Theme: Governance

  • I’d prefer if we all stopped trying to outshame each other, and just try to take

    I’d prefer if we all stopped trying to outshame each other, and just try to take control of the organs of state. How about that? 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-29 21:15:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696632621415924091

    Reply addressees: @JohnnyR84030075 @Lauren_Southern

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696623723670040902

  • Brilliant narrative analogy. Technically this is a variation on the tragedy of t

    Brilliant narrative analogy.
    Technically this is a variation on the tragedy of the commons.
    And a flawless example of Hoppe’s warning that politicians are renters that create a tragedy of the commons, thereby restoring the demand for rule of law and monarchy to prevent them from… https://twitter.com/Lauren_Southern/status/1696561151457350112

  • Anti-Semitism has nothing to do with Fascism. Anti-Semitism was a POLICY that wa

    Anti-Semitism has nothing to do with Fascism. Anti-Semitism was a POLICY that was the result of the open rebellion against the Germans by the Jews, who like today’s woke, had applied the same strategy as today’s woke. There is nothing new with this policy because Jews had been outcast from many dozens of countries for the same reasons over and over again.

    Fascism is a counter-revolution against both the hedonism of the French and English, and the threat of the communists. We know that because that’s what they said they were doing.

    What is fascism? It’s the militarization of the nationalism of the monarchical system, using the Napoleonic invention of Total War, in an attempt to prevent a repetition of the French destruction of Germany, which caused the need for German unification, by the Russian Soviet militarization of the economy, society, and politics, in order to conquer Europe as it had to the east..
    (Germany was in the right in each case for that matter.)

    Marxism is an evolution of the Abrahamic sequence:

    Version 1: Supernaturalism (Occult Fictionalism)
    1. Judaism ->
    2. … Christianity,
    3. … … Islam

    Into the Marxist sequence:

    Version 2: Pseudocience (Magical Fictionalism)
    1. Marxism(Lower Class) -> communism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, pc-woke,
    2. … Marxism->libertarianism(middle class) and
    3. … … Marxism-> Leninism Trotskyism, NeoConservatism (upper class).

    Using the same method of lying in the Abrahamic and Marxist versions using the Jewish unification of Roman Law, Greek Reason, and Semitic Mythicism into a competitor to the Bible of the Ancient World: the Epi. Cycle. And that’s why the Jews, Christians, and Muslims destroyed almost all records of the Epic Cycle, despite commentary on it being as pervasive as biblical was in the medieval ages.
    https://t.co/wZOLMCAb4u

    The Hebrew bible wasn’t new, it was a cheap imitation of the existing European Mediterranean canon. Instead of claiming these stories were myths, that they were truths.

    Let me know if I have to correct any other errors and fictions.

    Cheers.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @AntonyArakkal1 @MadsMikkel28560 @Viorp2 @Thedukeistheman @Sargon_of_Akkad


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-29 18:23:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696589492029702144

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696567476308373663

  • UNDERSTANDING THE 20TH CENTURY POLITICAL EXPERIMENTS (Law, Socialism, Maxism, Le

    UNDERSTANDING THE 20TH CENTURY POLITICAL EXPERIMENTS (Law, Socialism, Maxism, Leninism, Fascism)

    All,
    When we discuss the evolution of experiments with organizing humans in modernity, we would be better off discussing the specific approaches used and the influences that caused them to make the PRACTICAL decisions each country and group made.

    The English invention of the empirical rule of law modern state, and it’s commercial rather than religious, social, or political organization, and the equality of opportunity, given the higher trust of the english people and the maturity of their institutions, as a continuation of the domeestic practice of the englis as they expanded in the age of sail. And the american order is simply a textual formalization of the english order.
    (‘A Legal Order’)

    The French Socialist philosophical invention of the origional meaning of socialism, meaning the organization of the administrative state for the benefit of the people rather than the aristocracy nobility and burghers, and the mediation of inequality of outcome, given the lower trust of the french people, their greater heterogeneity, with france being the most politically backward state in europe – and as a european reformationary movement.
    (‘A Bureaucratic Order’)

    The Marxist pseudoscientific distortion of socialism to the centralized state control of production and the equality of outcome, given the zero trust of the jews and underclasses, the total absence of experience with governance or rule, in fact the long history of jewis incompetence at rule, and even their inability to subsist non-parasitically with host populations, and especially total lack of exeperience with the behavior of human beings at scale – as an international revolutionary movement.
    (a ‘Social Order’)

    The Leninist ideological distortion of french -> marxist socialism given the zero trust of the jews and lower classes, the total inexperence of with governance and rule, the primitive agrarian state of development, and the acknowledgement of the demonstrated behavior of people at scale.
    (a ‘Military Order’)

    The Fascist ideological counter-revolution against the English Legal, French ‘Liberal’, and Jewish Marxist, and Russian Leninist alternatives. Given the high trust and sense of duty and piety of the german people given that they were surrounded, that france had destroyed the holy roman empire,
    (a ‘Pseudo-Monarchical Order’)

    Tip: The English were right on the seas where they were dominant and secure. The Fascists were right on the continent where they were surrounded and insecure. Everyone else was wrong. Because socialism, marxism, leninism, maoism, the jews, and the laggarts we call the muslim fundamentalists were all wrong.

    Why? every polity doubles down on it’s group strategy like a drug addict until they crash hard enough that they need to reform.

    Europeans are misunderstood: we crashed and reformed often and quickly and in doing so, despite being the youngest race, the young civilization, with small numbers, at the edge of the bronze age revolution, by the accident of the only possible means of organizing clans of steppe herders competing with horse, bronze, and wheel: rule of law and democratic choice.

    In other words, the government of cattle raiders, of marines(rome), of vikings, of pirates, and of diasporic naval conquerors, whether land or sea, is the origion of sovereignty, the origin participatory government, the origin of rule of law, the origin of contractual legislation, and subsequently the origion of reason, philosophy, natural philosophy, empiricism, and science, and the fact that in just three short periods in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, europeans almost excluslively, and faster than all other civilizations combined, dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the victimization by a nature hostile to our existence.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @MadsMikkel28560 @Viorp2 @Thedukeistheman @AntonyArakkal1 @Sargon_of_Akkad


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-29 16:32:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696561361147383810

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696551574888222988

  • Yes. That’s useful. I work largely on lies used in politics. But these myths are

    Yes. That’s useful.
    I work largely on lies used in politics.
    But these myths are perhaps more important in daily life.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-29 14:35:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696532088378581409

    Reply addressees: @cremieuxrecueil @seb_lefebvre_o

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696278111283753093

  • Religion causes stagnation. China’s problem was the power of the state and the e

    Religion causes stagnation. China’s problem was the power of the state and the entrenched bureaucracy – they converted from an empirical to a moralizing government.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-29 13:32:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696516178397565240

    Reply addressees: @Viorp2 @AntonyArakkal1 @Sargon_of_Akkad

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696492566554828873

  • RT @Dan52775344: @curtdoolittle @RobertNewmanUSA Classical liberalism – the prin

    RT @Dan52775344: @curtdoolittle @RobertNewmanUSA Classical liberalism – the principles of the founding fathers- applied consistently would…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-28 21:26:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696273050721751442

  • Understood. Though, Secession will destroy those departments, and put what remai

    Understood. Though, Secession will destroy those departments, and put what remains in competition with the new government and their departments.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-28 14:40:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696171002055594393

    Reply addressees: @DwightExMachina @state_secession

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696101683233685862

  • “… truth-seekers basically have to end up far-right.”– Martin Stepan

    –“… truth-seekers basically have to end up far-right.”– Martin Stepan https://twitter.com/TheAutistocrat/status/1695756720172154912

  • “US HAS AN ECONOMIC INTEREST IN UKRAINE?” A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE: I had minor i

    “US HAS AN ECONOMIC INTEREST IN UKRAINE?”

    A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE: I had minor involvement in UA, pre and post-Maydan, and my understanding of the US and NATO’s interests was (and remains) rather obvious – and only indirectly in the USA’s self-interest. Everyone I worked with from State, Intel, DoD on both sides, the UA judiciary, the entrepreneurs, the people, every reporter, and every think tank, the main militias of Praavy Secktor and Azov, even the two “good” oligarchs I one person away from, was interested in improving the condition of the UA people and gradually preparing the ground for their participation in the EU so that they could follow their neighbors the Poles into prosperity – and hopefully, eventually, and deterministically encourage the integration of RU, so that the USA could exit the strategic burden and cost of Europe.

    Why? Ukraine lacked a Putin and his FSB to shut down the oligarchs and organized crime on one hand, and end the capture of the institutions by them. We even offered to pay for the entire judiciary just so we could produce rule of law – the UA constitution is fine. But every person in the government is underpaid, so must be corrupt even if it’s just doing favors, and without the independence of the courts, and rule of law, a civil society is impossible. I don’t know how many times I went on television there and said “You need the judiciary to convict, and the sheriffs who enforce their judgments, to end corruption – politicians are the wrong emphasis. You’re playing the wrong game.”

    In other words, economic interests are information that tell you whether what you’re doing makes sense. But that’s not the objective of the USA and certainly not the postwar order: end the empires to end world wars, by fostering free trade and nation-states: self-determination by self-determined means.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-25 22:59:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1695209261872058368