Theme: Governance

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @evansrc717 @SteveSchmidtSES @IHeartUkraine WHAT THE REPUBLIC

    RT @curtdoolittle: @evansrc717 @SteveSchmidtSES @IHeartUkraine WHAT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WANTS? A REPUBLIC.
    (that’s our unique inheritance)…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-24 11:26:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672566905155067904

  • WHAT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WANTS? A REPUBLIC. (that’s our unique inheritance) So,

    WHAT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WANTS? A REPUBLIC.
    (that’s our unique inheritance)

    So, you’re wrong.

    Republicans just don’t want an authoritarian state government or economy like western european social democracies (france) because they are unsurvivable, and american world advantage that drives the world’s innovation and consumption would be unsurvivable.

    This is especially true given the exhaustion of western institutional and technological advantage by globalization, the exhaustion of non-western group potential under the rules based order that allowed globalization, and the failure of globalization to end the age of authoritarian agrarian empires because the west was too ‘kind’ to China and Russia instead of finishing the transition in world war two.

    Westerners are W.E.I.R.D. And our experience with immigration and multiculturalism has demonstrated we remain so – and the rest of the world can’t adapt to western high trust responsibility (“Whiteness”). So they have given up on Republics (liberalism) and are returning to the safety of low trust authoritarianism.

    Our experimental project has failed.

    The Republicans and now the Court are trying to restore rule of law, by the natural law, of commonality (in law) concurrency in voting) and individual responsibility and to end legal activism, circumventing commonality and concurrency.

    Because they are trying to preserve the republic (rule of law, natural law, commonality, concurrency) that requires we agree by class and region when voting, and before passing legislation, or codifying findings of the court.

    And you are trying to create a democracy (popular rule) which always and everywhere must without exception result in a race to the bottom of authority, corruption, and poverty.

    Though as far as I know the restoration of the republic will require devolution of much of the federal government (domestic empire) back to the states. (And this is toing to happen anyway if we are to avoid a bloody house to house civil war on the scale of the wars of religion.)

    Why? Conservative maximization of individual responsibility in exchange for liberty (prohibition on authority) vs progressive minimization of responsibiilty in exchange for safety (generating demand for authority).

    Simple example: western conservative truth-before-face and the high trust result, and progressive face-before-truth (woke) and the decline in social trust (bowling alone).

    You feel like you’re right. But you’re wrong, and you must be, and there is no possibility that you’re not. It’s just science.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @evansrc717 @SteveSchmidtSES @IHeartUkraine


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-24 11:26:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672566882233114626

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669333920721117186

  • Been reading this feed for ten minutes, and you’re the first person to state the

    Been reading this feed for ten minutes, and you’re the first person to state the obvious. Not so much a russian civil war but if it causes the collapse of the government, and it’s eastward effects … that’s going to be a catastrophe.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-23 21:48:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672360980133687298

    Reply addressees: @NickHannula

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672357157960929287

  • RT @Steve_Sailer: Peter Turchin has a new book out: “I suspect Peter Turchin doe

    RT @Steve_Sailer: Peter Turchin has a new book out:

    https://www.amazon.com/End-Times-Counter-Elites-Political-Disintegration/dp/0593490509/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1686651811&sr=1-1

    “I suspect Peter Turchin doesn’t get much attention because h…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-23 19:29:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672326022249738246

  • NO MORE LIES. THERE IS ONLY ONE END TO RACE DIFFERENCES IN INGROUP PREFERENCE Th

    NO MORE LIES. THERE IS ONLY ONE END TO RACE DIFFERENCES IN INGROUP PREFERENCE
    The best way to end racism is to end the forcible integration of groups with vastly different (lower) class sizes, causing status and economic competition that is not resolvable. You can’t create equality between a group with 15% of the population incapable of learning even basic skills, sustainable employment, self-regulation, and self-care, with one with more than 50% of their numbers unfit, because 90% of the population (mean 85, SD 15) is incapable of learning from written instructions or repairing basic machines. There is no possible means of compensation for those differences that will not produce political conflict, because all political conflict originates in differences, and the norms and values necessary to accommodate those differences.

    NO MORE LIES.
    The experiment has failed.
    The optimum polity for non-conflict, cooperation, harmony, and redistribution is a small homogenous ethnostate with rule of law, courts under rule of law, and a monarchy as judge of last resort, with the nuclear or traditional family – and not the individual – as the purpose of policy, because the family order generates demand for a polity that repeats the family order.
    Period
    End of story.
    No More Lies.

    Let a thousand nations bloom. that’s the answer. Because as separate states, we are cousins, friends, allies, and competitors, but within states, we will always be hostiles for irreversible reasons. Turning the West into the middle east our South America by the false promise of multiculturalism will result, and is resulting, in the same decline in trust, civic participation, and government legitimacy.

    Restore the USA to its original constitution as a union of states (like Europe under the holy roman empire and the church) with shared defense and treasury but the local choice of social, economic, and political preferences that suit the needs of the biological demands of the population distribution., The difference between the primary races and their hybrids is the degree of neotenic evolution trading rate and depth of maturity, resulting in aggression and impulsivity, for agency, pliability, and self-regulation. It’s called domestication syndrome. And the four primary races evolved in neotenic order: African, South Eurasian (MENA+India) , Europe, and East Asia. And the data is incontestable unless you’re a science denier because we know the cause of development from the neural tube outward and the effect of neotenic selection on the expression of maturity as cells migrate from the neural tube. Sorry, the science is done. No More Lies.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @MichaelEhline @WiseSquirrel_


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-23 19:03:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672319482037936154

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672217974781132800

  • RESPONSIBILITY, FAMILY STRUCTURE, POLITICAL SYSTEM “Family Structures Drove 20th

    RESPONSIBILITY, FAMILY STRUCTURE, POLITICAL SYSTEM

    “Family Structures Drove 20th Century Ideology”
    Liberalism: Nuclear Family
    Fascism: Patrilinial Family
    Communism: Exogamous Clan
    https://youtube.com/shorts/R7NNVe76RfY
    All groups try to replicate their families in politics.

    Again: we’re bots…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-23 10:05:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672184188697542657

  • RESPONSIBILITY, FAMILY STRUCTURE, POLITICAL SYSTEM “Family Structures Drove 20th

    RESPONSIBILITY, FAMILY STRUCTURE, POLITICAL SYSTEM

    “Family Structures Drove 20th Century Ideology”
    Liberalism: Nuclear Family
    Fascism: Patrilinial Family
    Communism: Exogamous Clan
    https://t.co/S7tBKzcVDa
    All groups try to replicate their families in politics.

    Again: we’re bots – until we’re not. And responsibility is how we insure we are not. What my good friend @whatifalthist doesn’t mention is that these families represent a spectrum of decreasing individual responsibility from the nuclear to the parilineal to the exogamous.

    Political systems like family systems represent resposibiilty of the individual which in turn produces the degree of trust in the population. Ergo family systems like political systems reflect the trustworthiness of the population.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-23 10:05:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672184188571725825

  • RESPONSIBILITY, FAMILY STRUCTURE, POLITICAL SYSTEM “Family Structures Drove 20th

    RESPONSIBILITY, FAMILY STRUCTURE, POLITICAL SYSTEM

    “Family Structures Drove 20th Century Ideology”
    Liberalism: Nuclear Family
    Fascism: Patrilinial Family
    Communism: Exogamous Clan
    https://t.co/S7tBKzcVDa
    All groups try to replicate their families in politics.

    Again: we’re bots – until we’re not. And responsibility is how we insure we are not. What my good friend @whatifalthist doesn’t mention is that these families represent a spectrum of decreasing individual responsibility from the nuclear to the parilineal to the exogamous.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-23 10:04:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672183762191261698

  • RESPONSIBILITY, FAMILY STRUCTURE, POLITICAL SYSTEM “Family Structures Drove 20th

    RESPONSIBILITY, FAMILY STRUCTURE, POLITICAL SYSTEM

    “Family Structures Drove 20th Century Ideology”
    Liberalism: Nuclear Family
    Fascism: Patrilinial Family
    Communism: Exogamous Clan
    https://t.co/S7tBKzcVDa
    All groups try to replicate their families in politics.

    Again: we’re bots – until we’re not. And responsibility is how we insure we are not. What my good friend @whatifalthist doesn’t mention is that these families represent a spectrum of increasing individual responsibility from the nuclear to the parilineal to the exogamous.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-23 09:59:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672182619675455489

  • RT @Will_Benge: @curtdoolittle The Greeks employed the ostra each year. They vot

    RT @Will_Benge: @curtdoolittle The Greeks employed the ostra each year. They voted on which official deserved banning from government, for…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-22 22:02:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672002195548434437