Theme: Governance

  • NLI members and friends. You’re in the list. I don’t think you’re a candidate fo

    NLI members and friends. You’re in the list.
    I don’t think you’re a candidate for the other list.
    Even that list I’m going to pare down.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-12 01:08:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645957061618946048

    Reply addressees: @anderstegn

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645953134660034560

  • @HAARETZcom, All; The european ‘aristocratic’ interpretation of the ‘jewish prob

    @HAARETZcom, All;
    The european ‘aristocratic’ interpretation of the ‘jewish problem’ was that the culture and religion of an insular diaspora prohibited the formation of a sufficient state that would force the primacy of the behavior of masculine realism in politics rather than jewish feminine idealism in social orders.

    The jewish ethic favors feminine consensus by pilpul seeking agreement, instead of the western logical and empircal discovery of truth as a means of consensus. The difference is that the responsibility of diasporic separatists reliant on feminine consensus or agreement rather than landed state-creating warriors reliant on evidentiary and material truth, and responsibiilty for private and common before self and family.

    So this feminine ethic allowed claims of pretense of innocence and victimhood despite the irreciprocal means of profiting from host populations.

    So, at least among our learned class, our ‘hope’ has been, at least since we proposed the ‘relocation of the jews to their homeland’, that once responsible for a state, the jewish self identity, ethic, morals, politics, and ‘laws’ would reform to reflect the necessity of self preservation of autonomy in a modern rule of law state, thus ending the “problem of jewish asymmetric ethics and specialization in rent seeking and baiting into hazard.”

    It’s very hard to build and hold a state by the social construction of ideas, philosophies, ethics, morals, laws and scripture that for all intents and purposes violate the laws of the universe.

    There are no feminine states for a reason.
    And there never will be.
    And frankly an assertive israel, that achieves the population of the netherlands, will dominate the region for obvious reasons too impolitic to state here in this forum.
    And that would better the jewish people, repair their deserved reputation for parasitism and sedition, and make themselves, the middle east, and the rest of the world by externality, a better place for all of us.

    Reply addressees: @haaretzcom


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-12 01:07:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645956753455022081

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645301834398027776

  • @HAARETZcom, All; The european ‘aristocratic’ interpretation of the ‘jewish prob

    @HAARETZcom, All;
    The european ‘aristocratic’ interpretation of the ‘jewish problem’ was that the culture and religion of an insular diaspora prohibited the formation of a sufficient state that would force the primacy of the behavior of masculine realism in politics rather than jewish feminine idealism in social orders.

    The jewish ethic favors feminine consensus by pilpul seeking agreement, instead of the western logical and empircal discovery of truth as a means of consensus. The difference is that the responsibility of diasporic separatists reliant on feminine consensus or agreement rather than landed state-creating warriors reliant on evidentiary and material truth, and responsibiilty for private and common before self and family.

    So this feminine ethic allowed claims of pretense of innocence and victimhood despite the irreciprocal means of profiting from host populations.

    So, at least among our learned class, our ‘hope’ has been, at least since we proposed the ‘relocation of the jews to their homeland’, that once responsible for a state, the jewish self identity, ethic, morals, politics, and ‘laws’ would reform to reflect the necessity of self preservation of autonomy in a modern rule of law state, thus ending the “problem of jewish asymmetric ethics and specialization in rent seeking and baiting into hazard.”

    It’s very hard to build and hold a state by the social construction of ideas, philosophies, ethics, morals, laws and scripture that for all intents and purposes violate the laws of the universe.

    There are no feminine states for a reason.
    And there never will be.
    And frankly an assertive israel, that achieves the population of the netherlands, will dominate the region for obvious reasons too impolitic to state here in this forum.
    And that would better the jewish people, repair their deserved reputation for parasitism and sedition, and make themselves, the middle east, and the rest of the world by externality, a better place for all of us.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-12 01:07:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645956753668882432

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645301834398027776

  • RT @ConceptualJames: Would you like your individual rights trampled by the Woke?

    RT @ConceptualJames: Would you like your individual rights trampled by the Woke?

    Would you like your individual rights trampled by Muslims…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-11 09:03:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645714226529333248

  • RT @MartianHoplite: @ConceptualJames Classical liberalism is not as great of a f

    RT @MartianHoplite: @ConceptualJames Classical liberalism is not as great of a failure as Marxism, because it does have some successes it c…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-11 09:03:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645714092156485632

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @BtothaAtothaD @ConceptualJames @TheLaurenChen Yes. Conservat

    RT @curtdoolittle: @BtothaAtothaD @ConceptualJames @TheLaurenChen Yes. Conservatism should mean keeping government out of the way of civili…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-11 08:41:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645708621244772352

  • Yes. Conservatism should mean keeping government out of the way of civilization.

    Yes. Conservatism should mean keeping government out of the way of civilization.

    Which in turn means maximizing individual responsibiilty thereby distributing government to every capable adult, and limiting its necessity.

    Unfortunately a large percent of the polity and…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-11 08:41:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645708605595721729

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645636982721204224

  • James (all) Conservatism is stated morally instead of scientifically and legally

    James (all)
    Conservatism is stated morally instead of scientifically and legally, while the marxist sequence is stated pseudoscientifically and with sophistry as a fraud. We can (I have) state conservatism as what it consists of doing not of what it claims to morally value: self determination and self determined means, sovereignty and reciprocity, duty before self and truth before face, judged by empirical evidence, in the commonality of dispute resolution by the common law, and concurrency in legislative contract. If you don’t know what commonality in law, and concurrency in voting (legislation) mean then you don’t grasp that they are empirical requirements for the prohibition of authority.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-10 20:39:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645526875580629018

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645455345261633537

  • James (all) Conservatism is stated morally instead of scientifically and legally

    James (all)
    Conservatism is stated morally instead of scientifically and legally, while the marxist sequence is stated pseudoscientifically and with sophistry as a fraud. We can (I have) state conservatism as what it consists of doing not of what it claims to morally value: self determination and self determined means, sovereignty and reciprocity, duty before self and truth before face, judged by empirical evidence, in the commonality of dispute resolution by the common law, and concurrency in legislative contract. If you don’t know what commonality in law, and concurrency in voting (legislation) mean then you don’t grasp that they are empirical requirements for the prohibition of authority.

    Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames @TheLaurenChen


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-10 20:39:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645526875488354317

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645455345261633537

  • RT @StevePender: @TRHLofficial Let’s start from the opposite. Who should be *ALL

    RT @StevePender: @TRHLofficial Let’s start from the opposite.

    Who should be *ALLOWED* to vote? What does voting intrinsically do? It deleg…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-10 13:52:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645424584072495107