Theme: Governance

  • FOR THE AUDIENCE: THE LEFT’S ONLY STRATEGY The technique in law is called ‘Baiti

    FOR THE AUDIENCE: THE LEFT’S ONLY STRATEGY

    The technique in law is called ‘Baiting Into Hazard’. (Creating a trap)

    They are provoking your moral outrage, incentivizing your altruistic punishment, and then blaming your defense of right and wrong as aggression, by claiming plausible deniability, and victimhood.

    The state then can then ally with them, producing inequality under the law, and incrementally suppressing opposition under the color of law. So the state is complicity in a conspiracy of common interest against those of us who continue the tradition of maximizing individual responsibility, and prohibiting parasitism and dependency, which together incrementally undermine our sovereignty and the natural, common, concurrent law, which our ancestors birthed over miellnia, and is the only reason fo four outsized prosperity and their privilege of irresponsibility, parasitism, and dependency.

    This is the only technique they have. The only one. Baiting into hazard under cover of plausiable deniaibilty, to license the state in whose interest the increase in irresponsibility and dependency serves, creating a war of the top and bottom irresponsible parasites against the ever shrinking productive and responsible middle.

    It should be familiar to you as the means by which women undermine, project cut, and accuse. It is the strategy womens orgnanizations teach women to provoke husbands past their point of moral and personal tolerance, so

    In fact the entirety of the left’s strategy is undermining and the sewing of discontent by the use of the female method of seditious warfare against males who demand of them restraint of their hyperconsumption, hypergamy, irresponsibility for the capital of the commons, absence of loyalty, which the females then claim is oppression rather than defense of the commons.

    And for some strange reason we fall for it, and pander to both women and the left who are so obvious in this criminality that it’s almost unimaginable that our vulnerability isn’t genetic in origin. Though it’s rather obvious that Christian tolerance and forgiveness, and our tradition of individual sovereignty exacerbates our vulnerability to this criminality.

    Then answer of course is to equaly suppress the feminine means of antisocial, anti-economic, anti-political warfare as we have the male, by prohibition on baiting in tohazard, sedition and treason against the commons, despite thie wails of oppression – because no criminal gives up his or her crimes, without the force of the law to provide the incientive to find other means of reciprocal cooperation instead.

    We have – our organization has – done the work to produce these reforms and end the the warfare against our civilization and our culture and our people, and by extension mankind. Because they are a cancer that spreads with ease, and will produce yet an other dark age. Because it was these same techniques used by the the Marxist to Woke sequence used by the abrahamic sequenced of religions that recreated the last dark age we are still struggling to escape the remnants of.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle.

    Reply addressees: @BillboardChris @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-17 02:07:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703229266987462656

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703204476986032428

  • Because there are some of us who understand the geostrategic and geoeconomic wor

    Because there are some of us who understand the geostrategic and geoeconomic world we live in, and the demographic crisis that threatens us all. It’s very, very, very, difficult for those of us with knoweldge of these matters, and konwledge of history, to disagree with trump’s policies even if we find him a bit off in his management of public discourse -which in most terms is just using reflection of the left’s strategy of social construction of undermining of responsibility. Because that’s really the difference between the feminine and irresponsible and the masculine and responsible right.

    Reply addressees: @ChrisLoh @Auriandra @djrothkopf


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-16 17:00:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703091557224665088

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702795438980821086

  • Of course they are. They’ve been free riding on the american postwar geostrategi

    Of course they are. They’ve been free riding on the american postwar geostrategic burden and without american funding at the cost of our people, they’d have to defend themselves both from russian aggression, islamic and chinese predation.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-16 16:57:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703090744448225661

    Reply addressees: @EnnHanes @Auriandra @UROCKlive1 @djrothkopf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702778347854475535

  • European Confidence is a meaningless measure since all this means is that the Eu

    European Confidence is a meaningless measure since all this means is that the Europeans resisted Trump’s demand that europe carry it’s own geostrategic weight, instead of forcing the US to burn it’s middle class to pay for it – with the RU invasion demonstrating Trump was correct, just as he’d been correct about China and it’s affect on Americans. Just as he’d been correct about the attempt to domesticate the middle east, and the cost to our people.

    Reply addressees: @Auriandra @djrothkopf


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-16 16:54:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703090037661822976

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702731983850189277

  • RT @DegenRolf: “Conservatives have more favorable opinions of liberals than libe

    RT @DegenRolf: “Conservatives have more favorable opinions of liberals than liberals have of conservatives and thus conservatives extend mo…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-16 05:58:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702924823129624800

  • Are Tech Sanctions Against China Working? (yes, but…) The new Chinese chip is

    Are Tech Sanctions Against China Working? (yes, but…)
    The new Chinese chip is produced with older 2017 tech, and they are trying to copy the dutch tech necessary for the next generation we use today.

    I’m not confident we can maintain this much of a lead for another decade, but just as we outlasted the soviets, and we are outlasting the russians in ukraine, we are trying to outlast the chinese before the natural consequences of their government, policy, absurd geostrategy, and demographics force either exacerbation of their return to totalitarian isolation in an effort to prevent europeanization (regional states), or more civil inclusion in to the commercial world order by assisting rather than undermining it. The chinese aren’t known for being terribly bright in this matter over their long history for reasons I might explain elsewhere – though no one has quite determined the cultural vs genetic vs institutional distribution of that causality.

    The problem China faces is they’re poor country but they have a huge population, have relatively low wages, suffering the middle income trap, but centralization gives the government extraordinary access to capital, and that govt will subsidize any R&D that promises to catch up to fulfill the CCPs delusions of grandeur. And they can throw that capital, and three orders of magnitude the number of engineers, scientists, and technical laborers at a problem and we simply can’t. And leading capitalist democracies maximizing employent, consumer spending, and luxury benefits will allways be vulnerable to authoritarian capitalist regimes (Fascist) that produce adversarial competition against otusiders in favor of hyperconsumption and luxury of citizens.

    While the chinese population is apparently vastly overstated, and while it’s collapsing at an alarming rate, there are still only 750k ethnic europeans with an average of 100iq against at least 1.2 billion chinese with a 4-5 IQ population advantage, and more docile genetics, and more aggressive parents, and far more disciplined education, that despite rampant cheating and corruption, produces an advantage over europeans in tech even though on a smaller scale per capita than the ashkenazi do in verbal skills.

    Hope this helps.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @DragonGamerWiki @hsu_steve @PeterZeihan @whatifalthist @balajis @pmarca @psychosort @2020Blackstone @MatthewParrott @RichardBSpencer


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-15 16:10:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702716581812355072

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701972624220262864

  • (Similar thoughts. Tho I am not sure the reverse migration will happen without p

    (Similar thoughts. Tho I am not sure the reverse migration will happen without policy to advance it by the then-minority founder population.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-15 15:53:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702712327747907898

    Reply addressees: @MatthewParrott @Imperius__13 @DragonGamerWiki @hsu_steve @PeterZeihan @whatifalthist @balajis @pmarca @psychosort @2020Blackstone @RichardBSpencer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702707361297621049

  • WHAT ARE THE SIX (EIGHT) HOLES IN THE CONSTITUTION? Correcting The Failures of T

    WHAT ARE THE SIX (EIGHT) HOLES IN THE CONSTITUTION?
    Correcting The Failures of The American Constitution – Our Germanic Origins

    [A]s students of the empirical revolution, the agrarian revolution, the commercial revolution, and the enlightenment, our american civilization was…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-14 21:55:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702440841640325171

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702423177518068217


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    WHAT ARE THE REMAINING HOLES IN HUMAN THOUGHT?
    https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1638602036370456576

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1702423177518068217

  • WHAT ARE THE SIX (EIGHT) HOLES IN THE CONSTITUTION? Correcting The Failures of T

    WHAT ARE THE SIX (EIGHT) HOLES IN THE CONSTITUTION?
    Correcting The Failures of The American Constitution – Our Germanic Origins

    [A]s students of the empirical revolution, the agrarian revolution, the commercial revolution, and the enlightenment, our american civilization was architected by the founders and designed upon the ancient European tradition of rule of law by the common law under the natural law. It was an experiment in the third way: one without the parasitism and corruption of the aristocracy or the church, and burden of those of low character and ability.

    They saw the federation of states as a continuation of the European civilization and in particular the British Naval and Colonial version of the Continental Miltary and Holy Roman Empire of german people: an alliance of states under government, but this time a middle class -producer – government.

    Now, Natural Law means unlimited “Tort” or “Trespass”. Tort or Trespass requires individual sovereignty in his property whehter personal, physical, kin, or cultural informal and formal institutional commons. Sovereignty requires rule of law, adversarial competition before a jury of peers. And this leaves nothing possible but market competition for individual survival. And this market competition preserves natural selection. And the continuation of natural selection, is just as responsible for western exceptionalism as is our testimonial truth, evidentiary, adversarial law, sovereignty, markets, and perhaps even more importantly, our market for different elites: tri-functionalism (military, judicial, and faith).

    THE INITIAL PROBLEMS

    There were a set of six great errors in the constitution

    1 – The Natural Common Concurrent Law: Unfortunately the founders assumed those that followed would also have knowledge of natural law, and the common law, and didn’t include those specifications in the constitution. They only specified the organization of government, and as an afterthought, some basic rights that they thought needed defending. So the FOUNDATION of western civlization, of anglo civilization, and of the american civilization as the natural law evolved under the common law and those natural rights under that natural law were never stated. This is why it has been possible to undermine natural law (rule of law), and to gradually impose positive law (rule by man) -eroding our civilization from within.

    2 – Defamation and Conflict: The common law did evolved prior to the development of mass media, and while it contained libel and slander, and fraud, they had no concept of the use of social construction to us false promise of the impossible -freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – and therefore baiting people into hazard. They had no idea of the political scams that were possible, and despite Gibbon’s Rise and Fall being published, they could not envision that the christian destruction of the ancient world could be repeated in pseudoscientific terms in the modern world.

    3 – Truthful Speech: They also -although it was a subject of great debate – used free speech instead of free truthful speech because they didn’t know how to specific truthful speech as we do now. And they did not specifically prohibit seditious speech because they didn’t know how to write it into law as we do now. Though the harsh truth is, that any such demand for truth would have interfered with the christian religion even though the aristocracy had largely adopted Deism.

    4 – Religion is a political system: They also used freedom of religion rather than freedom of Christian religion, because they could not envision a world in which Darwin and the physical sciences had eviscerated the church’s ability to use false promise to bait people into the religion. And even if they did they had no conception of mindfulness and how to use stoicism in stead to replace it.

    5 – Closing The Legal Cycle: They also failed to require judicial review PRIOR to ascent of legislation, and failed to provide the return of legislative undecidability to the congress, thereby putting the court in the position of legislating from the bench – which is how the left undermined the constitution.

    6 – Monarchy as Necessary Judget of Last Resort Under Rule Of Law: They failed perhaps most subtly, by not ‘persuading’ (even blackmailing) Washington (or one of the others) into taking the role of monarch – who, like present Elizabeth – is a judge of last resort, and limits the fashions of the government the way the senate was designed to limit the fashions of the population. This is the hardest ‘pill’ of truth to swallow: that of prime ministers, presidents and monarchies, the optimum is monarchy, cabinet and parliament – and the presidency is the worst of all possible models. Whether Americans will tolerate a search for a weak monarch is an open question. The fact that the ant-monarchical propaganda is obviously false, and merely allows for alien people to conquer a nation and convert it to a corporation that can b exploited is not obvious through the fog of enlightenment deceits.

    THE SUBSEQUENT MISTAKES

    7 – Not Continuing the Houses of Government as Market for the Classes: The founders failed to explain the British, Germanic, and Early European systems, as corporations, under which the monarchy(executive) was required to gain approval from the shareholders (investors, jury). And that the purpose of multi-house government (multiple juries), was to require agreement between, and to create a market for trades between the classes, preventing any class from usurping the others, and thereby preserving markets in everything. So when Americans expanded the franchise to non-property owners and women, without creating additional houses, they indirectly destroyed the entire purpose of participatory government: the power to deny power that had forced a market between the classes.

    8 – Violating Triufnctionalism by Collapsing the Church and Education into the State: European civilization alone is trifunctional. When the Darwinian revolution undermined the church and her traditional role of insurer of last resort, and the false promise of marxism and socialism was spread, the state failed to maintain separation of powers and separation of revenues between the coercion of the state, and the care of the church, exacerbating class conflict and effectively denying both sides minimum power distance in pursuit of their interests, setting up a conflict that had to take place in propaganda and deceit, rather than in political markets specifically designed to provide those with dissimilar interests to cooperate.

    PREVIOUS CONSTITUTIONAL GENERATIONS
    Assuming we’ve functionally had five constitutions already:
    0-Magna Carta and English Common Law
    1- Articles of confederation,
    2- First constitution,
    3- Post civil war southern conquest,
    4- Depression experiment with socialism,
    5- 1960’s experimentation with cosmopolitanism.

    Then, we have, I have, in our Amendments, producing what is in effect the sixth constitution of the united states, which restores the original design as yet ANOTHER European continent of loosely federated states, under the natural law, unified only for the purposes of defense, debt capacity, dispute resolution, and trade. And in these, our amendments, we have repaired the six errors of the first constitution, as well as all those errors that have crept in since.

    And we have done so primarily because:

    1 – We struggled with the inclusion of the middle class and surplanting in many cases the aristocracy. Then we struggled with labor and the marxist movement. And we are now struggling with women with the neomarxist, postmodernist, anti-family feminist, pc-woke movement, and especially single women, who for the first time are at equal influence (more so) than men, but whose intuitions are the opposite of men and seek to reverse the western organization of civilization for the sole purpose of expanding individual responsibilty to the private and common to all that are even partially able. Meanwhile women work at cross purposes, repeating their undermining of rome via christianity.

    1 – the 20th century experiments in integrating non-European peoples, even non-protestant peoples, has been a failure. Just as the experiment in extending to the rest of the world, our rule of law, democracy, and markets in everything has been a failure. With the only exports being our administrative, technological and scientific innovations.

    2 – the European era of expansion, and our accumulated intellectual, institutional, and technological advantage, other than our genetic and cultural advantage, has been distributed to the world in order to drag them out of primitivism: superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, early death, endemic warfare, and frequent victimization by nature.

    3 – And so we can no longer afford to absorb the costs of not only policing the world patterns of finance and trade, but we cannot afford to absorb the unfit into our civilization without following the roman empire into collapse for the same reason. The only thing that distinguishes the invasions of Rome because of the great migrations Rome made possible, is that the barbarians among us fight with political weaponry of Democracy and the ideology of the left, rather than bronze and iron weaponry. Even though, like the barbarians, it is the benefits of the civilization they destroy that they seek.

    So, welcome to the next declaration, the next reconstruction, and the next restoration of western civilization. It will provide renaissance benefits to the middle, to our own bottom, and it will come at high cost to the elites and their mercenaries (immigrants), who war against us by demographic, ideological, political and financial means.

    Those all before us, and those all yet to be, beg us to defend them. And this time we shall not let Rome fall nor let the enemy, with it’s plan to undermine our people yet again, survive to commit yet another crime, another day.

    Welcome to the Revolution, Restoration, and Renaissance.

    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-14 21:55:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702440840818311168

  • Btw. It’s not clear how much of their remaining arsenal is even functional given

    Btw. It’s not clear how much of their remaining arsenal is even functional given the absurd maintenance costs. Likely subs. Question all else.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-14 07:27:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702222607855026606

    Reply addressees: @FakePearBear @EdKrassen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702222265180471718


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @FakePearBear @EdKrassen They can’t use them because we have told them what would happen if they do. Trump said it to Putin to his face, in private, as usual, not undermining Putin at home while clearly stating our intentions. We would kill him and level Moscow with conventional alone.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1702222265180471718