Theme: Governance

  • RT @Babygravy9: Next year is going to get really crazy. The “mostly peaceful” ri

    RT @Babygravy9: Next year is going to get really crazy. The “mostly peaceful” riots will, of course, be the template, but who knows what ki…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 08:21:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707309435226382670

  • RT @Indian_Bronson: Without the mass deportation of tens of millions, including

    RT @Indian_Bronson: Without the mass deportation of tens of millions, including their children, covering over a decade of illegal entry sin…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 04:16:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707247917445021884

  • There is a difference between the social media space and the people who are acti

    There is a difference between the social media space and the people who are activists and ignore it. Most of the people who are activists have moved out of social media.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 04:10:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707246435673006132

    Reply addressees: @sqpatrick77

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707234415242367115

  • Time to Separate? Or Time to Repatriate?

    Time to Separate? Or Time to Repatriate? https://twitter.com/Indian_Bronson/status/1707132341125099727

  • PREDICTIONS OF COLLAPSE IN 24 and 28 ARE MORE THAN POSSIBLE. (The Fix Is Easy If

    PREDICTIONS OF COLLAPSE IN 24 and 28 ARE MORE THAN POSSIBLE.
    (The Fix Is Easy If You Accept The Truth)

    RE: –“a big possibility of no election in ’24. Then an Authoritarian regime from ’28. A complete repudiation of democracies and republics by 2032”– Martin Armstrong’s Socrates Program

    Martin Armstrong (@strongeconomics) is a good systematizing thinker, a skeptic, perhaps a pessimist, and among those of us with a history of successful predictions, he is about as good as any.

    I am not sure that the outcome he predicts will be the complete repudiation of Western rule of law government, but that majority democracies are done, and representative republics are done, and it is possible many federal bureaucracies are done. And that without state competition between bureaucracies creating a market for competency, any central bureaucracy can survive other than perhaps military, intel, and state, and of course, treasury and court of dispute resolution between the states.

    The problem, which is relatively clear upon doing the work, is merely women’s entry into education, academy, workplace, and polity without demonstrating competency of truth before face regardless of cost, and the preservation of sovereignty and reciprocity at any cost most of all. The problem is women. So, is that a reason to throw out what we have learned from the Rule of Law?

    Any deciding body is a jury. The jury(thang, senate) must be large enough that it cannot be bribed, and unable itself to issue bribes. Both of these are solvable problems.

    Any members of the jury may differ in near-term means, but not on long-term ends, and not in the rules by which we agree on some set of terms to bring about those long-term ends. The problem is, as we have always know, the composition of the jury, must consist of those loyalty to the strategy of the polity – which is not the case. It matters by class, but it matters more so by sex, and it is disastrous between cultures and civilizations – (and demographics too different to come to consensus).

    If we are to say that natural law, common law, concurrent legislation, constitution, monarchy, cabinet, and direct or economic democracy (jury) that only assents or dissents, and of course, the court, then this is entirely possible to fix without catastrophic consequences.

    We can then prohibit women, or set criteria for women, or give women a house, and we can prohibit the female method of sedition and warfare against responsibility for self, truth before face(self), and duty before self, and prohibit any false religions like the Marxist sequence from being sold like any other fraud.

    But recognizing the problem is really just women, and as is now, was in Monarchies, was in Rome, and was in Sparta.

    That is the hurdle to overcome.
    The data says men act responsibly.
    At least Western men do.
    The data says non-western men, and Western women always and everywhere act irresponsibly, As such without demonstration of responsibility, duty, and loyalty, we cannot allow them in the academy, office, bureaucracy, or court. And likely the military, emergency services, and critical care.

    Don’t blame me for the truth. I just do the science. I don’t have to like the answers. But that’s the answer. And it’s really that simple. The belief that (most) women were instinctually unfit for the franchise was true. The surprise, at least to me, is that (most) women are unfit for education and academy, because they cannot bear the truth, and are causing disaster in our economy by their dumbing down of organizations and their competitiveness is something I would never have expected. Their destruction of dating, mating, marriage, and reproduction has been catastrophic. And their hyperconsumption of all civilizational accumulated capital is the worst humanity has seen.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @sqpatrick77


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 23:58:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707182947437101056

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707148952703742103

  • I haven’t had any interactions with Mike in years, and as far as I know he ignor

    I haven’t had any interactions with Mike in years, and as far as I know he ignores me. 😉

    That said yes. I think trump makes a great trigger event and I suspect that at this rate it’s the most likely trigger event.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 19:11:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707110671085674910

    Reply addressees: @AryanChadG @Cernovich

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707103661049131468

  • TOP TEN REASONS FOR THE PRESENT CONFLICT CAUSED BY THE UNTRAINED INSTINCTS OF WO

    TOP TEN REASONS FOR THE PRESENT CONFLICT CAUSED BY THE UNTRAINED INSTINCTS OF WOMEN IN A POLITY.

    Ok. You’re a good person.

    But let me help you understand the problem between the sexes manifesting in the breakdown of relationships family, reproduction, economic conditions, mental illness, suicide, loss of American competitiveness, decline in education, and the current escalation in the past sixty years of political conflict started by the postwar left – by the predictability of your response.

    1. All women think they are the exception
    2. All women practice the NAXALT/AXALT fallacy.
    3. All women reverse approval-disapproval with true-false because all women empathize first and then justify their feelings, while at least ten percent of men understand first and then falsify their understanding – with feelings rarely mattering. We think in facts.
    4. All women’s difference in cognition from men is reducible to the female evasion of responsibility for self regulation, other-regulation, and the commons, as that responsibility exposes them to risk of conflict, and that risk would require self regulation rather than continuously defaulting to emotion and experience and empathy.
    5. All women’s claims of oppression are demands from males that women bear responsibility for their display word and deeds at the expense of giving into their emotions – just like men must. So all female claims of oppression are evidence of immaturity (inner child) seeking to evade responsibility for impulse and action.
    6. All women defend against the effort of self regulation, truth before face, and responsibility for self and commons, by social construction of falsehoods and baiting into hazard by undermining, canceling and reputation destruction by the process we call gossiping, shaming, rallying, psychologizing, moralizing, undermining, sedition, and treason.
    7. All women are only devote in time but not loyal over time, so women cannot achieve the same successes in science, business, economics and politics as men – because loyalty is necessary to bear the cost and risks of competition together.
    8. All women are hyperconsumptive hypergamic selfish consumers who seek to access the capital produced by responsibility through men that they cannot access themselves, because their intolerance for conflict, risk, truth, and self regulation and accumulation of responsibility.
    9. We are in a period of time where women have had enough ability to express these antisocial, anti economic, and anti political, and frankly devolutionary and destructive instincts and especially seek to undermine all male history of capital accumulation in genetics, behavior, knowledge, institutions, and physical capital and territory, so that women can hyper consume all that accumulated inheritance for nothing more than self gratification by the elimination of their need to share responsibility because they are able to share political choice.
    10. There is a reason why no polities survive when run by women – because the purpose of a polity is to accumulate capital and responsibility for it. And the western group strategy has always been the maximization of individual responsibility in exchange for climbing the ladder of individual freedom liberty citizenship and sovereignty.

    And when a man says women or all women he’s thinking of a normal distribution, because that’s how men view the world, as unequal distributions around a general trend or tendency.

    Why would you even think that a man would presume it was necessary to respond with ‘not all X are like that’? Because it would never occur to men to think that we were the exception while at the same time anyone would conceive of a group of people as other than an unequal distribution around a general tendency or trend.

    I don’t make the laws of the universe.
    I just prevent people from lying about them and evading them at others’ expense – -which is what we call criminal unethical and immoral behavior.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Reply addressees: @lleahgold @schizarella


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 15:47:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707059516079030272

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707044437681954838

  • WHY DO WOMEN AND THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM PRESUME THE FALSE DEFAULT OPTION INSTEAD

    WHY DO WOMEN AND THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM PRESUME THE FALSE DEFAULT OPTION INSTEAD OF TEACHING THE CHALLENGE OF COOPERATION AT SCALE?
    —“Never understood why politics isn’t taught in the light of the vast challenges of getting large groups of people to work together. Same with economics.”—

    This statement is more insightful than obvious at first glance. The question is why, in an educational environment (an artificial monopoly in of an artificial equality), do students and teachers assume the default position that it’s in our interest to always cooperate, when in almost any other circumstance, cooperation is itself a scarcity that must be constructed via incentives to encourage people to pursue the same interests rather than their separate interests, given that their separate interests always and everywhere diverge in context, place, and time?

    Normalcy bias (we think we’re average) and we presume everyone else shares our goals,, values, and interests, when the entirety of the value of human variation especially between the sexes, classes and individual abilities, is that we divide the time space and resources of the universe into individual chunks and therefore together maximize human discovery, innovation, adaptation. Of course we are different. If we were’t we wouldn’t need to be sentient. We are MORE different than other animals. That’s why we specialize in innnovation and adaptation itself, by memor, mind, ,consciousness and frequent cooperation – so that we evolve by ideas fast, not evolve by genetics slowly.

    There is a good reason the administration does not teach manners, ethics, and morality, basic economics, basic law, and basic politics – all of which are market activities within the despotic monopoly that is the education system whose teachers are most often from the bottom 15% of their graduating classes. And where professors are almost always temps instead of employees, and are also from the bottom of their profession. So we pay for professors and we get temps. And we get dumbed down classes for great expense that enslave our people in debt for the privilege of getting access to the labor market – when an IQ test would be sufficient.

    That reason is that the truth is offensive. and by putting face before truth by teaching a presumed falsehood they create political discord in the society rather than fulfilling their duty of producing citizens competent and morally able to participate in our advanced economy, legal system, and politics. And so discord results because they are effectively lied to consistently for the seventeen or more years of educational indoctrination into a falsehood.

    Teachers are fearful of children who return home and question why their parents are losers – because they have the knowledge to understand their parents failings. But this is precisely what is necessary to raise the polity one generation at a time, and continue the development of our collective condition as individuals, families, the economy, and the polity.

    We need to clear the decks in education and rebuild it with very different people teaching very different things, and end the destruction caused by women and the education system that has brought about the present catastrophe – because we didn’t teach our people, ,but more importantly our women correctly before giving them access to teaching, and voting.

    Reply addressees: @Jake385719


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 15:15:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707051266424094720

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707032030985556330

  • RT @Jake385719: @curtdoolittle Never understood why politics isn’t taught in the

    RT @Jake385719: @curtdoolittle Never understood why politics isn’t taught in the light of the vast challenges of getting large groups of pe…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 14:56:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707046551846064374

  • RT @WerrellBradley: Thank you, Mr. Robert. In order to achieve a peaceful world

    RT @WerrellBradley: Thank you, Mr. Robert.

    In order to achieve a peaceful world order, it is necessary to have proper rule of law.

    The…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 14:04:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707033561574912400