ternary logic), to the words we speak and ideas we produce.
And as such we can measure variation from that law – that ‘optimum’ minimum variation from the laws of the universe, and maximum exploitation of those laws of the universe, by discovering new means of evolutionary computation wjether by matter biology, cooperation, or ideas. Because there is only one means of improving man’s condition while under continous evolution, and that’s the capture and transformation of energy per capita.
P-Method, P-Logic, P-Law an the Legal,Constitutional, and Policy Reforms, necessary for our continued evolution – and prevention of another dark age.
It’s a lot of work. As much as any other STEM degree.
However, it is the unification of the sciences: physical, behavioral, evolutionary, and formal.
But it is also the most demanding of our psychology and emotions – because we prefer to cheat mother nature whenever possible. And in doing so violate the laws of nature we call ‘cooperation’.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 13:48:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638538077197983747
THE UNIVERSE AND MAN IN A NUTSHELL
“A universally commensurable, value neutral, paradigm, vocabulary, and grammar of ethics, morality, and politics” results in a formal logic of cooperation (returns on time), and as such a formal logic of law (conflict resolution), and formal logic of politics (commons), and formal logic of economics (scale).
Now, you wouldn’t think all this was possible, but it turns out that there is just one fundamental law to the universe (evolutionary computation), and a tiny set of derivations of (applications of) that law, as we scale the complexity of the universe from the quantum background to matter, to life, to cooperation(ternary logic), to the words we speak and ideas we produce.
And as such we can measure variation from that law – that ‘optimum’ minimum variation from the laws of the universe, and maximum exploitation of those laws of the universe, by discovering new means of evolutionary computation wjether by matter biology, cooperation, or ideas. Because there is only one means of improving man’s condition while under continous evolution, and that’s the capture and transformation of energy per capita.
P-Method, P-Logic, P-Law an the Legal,Constitutional, and Policy Reforms, necessary for our continued evolution – and prevention of another dark age.
It’s a lot of work. As much as any other STEM degree.
However, it is the unification of the sciences: physical, behavioral, evolutionary, and formal.
But it is also the most demanding of our psychology and emotions – because we prefer to cheat mother nature whenever possible. And in doing so violate the laws of nature we call ‘cooperation’.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 13:48:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638538077063847936
Difference between replacing humans to stop repetitive stress injuries to the body, and replacing humans to replace interpersonal service. This is an easy legislative fix.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 00:59:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638344519161618432
Reply addressees: @Philosophi_Cat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638217931644366848
(I share most of your disapproval of the capture of our institutions and redirection of the postwar strategy for internationalization of cosmopolitainism. I don’t share your optimism in multi-polarity, nor in the chances of RU/IR/CN. As far as I can tell, the age of empires ends with the age of federations. And the urge for self determination will continue whether to resist the MENA in eurasia, sustain MENA in eurasia, to sustain resurgent authoritarianism in South America, and to accomodate coming crises in africa will eventually play out as a return to 19th century trade patterns, the conflict of civilizations, and ever increasing differences between IQ of ADVANCEABLE high trust and un-advanceable low trust countries.)
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 23:25:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638321074835275776
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638200231937593345
(I share most of your disapproval of the capture of our institutions and redirection of the postwar strategy for internationalization of cosmopolitainism. I don’t share your optimism in multi-polarity, nor in the chances of RU/IR/CN. As far as I can tell, the age of empires ends with the age of federations. And the urge for self determination will continue whether to resist the MENA in eurasia, sustain MENA in eurasia, to sustain resurgent authoritarianism in South America, and to accomodate coming crises in africa will eventually play out as a return to 19th century trade patterns, the conflict of civilizations, and ever increasing differences between IQ of ADVANCEABLE high trust and un-advanceable low trust countries.)
Reply addressees: @TOOEdit
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 23:25:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638321074700967936
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638200231937593345
Lenin, Gramsci and the ‘long march’ thru our institutions – Doug Wilson: https://youtube.com/shorts/1dBoqEN0c8c?feature=share
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 22:43:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638310465129291781
RT @ThruTheHayes: TIKTOK IS A WEAPON
The super-suite: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram; these are anti-social media. But, there remains functi…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 21:25:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638290683357192193
Bryan,
What would you suggest, if I were to interview @ErikVoorhees, I try to draw attention to? I understand the moral message but then of course, that’s ‘not enough’ to make the case.
As you know I have these concerns:
1) that registry and transfer of title are more important than money substitutes.
2) that trading the spectrum of financial instruments is more important than money substitutes.
3) that originating and holding loans and only selling shares in them is more important than money substitutes.
4) that escrow and clearing are more important than money substitutes.
5) that solving ‘banklessness’ is more important than money substitutes.
6) that modern economies cannot function without fiat currency (and privatization of appreciation isn’t earned income.)
7) that States can (and likely will) create digital fiat and will suppress non-state money substitutes.
8) that most states will issue short term exchange for existing digital for fiat digital, before gradually suppressing them.
9) So my question is, are we really so much worried about money substitutes, or even if we only solve the above problems isn’t that enough?
10) Maybe, why not just call digital what it is? Shares in the network (token money), and treat it like any other tradable financial medium, as a way of insulating one’s wealth from inflation et al?
Thanks 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 21:07:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638286347260526595
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638278376795394050