Theme: Governance

  • What is the surprise? 1) Our postwar strategy was to prevent the restoration of

    What is the surprise?
    1) Our postwar strategy was to prevent the restoration of empires that caused the world wars, and instead, enforce national sovereignty, human rights, and world trade, despite the cost to working class Americans, in a successful effort to raise the world out of poverty, and end the incentive for world wars.
    2) Ukraine wanted its sovereignty and wanted to join the EU, and be out of the Russian orbit, because Russia was behind undermining their military, their government, and their economy, and moreover, they wanted to join NATO after RU invaded in ’14 – which before we would not have agreed to.

    3) Everyone knew that RU would just stall and start the war again to take all of ukraine. We all hoped to buy Ukraine time to recover, build up its military, so that it could resist the obvious future Russian invasion. Otherwise (as now) we would end up fighting russia directly. I mean, in 2014 russia was threatening the baltics and even sweden with conquest.

    4) Yes, without ousting Yanukovych, Poroshenko and Klitchko and many others, might not have been able and willing to step in.

    5) Containing Russia despite their post-soviet wars of aggression in the caucuses and elsewhere to restore the RUssian empire, has been an objective since 1945.

    I suspect the public has dimwit or no memory of these things as if this stuff hasn’t been an ongoing struggle for a century.

    So please tell me what’s odd here. This is all pretty much common knowledge. So I’d have to understand how the conspiracy theory folk interpret this as other than the obvious.

    Reply addressees: @bryanbrey @elonmusk @KanekoaTheGreat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-06 21:23:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644088512214335489

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644077554007957504

  • FWIW: you are mistaken that the voting is ‘whites’ when it’s ‘white women’. As l

    FWIW: you are mistaken that the voting is ‘whites’ when it’s ‘white women’. As long as you don’t distinguish that it’s a largely female, and largely urban issue of irresponsibility then you’ll continue to be ‘biased’ by the illusion that we have fundamentally changed as western men, rather than enough white women have ‘defected’ to satisfy their natural neuroticism by devotion to the leftist religion, and enough men have found profit in ‘selling it to them’, you’ll think it’s a bigger problem than it is. Statistics are pretty clear: they got enough white women to defect, because women are more vulnerable to suggestible to, and manipulable by victim ideologies.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-06 13:29:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643969216645586946

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643967123629264897

  • FWIW: you are mistaken that the voting is ‘whites’ when it’s ‘white women’. As l

    FWIW: you are mistaken that the voting is ‘whites’ when it’s ‘white women’. As long as you don’t distinguish that it’s a largely female, and largely urban issue of irresponsibility then you’ll continue to be ‘biased’ by the illusion that we have fundamentally changed as western men, rather than enough white women have ‘defected’ to satisfy their natural neuroticism by devotion to the leftist religion, and enough men have found profit in ‘selling it to them’, you’ll think it’s a bigger problem than it is. Statistics are pretty clear: they got enough white women to defect, because women are more vulnerable to suggestible to, and manipulable by victim ideologies.

    Reply addressees: @dissidentwrath


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-06 13:29:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643969216540823553

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643967123629264897

  • ZEIHAN’S EXPLANATION OF SAUDI ARABIA (He’s as verbally brutal as the saudis are

    ZEIHAN’S EXPLANATION OF SAUDI ARABIA
    (He’s as verbally brutal as the saudis are physical) 😉
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjHk_-ImfFs


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-06 13:09:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643964124676628481

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @shuter_marian @SRCHicks TWO QUESTIONS 1) Yes, we are at a ti

    RT @curtdoolittle: @shuter_marian @SRCHicks TWO QUESTIONS
    1) Yes, we are at a tipping point but Americans go through this process regularly…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-06 01:13:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643784026962927616

  • Killing is killing. Killing matters. Individual Responsibility Matters. Reproduc

    Killing is killing.
    Killing matters.
    Individual Responsibility Matters.
    Reproductive Responsibility Matters.
    What killings we tolerate is a political choice.
    Because people who kill are not people we want among us.
    Women have killed more children throughout history than men have killed in war.
    Women are now able to kill them before they are born.
    Given our differences this is a local decision.
    And the supreme court made the right decision to return it to a local decision.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-06 01:13:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643783921220427782

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643781238724112387

  • Killing is killing. Killing matters. Individual Responsibility Matters. Reproduc

    Killing is killing.
    Killing matters.
    Individual Responsibility Matters.
    Reproductive Responsibility Matters.
    What killings we tolerate is a political choice.
    Because people who kill are not people we want among us.
    Women have killed more children throughout history than men have killed in war.
    Women are now able to kill them before they are born.
    Given our differences this is a local decision.
    And the supreme court made the right decision to return it to a local decision.

    Reply addressees: @rscotttipton1A @FrankDeScushin


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-06 01:13:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643783921107124224

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643781238724112387

  • The supreme court did it’s job correctly and returned the matter to the states.

    The supreme court did it’s job correctly and returned the matter to the states.
    Roe v Wade violated the requirement of concurrency in legislation, and that’s why they returned the matter to the states.
    Over time the states will largely restore abortion or not as they see fit.
    And one of the greatest mistakes by the court, that set a prescendent for permitting the bypassing of the legislatures, and the people, will have been corrected.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-06 00:54:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643779242436485120

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643732936905175040

  • The supreme court did it’s job correctly and returned the matter to the states.

    The supreme court did it’s job correctly and returned the matter to the states.
    Roe v Wade violated the requirement of concurrency in legislation, and that’s why they returned the matter to the states.
    Over time the states will largely restore abortion or not as they see fit.
    And one of the greatest mistakes by the court, that set a prescendent for permitting the bypassing of the legislatures, and the people, will have been corrected.

    Reply addressees: @FrankDeScushin


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-06 00:54:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643779242331611140

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643732936905175040

  • Youj’re just storytelling as if you actually know the answer. Who did more for w

    Youj’re just storytelling as if you actually know the answer. Who did more for working class incomes in the past decades than trump, especially across the races? No one. His strategy was to end the burning the incomes of the laboring, working, lower middle, and middle classes, for the sake of globalism; to end wars that cost us but produced nothing but more costly conflict for us; to end european free-riding on our high military costs; to close or borders and protect the incomes of our working classes; and to end the free trade that benefitted the world at the expense of our working classes. He tried to end the entire class of people in our government who live off persisting this postwar strategy at the expense of our people. The fact is tnat you have little to no understanding of economics and we had the best economic policy in generations – and you kicked him out of office because he’s not ‘likeable’. Some of us are empiricists. We aren’t looking for political mommy’s and daddy’s to tell us nice stories. We want material difference for us, our children and the generations to come. And the fact that you’re as conformative, suggestable, influencable, and manipulable by simple emotions is the reason our people are abused and suffer this condition of decline. And that behavior, your behavior, is exactly why we were so deeply warned about the inclusion of women in the voting pool. Because women, and specifically ethinically white women, decide national votes, brecause they are the only block that votes emotionally and against the national interest. The rest of us suffer from your simplicity, emotional immaturity, and economic and political ignorance. We are powerless against those of you who are little more than children in matters public.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-05 23:56:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643764533549301760

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643760027378016257