http://www.kyivpost.com/opinion/op-ed/bernard-henri-levy-a-marshall-plan-for-ukraine-367900.htmlA MARSHALL PLAN FOR UKRAINE!!!
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-14 22:41:00 UTC
http://www.kyivpost.com/opinion/op-ed/bernard-henri-levy-a-marshall-plan-for-ukraine-367900.htmlA MARSHALL PLAN FOR UKRAINE!!!
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-14 22:41:00 UTC
HOPPE AS THE TURNING POINT FOR REACTIONARY THOUGHT – I DOUBT HE’D LIKE IT….
…But I am pretty sure that’s how it will turn out. He will be remembered as the bridge between the failed libertine (Rothbardian) program, and the reactionary program. And If I am lucky (luck being all I can count on) then my work in Propertarianism, Aristocratic Egalitarianism, and Operationalism/Testimonial Truth, will be the transition from Reactionary rationalism to a fully ratio-scientific argument for liberty.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-14 03:38:00 UTC
General Wesley Clark: America’s Global Strategy Begins With Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-11 01:31:00 UTC
http://feedly.com/e/d_SCnbxVThe numbers: republicans are the party of whites and democrats the party on non. Just how it is and the trend will continue.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-08 21:34:00 UTC
WHY ARE CLASSICAL LIBERALS (LIBERTARIANS) CONCERNED WITH “RIGHTS”? ANSWER: RULE OF LAW.
Our only known method of eliminating authority, is to create rules of behavior under rule of law, where (a) all rights are expressed as property rights, (b) all obligations and prohibitions apply to all, without exception, (c) all rights evolve from property rights by judicial application of the principles of property rights: (i)requirement for production/ prohibition on parasitism / non-conflict, via (ii) homesteading/first-use/abandonment and voluntary-exchange/construction, under (iii) the presumption of reasonable knowledge, and reasonable actor (Propertarianism:sympathetic testing), (iv) truthful testimony, (v) judged by peers – to new circumstances. Propertarianism requires also, (vi) such judgements be expressed as (vi.i) original intentions and (vi.ii) strict construction, and (vi.iii) in operational language.
NOTES
1) Progressives: Moral intuitions are insufficient for judgement in these matters, regressive, and dysgenic for these matters. Reason is insufficient for these matters. Our reason has ALWAYS failed us, in no small part because we are victims of cognitive bias that only disciplined application of science can moderately mitigate.
2) Conservatives: Moral traditions are insufficiently adaptive in real time for these matters. Our traditions evolved when technology was relatively static. and our traditions failed us when technology changed faster than our traditions could adapt.
3) Libertines: amorality is insufficient for the formation of a polity that does not resort to either retaliation or authority to prevent retaliation.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-08 11:18:00 UTC
http://online.wsj.com/articles/the-new-bureaucratic-brazenness-1412288561DOES ANYONE IN GOVERNMENT FEEL COMPELLED TO SPEAK TRUTHFULLY ANY LONGER? (No)
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 15:21:00 UTC
http://freebeacon.com/columns/the-case-for-panic/INCOMPETENT GOVERNMENT: the case for panic
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 15:20:00 UTC
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2014/10/03/why_nobody_in_washington_ever_gets_fired_julia_piersonTHE EXCEPTION THAT PROVES THE RULE: WASHINGTON’S REVOLVING DOOR OF INCOMPETENCE
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-05 11:43:00 UTC
http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/ron-paul-thinks-there-should-be-more-secessionist-movements-in-the-u-s-20140930ON MESSAGE: AND THE RIGHT MESSAGE: RON PAUL SHOULD STICK WITH DOMESTIC POLICY
Source date (UTC): 2014-09-30 13:51:00 UTC
THE “PASS THE BUCK PRESIDENT”
“Obama Strategy: Claim ignorance, blame subordinates, hope people forget…”
For the Austrians isn’t this the ultimate example of high time preference? We know progressives are the least rational group. So why do we let them participate in politics? Where politics is merely a proxy for violence.
Source date (UTC): 2014-09-30 11:49:00 UTC